Good news for some, and maybe others . . . .

My buddy and I whom I play tons of A&A with are both huge Matthew Good fans, we went to see a great show by him last night at the Danforth Music Hall in Toronto and I put some footage up on YouTube… Check it out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR9WZJShwvk

Try these Matthew Good titles….

Early Altenative, Matthew Good Band

Everything is Automatic Alabama Motel Room Indistructable Change of Seasons Lets Get it On Load Me Up The Future is X-Rated Hello Time Bomb Strange Days Carmalina Anti-Pop The Fall of Man Sort of a Protest Song Advertising on Police Cars

Later Fock Rock, Matthew Good Solo

Avalanche Near Fantastica Weapon Born Losers Champions of Nothing Sillent Army in the Trees Last Parade The boy who would explode On Nights Like Tonight What if I Can’t see the Stars Mildred Metal Airoplanes How it Goes

His influences are heavy on pink Floyd, the Who, and the Pixes

The Spongebob Squarepants Movie  :-D

Cops is also hilarious, my uncle, brother and I all love it. So is Southern Fried Stings but it is obviously fake.

http://www.blackamericaweb.com/site.aspx/sayitloud/kane223

Granted BET ain’t ABC, cBS, or NBC, but they made a decision based on the bottom line…
or the viewership line.  Which due to advertising works out to about the same thing.

What? They don’t want to edgykate de bros about the evils of W, Republicans, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice and Clarence Thomas??

I seem to recall one or more of the major networks going through financial struggles and having to cut the budget so the news wasn’t such a drag on the bottom line$$$$.

And now we may soon have Perky Katie Kouric(sp?) taking the anchor news_reader_ chair @ one network and the Survivor Celebrity Newstarget(who was set up for an assassination attempt by his own network) taking another news_reader_ chair.

More big money to a losing cause.
Just like Leno($14M/year) and Letterman($17M/year.)

Hahaha… so true. :lol:

The results of the study seem to be a mixed bag. See the BJM editorial…

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7398/1048

The fact that the study was authorized and sponsored by proponents of California Proposition 99(Anti-Smoking group)and then dropped because of the apparent survey outcome seems to balance the equation for me.

That’s akin to a district attorney gathering evidence that contradicts the outcome s/he wishes in a case. Then not turning the results of the investigation over to the defense attorney. The facts are hiden from the jury…

For a BJM overview and acces to a BJM abridged version of the survey, see…

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/326/7398/1057?ijkey=b97477b07669c0f43c8888f729d87cbc49a54ab2&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha