Other option is get it printed on 3mm poly styrene with a laminated finish.
By me I can get a 32 in x 72 in map for $104.00. 4 f x 8 f $154.00
Thanks, good recommendations.
Hi guys,
After some time I am back on working on this map a bit for my personal print. As I don’t like the mobilization board on the map I’ve had it reclaimed by the sea:
And I did another attempt to give it some battleship artwork from one of the rulebooks to get it balanced with the US fighters on the bottom right corner:
Which version do you guys like best? You can click the above images for a larger version.
Personally I like a version without any extra artwork (removing the logo, the generals and the US fighters as well) best, but that might be a bit to much time consuming for the amount of play this game will see at our group.
I’m not a fan of art just being here and there with no purpose, nice and clean I prefer.
agreed, not a fan of ghost images on the board.
logo could go as well.
nice clean simple design for sea zones works best for me.
Thanks for your views sired and robert. I’m in the same camp. Maybe I just have to go for it and remove the other artwork as well… hmm… some more work to do :-D
I like the 2nd one better (with the ship). It gives a nice symmetry to the board. No art at all as suggested above ^ would be perfect as well
@Nowhere:
Very nice, but with a map that big, where the heck are you going to play it? More importantly, how are you going to reach across the map to shake the hand of your opponent… you can’t reach him! :-D
Once you go big you never go back. Keep up the good work Tjoek’s !
.png)
Map looks great! I’m a fan of NOT having the ghost images behind it.
With your comments I’ve made up my mind as I’m going for a clean map. Just like my Global 1940 map
After some hours of work over the weekend I’ve managed to get rid of the AA logo and artwork on the center board. And re centered the sea zone numbers fo 29, 31 and 32.
Now moving on to the US fighters on the right most board.
And if anyone is wondering why the colors of my last pictures are a bit dull: I’m fixing the artwork on the original scans before doing the color corrections. So the final map files will be as vibrant as the current one that’s up for download.
The last corner with the US fighters was a hell of a lot of work, but it’s done. See for yourself the before and after of the Anniversary board (click for larger images):
Before
After
Just some more minor cleanups to do before I will release this final file to the community, but it’s hard to find the time at the moment.
You put a ton of time into this! Thanks for your effort!
Can’t wait to play on this cleaned up version of the map! Keep up the good work!
Thanks guys! It has been busy lately, but I’ve managed to revisit nearly all sea zones to clean up some more smaller issues.
After that I will do all territories and finalize the map. Hopefully somewhere in November.
Thanks Tjoek! Keep up the awesome work!
Any update on the completed version? I’m waiting for the final version to print it out for play.
If you don’t have time to complete it, can you release any working files (.psd?) you have so I can complete it before I print?
Thanks, awesome work!
@P-Unit I have actually finalised the file today. Only thing left to do is to generate the different versions and upload them. So watch this space the coming days.
Updated! See first post for new map files!
Let me know if you miss anything.
I consider these finalised for now. If people want me to correct Iwo Jima or Honolulu send me a PM. I might consider doing it for a small fee.
Hello Everyone!
With my inability to edit the base image color for Russian territories in the IL maps, i’ve found Tjoek map more useful and coherent to the original version. I’ve chosen the OOB version, removed Mobilization Zone to left and added some of the IL beautiful images (planes and submarine)… order of play is indicated in the faction board, so it is not mandatory to have it on the board so i didn’t add it. I would like to reposition Honolulu… but i think i will send this file as is.
@Tjoek: really great job!
Luca
