Game History
Round: 8 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 2 artilleries, 1 destroyer, 1 fighter and 9 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese 1 transport moved from 21 Sea Zone to 20 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Shantung to 20 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Jehol to 20 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 20 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Java to 43 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 2 carriers, 2 destroyers, 2 fighters, 1 infantry, 1 submarine, 2 tactical_bombers and 1 transport moved from 43 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 2 fighters, 3 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 36 Sea Zone to Paulau 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 21 Sea Zone to 22 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 6 Sea Zone to 22 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Shantung to Kiangsi 1 artillery and 5 infantry moved from Anhwe to Kiangsi 3 artilleries, 1 fighter, 4 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kwangtung to Kiangsi 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 21 Sea Zone to Kiangsi 1 marine moved from Kwangtung to 21 Sea Zone 2 carriers, 1 cruiser, 1 destroyer, 1 marine and 5 transports moved from 21 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 8 infantry moved from Japan to 6 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 8 infantry and 1 marine moved from 6 Sea Zone to Korea 1 armour, 2 artilleries and 5 infantry moved from Southern Manchuria to Korea 1 fighter moved from Japan to 22 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Japan to 36 Sea Zone Combat - Japanese Battle in 22 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 2 fighters, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber Americans defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport Japanese win with 2 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for Japanese: 1 submarine Casualties for Americans: 1 destroyer and 1 transport Battle in Kiangsi Japanese attack with 1 armour, 4 artilleries, 2 fighters, 9 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers Chinese defend with 4 artilleries and 9 infantry Japanese win, taking Kiangsi from Chinese with 1 armour, 4 artilleries, 2 fighters, 3 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 25 Casualties for Japanese: 6 infantry Casualties for Chinese: 4 artilleries and 9 infantry Battle in 36 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 2 carriers, 2 destroyers, 1 submarine and 2 transports Americans defend with 1 destroyer Japanese win with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 2 carriers, 2 destroyers, 1 submarine and 2 transports remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for Americans: 1 destroyer Battle in Paulau Japanese attack with 2 fighters, 3 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers Americans defend with 1 artillery and 1 infantry Japanese win, taking Paulau from Americans with 2 fighters, 2 infantry and 2 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for Japanese: 1 infantry Casualties for Americans: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in Korea Japanese attack with 1 armour, 3 artilleries, 13 infantry and 1 marine Russians defend with 1 infantry Japanese win, taking Korea from Russians with 1 armour, 3 artilleries, 13 infantry and 1 marine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Russians: 1 infantry Non Combat Move - Japanese 1 aaGun moved from Southern Manchuria to Korea 1 aaGun moved from Anhwe to Shantung 1 infantry moved from Shantung to Anhwe 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 marine moved from Java to 43 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 cruiser, 1 infantry, 1 marine and 1 transport moved from 43 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 bomber, 1 infantry and 1 marine moved from 36 Sea Zone to Davao 2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from Paulau to 36 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kiangsi to 6 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kiangsi to Kwangtung 2 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 22 Sea Zone to Davao Place Units - Japanese 3 infantry placed in Shantung 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 6 infantry placed in Japan 1 destroyer placed in 6 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Japanese Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 1 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 42 Sea Zone. Rolls: 1 Japanese collect 44 PUs (1 lost to blockades); end with 44 PUs Objective Japanese 6 Home Islands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 47 PUs Objective Japanese 4 Control Dutch East Indies: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 52 PUsFind League Opponents Thread
-
@leemorrison @Jacob16 Typically, the guy who lost posts the results in Post Result here forum
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/30808/post-league-game-results-here/3798GG.
-
@AldoRaine we can also consider slowly resuming this game from two years ago :-) pacifiersboard (X) vs AldoRaine (L +16) BM
-
@pacifiersboard sure that sounds great. I feel really bad about falling off with the games. I will let you know when i feel i have enough time to pick it back up.
-
I’m fancying a game of PtV, preferably against someone against whom I have a slight chance of making it competative - so looking for an opponent with an ELO of 1500 or less. For reference my ELO is 1332.
-
@FlyingBadger I’ve got an ELO of 1522, but it’s based on games of Global I played 5 years ago – currently playing my first two human games of PtV now. As soon as one of them finishes, I’d be happy to play you next if you’re interested.
-
@FlyingBadger your current ELO is 1553! Mine is only slightly higher, and likely to come down after my current games are finished! My PTV skills are not great it seems…Happy to play you if you are interested
-
@FlyingBadger will probably tell you this, but he’s talking PtV ELO, not overall
As @Argothair is saying, he’s just now getting into PtV while @FlyingBadger has 21 games under his belt
@wizmark is 5-4 with a 1538 in PtV, so almost in badger’s desired range but not quite
Badger only has 3 PtV games completed since 1/1/23 so doesn’t have a ton of recent experience, most is years ago
Argothair hasn’t played in the league since 2019
I just used the results tab and the PtV ranking board,
I recommend you play Argothair and teach him some PtV the HARD way!!! lol
Or wait for someone else.Just trying to help.
-
Sorry, should have been clearer. My PtV ELO is 1332.
@Argothair Looks like you are doing quite well in both your current PtV games. Check back after one has finished and let’s see where we are both at.
@wizmark Your PtV ELO is 1538 and you have won 5 of 9 games. Seems like a decent record to me, but maybe we could play if you think it’s not too much of a mismatch?
-
Thanks @gamerman01. Didn’t see your post until after I submitted mine.
Yes, I am a relatively experienced PtV player, although that experience mostly consists of me getting my ass kicked. Has it really been over two years since I last played PtV, damn! Do the horses still move two up and one to the side, or is that the castles?..
This is why I’m trying to use ELO to find a game I can be competitive in, don’t mind being the underdog but there’s definitely some PtV who would easily beat me to death with a sock full of s**t.
-
@FlyingBadger said in Find League Opponents Thread:
Has it really been over two years since I last played PtV, damn!
Just realised I was playing a PtV game last month. I’d say I need to drink less, but I rarely drink - maybe that’s the problem.
That game got aborted early though, so it has been one and a half years since I last completed a PtV game, and in the last two and a half years I’ve only won one PtV game (other than claiming a game due to inactivity).
-
@FlyingBadger I’ll give you a game if you want. Hopefully my losing record will be enough to lure you in.
-
@FlyingBadger Mika is kicking my ass in 1 game and im probably going to lose against Max as well. So my main experience is losing! DM me a bid if you want to play :)
-
@gamerman01 said in Find League Opponents Thread:
Badger only has 3 PtV games completed since 1/1/23 so doesn’t have a ton of recent experience, most is years ago
@FlyingBadger you just read too fast
-
I find it funny y’all are trying to race to the bottom to con(vince) someone into giving you a game.
-

-
@mikawagunichi cooking with the spicy memes
@FlyingBadger is certainly a worthy opponent for any of you 🤓
-
@Stucifer I’m at the bottom if anyone wants to be embarrassed losing to me. Lol
-
You are at the bottom of the league tables, but you would easily beat 95+% of the occasional board game players!
-
Thanks everyone for the offers for a game. Just thought I would let you know I’ve started a PtV game with Zarhunter.
I might check back in with you in a few weeks if I feel like I’m after an additional PtV game. I don’t want to over commit as I’m still figuring out openings and strategies.
I thought I could use ELO to assess whether someone was an appropriate opponent, but it was a more comlicated than I thought.
-
One of your respondents who had no PtV games played, was looking at overall which was very misleading.
Just look at PtV ELO and how many games someone has played, and if you want to go further, look into the results tab to see their detailed history
We put a TON of hours into putting that data in!
USE IT!!!
😜





