@Imperious:
Your idea of a “dead man walking” on the beach makes it seem like their is not way to repulse an invasion on round one.
Well the battleships and coastal batteries do fire first with their huge range.
Defending infantry on the beach need to survive battleship bombardment before they can do anything.
Similarly the attacking infantry in landing crafts need to survive coastal batteries (ID represented by the AA piece) before they can do anything.
The attacking land force can still be destroyed in round one.
But here nothing besides coastal batteries stopping land crafts from landing. So I am saying you can’t repulse the landing. I know planes and artillery should get to intercept land crafts but thats not something we can model right now.
Interesting idea about machine after infantry secured the beach.
Maybe attacking tanks only land if attacker survives first round.
another idea is to allow defending artillery to fire AFTER BB shor shots and are considered preemtive… that way defender gets something as well.
round two:
Maybe the IA representing coastal batteries should do the defender’s opening fire. I think artillery shouldn’t automatically get additional opening fire.
ok so this:?
round two:
Then aagain is there anything technical difficulties assosicated with a forced landing by tanks instead of infantry?
If not then is it a matter of military strategy because tanks on their own are sitting ducks?
Oh I just thought of something.
We already fixed “one lone defending FTR killing 10 attacking ARM” in our new system….by making them lone defending air units retreat or die.
What about “one lone attacking INF killing 10 defending FTR”?
I think we just might just have to use my system :-D …of letting defending FTR fight for X rounds before retreating or die.
Then aagain is there anything technical difficulties assosicated with a forced landing by tanks instead of infantry?
Yes their is… tanks take much longer to deploy and would be destroyed by artillery before they fired a shot. Infantry is able like water to work its way in the cracks of the enemy line. In open country the opposite is true. A beach landing is allways done by Infantry… the assault landing is typically what Paratroopers are faced with. I forgot to mention that heavy tanks don’t perform too well in soft wet sand.
Thats fine then.
Current Index
Sequence:
Defender retreat
Aircraft:
Separate dogfighting and land portion
Bombers - fire in opening-fire instead when not dogfighting
Fighters - fire in opening-fire instead, selective fire, when not dogfighting
Dogfighting combat values
Defending aircraft must retreat after defending land units are destroyed
Amphibous assault:
Coastal bombardment - all bombarding ships fire but number of hits limited to number of attacking infantry
Defending artillery - fire in opening-fire instead in first cycle
Attacking tank and artillery - enter combat at beginning of second cycle, if attacker defeated in first cycle they do not enter combat
And the old argument on aircrafts…
The four boundary cases.
1 FTR attack 10 ARM - currently the 10 ARM would to retreat or be destroyed…maybe there should be a limit on combat cycles…say 6 cycles…after that attacking planes retreat, attacking land and sea units may choose to remain and the territory or sea zone is “contested” with no one controlling it
10 ARM attack 1 FTR - currently the FTR must retreat, realistic
1 INF attack 10 FTR - currently the 10 FTR must retreat, but not realistic, maybe defending aircrafts should be able to fight for say 2 rounds after land control is lost
10 FTR attack 1 INF - currently the INF is dead, realistic
Just checking…nothing in here for phase 1?
NO… this is prob phase 3
I have an idea.
Let anti-aircraft shoot every cycle of combat?
I mean the reason why it fires only for one round in OOB is because of the unrealistic model of shooting at every enemy planes. Now that thats gone this can be removed too.
If your talking about AA guns as built in ID of a factory or VC over land then allowing them to shoot more than once violates the 10% rule.
There must be more then that to the 10% rule?
I think enemy avoiding heavy AA areas make a part in the 90% fighter losts due to dogfighting.
Maybe the rate is to be further tuned.
only 10% of planes on average were shot down by AA during the war. Their is nothing more than that. It wasnt 11% or 15% it was 10% causaulties out of all sorties by land based weapons. WE need to end reinventing the wheel and move forward with phase two and three. The AA gun thing was allready decided at this time. WE will return to “fine tune” things after we get a clearer picture of the “big” picture. The other rules we introduce have a direct result on how much we intent to ADD to revised. If we add too many spices the soup will taste bad and nobody will play it because its gone too far in the other direction and we lost something in the translation of this varient. Once we all see what is done in the other 2 phases we can make things more accurate and complex. Right now lets just fix all the big problems with the game as we see it.
I like the idea of the infantry and tanks not being able to attack fighters. Thats maybe even better then defending and attacking on a 1. I agree if land control is lost and you only have planes they could defend for 2 rounds.
Oh ok we’ll leave the AA and sort out things by other means.
So lets look into the four boundary cases. Its a tough problem to model.
1 FTR attack 10 ARM
10 ARM attack 1 FTR
1 INF attack 10 FTR
10 FTR attack 1 INF
1 FTR attack 10 ARM
+++ they most likely fight one round and the tanks move off the next round. They are committed for at least one round of death.
10 ARM attack 1 FTR
+++Nothing happens except the fighter is dislodged to another friendly territory in flight range.
1 INF attack 10 FTR
+++Nothing happens except the fighter is dislodged to another friendly territory in flight range.
10 FTR attack 1 INF
+++ fighters kill infantry but dont occupy territory
I don’t know about 10 FTRS Having to leave if 1 inf attacks. Shouldn’t the FTRS have a least one round of combat before retreat?
P.S. I just got a copy of the original A&A! Ya!
