@Elrood said in World at War game 23:
@Karl7 Thai
eh no… Steve is up with Finns and Romanians… my bad
Rolling 1d100:
(30)
Capt Walker 3.
Colt 3.5.
Degrasse 7.
Dawg 39.
Entek 41.
Witt 50.
Sorry, life has been kind of hectic here lately. I’ve had fun, but I think I’m going to have to bow out for now. Thank you for letting me join.
Was good playing and getting to know you. Hope things work out.
Does Wheat still want to play?
Rolling 1d100:
(43)
Sure I’ll play.
Rolling 1d100:
(54)
Capt Walker 3.
Colt 3.5.
Degrasse 7.
Dawg 39.
Entek 41.
Whackamatt 46.
Witt 50.
Wheat 56.
Is that everyone, then, or are we finding some replacements for lost players?
I am happy with this number of players.
Will someone suggest the Nation combinations?
We should really have another player…
The axis minors can be played by the other axis players but the allies should have one more on their side.
Can’t it be 4 vs 4?
France could play Anzac/ Dutch amd China could go to Britain or America .
I agree that it is fine how it is but also that another would be good too.
We can take witt’s suggestion and pair China to US or even Russia.
China going to Russia would be good. We need to decide on a list to choose from.
I am happy with any configuration.
4 v 4 seems fine though
Germany, Italy/Finland/Romania, Yamamoto, Hisaichi/Thai
vs
Soviets, China/UK, France/ANZAC/Dutch, US
or Soviets/China
or China/France/ANZAC/Dutch all lumped together
I think Germany should get Finland but I do like Italy getting Romania. Minor issue anyway and can be settled by Euro-Axis.
Because youre first, just make the list Cpt and decide who gets china. Let’s get the ball rolling :mrgreen: !
US
Germany
Hisaichi/Thai
UK