Conflicts of Nations, World War 3.

@ryandascienti Looks cool, but I think Europe is both too crowded on absolute terms and having too small territories with respect to what most of the rest of the world has.

I think you would be better either further increasing the area Europe occupies on the map or decreasing the number of zones into which you have split this area. For example, you could represent England (comprising Wales) as a single territory (instead of the current two), have a single territory (instead of the current two) for northern Italy and have two territories (instead of the current three) for the Italian Peninsula, and so on.

The Urals are rather small mountains and are economically important as a source of minerals: I’m alway perplexed when I see anyone having them impassable.

I was refering to regular ol’ Victory.  I have Pacific Victory but I haven’t played it.  It’s combat system is based on regular Victory.  It does look like an interesting game.

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/25245/wwii-the-struggle-for-europe-and-asia

Here is the BGG link. Some action shots

sorry, content was deleted

I played through the first couple of levels for the Xbox 360. It’s not a bad FPS and the story line for the game is pretty good. However, it plays just like the Ghost Recon series on 360 and it really has not outstanding qualities that I saw. I personally would go with Rainbos Six Vegas 2, so far it’s much better.

@Jermofoot:

@cyan:

arMY Jor: I just had the worst patrol ever. we got ambushed and we were shoootin at those damn towel heads for hours. i got shot 13 times. run out ammo at had to knife 5 guys. made a trip wire out of their entrials. the damn blood every were. glad thats over and were at base. so i can play some DDR. OMG. this is so totalyyyyyy cool. don’t you just love the colors. OMG!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol:  i don’t think army plays ddr.  :lol:

That was funny, but I thought you were going to take it in a different direction.

Something about a dance off with Charlie, or how his dance moves made him able to dodge bullets.

that would of been funny. matrix style.

If I do it, it must be dirty. :evil:

I’ve always found the history of the War card game quite interesting, especially when you compare it to Solitaire. War is one of those classic card games that is so simple yet engaging, much like Solitaire. Both games have been around for ages and have a sort of timeless appeal. War is thought to date back to at least the 19th century, and it is often one of the first card games kids learn because of its simplicity. Solitaire, on the other hand, has a rich history that goes back even further, with origins in Europe in the late 18th century. What I find fascinating about War is that it relies heavily on luck, while solitaire requires a bit more strategy and patience. This makes each game unique in its way. War is straightforward and fast-paced, which is great for quick, casual play. Solitaire can be more relaxing and requires a bit more thought, which can be very satisfying when you finally win. Both games have their charm and offer different kinds of enjoyment. War might not have the depth of solitaire, but it has its own appeal in its simplicity and the way it can quickly decide a winner. I think both games have survived for so long because they are easy to learn and play, making them accessible to everyone, regardless of age or skill level.