e677cdd6-362e-446e-9f1d-496b9ff026ef-Germany - Round 1.tsvg Game History
Round: 1 Purchase Units - Germans Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Egypt: 1 mech_infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by British to 98 Sea Zone: 1 submarine EDIT: Adding units owned by British to 91 Sea Zone: 1 submarine EDIT: Adding units owned by British to 39 Sea Zone: 1 transport EDIT: Adding units owned by Chinese to Yunnan: 1 infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by Chinese to Kweichow: 1 infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by Russians to Sakha: 1 artillery EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Alexandria: 1 artillery EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Germans buy 1 armour and 6 artilleries; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Germans 1 submarine moved from 117 Sea Zone to 106 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 118 Sea Zone to 111 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 124 Sea Zone to 111 Sea Zone 1 battleship moved from 113 Sea Zone to 111 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Norway to 111 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to 111 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 111 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Holland Belgium to 110 Sea Zone 2 tactical_bombers moved from Western Germany to 110 Sea Zone 2 fighters moved from Western Germany to 110 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 110 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 103 Sea Zone to 110 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 108 Sea Zone to 110 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 3 armour, 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to France 1 artillery, 3 infantry and 4 mech_infantrys moved from Western Germany to France 3 armour moved from Greater Southern Germany to France 1 tactical_bomber moved from Poland to France 1 fighter moved from Slovakia Hungary to France 1 tactical_bomber moved from Germany to 110 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 6 infantry moved from Greater Southern Germany to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from Romania to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 2 infantry moved from Slovakia Hungary to Yugoslavia 1 armour moved from Poland to Yugoslavia Combat - Germans Battle in 106 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 submarine British defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport Germans win, taking 106 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 15 Casualties for British: 1 destroyer and 1 transport Battle in 110 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 bomber, 3 fighters, 2 submarines and 3 tactical_bombers British defend with 1 battleship and 1 cruiser; French defend with 1 cruiser Germans win with 1 bomber, 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 32 Casualties for Germans: 2 submarines Casualties for French: 1 cruiser Casualties for British: 1 battleship and 1 cruiser Battle in 111 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the Germans Germans win with 1 battleship and 1 bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for Germans: 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber Casualties for British: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in France Germans attack with 6 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter, 5 infantry, 4 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 armour and 1 artillery; French defend with 1 aaGun, 1 airfield, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 factory_major, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Germans captures 19PUs while taking French capital Germans converts factory_major into different units Germans win, taking France from French with 6 armour and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for Germans: 2 artilleries, 1 fighter, 5 infantry and 4 mech_infantrys Casualties for French: 1 aaGun, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Casualties for British: 1 armour and 1 artillery Battle in Normandy Bordeaux Germans attack with 1 artillery and 2 infantry French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Germans win, taking Normandy Bordeaux from French with 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Battle in Yugoslavia Germans attack with 3 armour, 2 artilleries and 9 infantry Neutral_Allies defend with 5 infantry Germans win, taking Yugoslavia from Neutral_Allies with 3 armour, 2 artilleries and 8 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 12 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for Neutral_Allies: 5 infantry Trigger Germans Conquer France: Setting switch to true for conditionAttachment_French_1_Liberation_Switch attached to French Non Combat Move - Germans 1 bomber, 2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 110 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to Holland Belgium 1 tactical_bomber moved from France to Western Germany 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 110 Sea Zone to Holland Belgium 1 bomber moved from 111 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Germany to Western Germany 1 infantry moved from Norway to Finland Germans take Finland from Neutral_Axis 1 artillery moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 cruiser, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 114 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 113 Sea Zone to Norway 2 infantry moved from Norway to Finland 1 aaGun moved from Germany to Slovakia Hungary 1 aaGun moved from Germany to Poland 1 aaGun moved from Germany to Poland 1 artillery and 7 infantry moved from Germany to Slovakia Hungary 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Germany to Poland 1 infantry moved from Romania to Bulgaria Germans take Bulgaria from Neutral_Axis Place Units - Germans 6 artilleries placed in Germany 1 armour placed in Western Germany Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 41 PUs; end with 60 PUs Trigger Germans 5 Swedish Iron Ore: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 65 PUs Objective Germans 1 Trade with Russia: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 70 PUsLeague General Discussion Thread
-
@Amon-Sul
Sorry bud, but in P2V bomber do NOT cost $14… they still cost $12 but they do attack at 3 instead of 4 making them very much less powerful! -
@Amon-Sul
That’s your opinion that P2V is too complex! I think not… I quite enjoy the game myself. -
@axis-dominion
Different game yet developed by the same people who developed BM3… in fact most of the changes are based on BM -
@bretters said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Amon-Sul
That’s your opinion that P2V is too complex! I think not… I quite enjoy the game myself.the game lasts too long, too many variables. I prefer BM. But it is a matter of taste.
-
@axis-dominion said in League General Discussion Thread:
like how you really have to watch out for japan (or America) taking a land and then having lots of air that could scramble from the carriers to defend
I agree with this as a bit of a limitation. It is bad enough in G40 that amphibious assaults are very overpowered compared to reality. Although if you had realistic amphibious assaults, it probably wouldn’t be any fun.
-
The P2V game looks like it would be a lot of fun. its just a matter of getting used to all the new rules. i would like to play a few before i get in to the league with it. i think i made a mistake agreeing to a game before i practiced it first. anyone interested in a game in the play boardgame forum?
-
@dawgoneit i’d be down to play, dawg.
-
We need more players if we’re going to create two or three different leagues. I believe that it is the proper solution to the issue, yet it wont be as fun if there are only 5 OOB players/10-15 P2V players. I suggest advertising the league/s in the Facebook groups
-
BOOOO!
Did I scare you?
I am at rock bottom. My gym is shuttered. I got no woman. I’ve put on ten pounds. It’s time to get back to basics.
WE NEED A LEAGUE IN A&A CLASSIC! NO FANCY BS BALANCED MOD NERD SH*T!
GOT TIME!
-
@WindowWasher said in League General Discussion Thread:
We need more players if we’re going to create two or three different leagues. I believe that it is the proper solution to the issue, yet it wont be as fun if there are only 5 OOB players/10-15 P2V players. I suggest advertising the league/s in the Facebook groups
Well,
Thats the problem of OOB.
As for PTV with time it will have more people playing it. I expect a lot of people participating in both BM and PTV leagues.
-
@WindowWasher said in League General Discussion Thread:
We need more players if we’re going to create two or three different leagues. I believe that it is the proper solution to the issue, yet it wont be as fun if there are only 5 OOB players/10-15 P2V players. I suggest advertising the league/s in the Facebook groups
i go back in my games to see who i havent seen in a while and message them. i get some takers. its worth a try. theres some upper level players i’ve never played if someone in an upper level wants to go back and message them.
-
My two cents, been doing this a LONG time here, seen a few playoff, year end, and league changes.
Any games played in the league thread count in the standings, BM, OOB, P2V. People who choose to play here agree to their opponent and which version is played. Simple.
For year end tourney or playoffs, players can agree to the version of the game played, and if they can’t decide a standard is selected at the beginning of the year, let’s say the most popular version played the previous season, as an example BM.
That’s it. One league thread, One league standings, let’s keep it simple.
Is @gamerman01 still around? is he still maintaining the league standings doc? If so has he chimed in?
-
@666 not yet but he will for sure.
-
@666 said in League General Discussion Thread:
My two cents, been doing this a LONG time here, seen a few playoff, year end, and league changes.
Any games played in the league thread count in the standings, BM, OOB, P2V. People who choose to play here agree to their opponent and which version is played. Simple.
For year end tourney or playoffs, players can agree to the version of the game played, and if they can’t decide a standard is selected at the beginning of the year, let’s say the most popular version played the previous season, as an example BM.
That’s it. One league thread, One league standings, let’s keep it simple.
Is @gamerman01 still around? is he still maintaining the league standings doc? If so has he chimed in?
I agree, under one notion.
As long as BM is the dominant version. (or in future PTV as dominant).
What shall we do if in a year or two we have BM and PTV equally popular?
Or there is one option.
We can give a rule that the higher ranked or lower ranked player chooses the game if there is no mutual agreement.
-
@Amon-Sul not a fan of.
Because this started the discussion in the beginning. -
@aequitas-et-veritas said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Amon-Sul not a fan of.
Because this started the discussion in the beginning.I am for 2 separate leagues, or 3.(if we count oob)
I am just exploring other options.
-
@Amon-Sul i meant your suggestion to let either the high or the low Tier decide.
-
what if two players have the same PPG , what will be the tie breaker?
-
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/28660/2020-league-rules
It’s rule 3c in the league rules
-
@666 said in League General Discussion Thread:
My two cents, been doing this a LONG time here, seen a few playoff, year end, and league changes.
Any games played in the league thread count in the standings, BM, OOB, P2V. People who choose to play here agree to their opponent and which version is played. Simple.
For year end tourney or playoffs, players can agree to the version of the game played, and if they can’t decide a standard is selected at the beginning of the year, let’s say the most popular version played the previous season, as an example BM.
That’s it. One league thread, One league standings, let’s keep it simple.
Is @gamerman01 still around? is he still maintaining the league standings doc? If so has he chimed in?
Yeah, I’m here, from time to time and I read some of what’s in this thread but not all. You made a good post here.
If @Curtmungus wants to play the 1980 version or whatever, in league play, you can totally do that if you get an opponent to agree. You just won’t probably be able to play it in the playoffs, but playoffs are optional.





