Game History
Round: 3 Purchase Units - Americans Americans buy 1 armour, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 3 transports; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Politics - Americans Trigger Americans War Production Eastern: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Eastern United States Trigger Americans War Production Central: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Central United States Trigger Americans War Production Western: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Western United States Trigger Americans War Production Eastern: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Eastern United States Trigger Americans War Production Central: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Central United States Trigger Americans War Production Western: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Western United States Combat Move - Americans Trigger Americans Unrestricted Movement: Setting movementRestrictionTerritories cleared for rulesAttachment attached to Americans 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 16 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 17 Sea Zone to Iwo Jima Combat - Americans Battle in Iwo Jima Non Combat Move - Americans 1 artillery, 1 battleship, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 3 destroyers, 1 fighter, 1 infantry, 2 submarines, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport moved from 16 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 17 Sea Zone to Iwo Jima 2 carriers and 4 fighters moved from 7 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Western United States to 10 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 10 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 26 Sea Zone to Hawaiian Islands 1 fighter moved from Aleutian Islands to Siberia 2 bombers moved from Alaska to Siberia 1 bomber moved from Western United States to Siberia 1 armour moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from 91 Sea Zone to Gibraltar 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 86 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 86 Sea Zone to Brazil Americans take Brazil from Neutral_Allies 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone Place Units - Americans 2 transports placed in 101 Sea Zone 1 transport placed in 10 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 infantry placed in Western United States Turn Complete - Americans Americans collect 53 PUs; end with 53 PUs Objective Americans 1 Homeland: Americans met a national objective for an additional 10 PUs; end with 63 PUs Objective Americans 3 Defense Obligations: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 68 PUs Objective Americans 2 Outer Territories: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 73 PUs Purchase Units - Chinese Trigger Chinese Loses Burma Road: Chinese has their production frontier changed to: productionChinese_Burma_Road_Closed Chinese buy 2 infantry; Remaining resources: 2 PUs; Combat Move - Chinese 1 fighter and 11 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Chahar Chinese take Chahar from Japanese 1 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Chahar 1 fighter moved from Chahar to Suiyuyan Combat - Chinese Non Combat Move - Chinese Place Units - Chinese 2 infantry placed in Suiyuyan Turn Complete - Chinese Chinese collect 8 PUs; end with 10 PUs Purchase Units - British British buy 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 3 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - British 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 3 destroyers and 2 fighters moved from 98 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Egypt to 97 Sea Zone 2 destroyers moved from 81 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Tobruk to Libya British take Libya from Italians 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Egypt to 98 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from Trans-Jordan to 98 Sea Zone 2 artilleries, 2 infantry and 2 transports moved from 98 Sea Zone to 76 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from 76 Sea Zone to Ethiopia 1 battleship moved from 76 Sea Zone to 80 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Egypt to Ethiopia Combat - British Battle in 97 Sea Zone British attack with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 5 destroyers, 3 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber Italians defend with 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 2 transports British win, taking 97 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 5 destroyers and 3 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 55 Casualties for British: 1 tactical_bomber Casualties for Italians: 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 2 transports Battle in Ethiopia British attack with 1 armour, 2 artilleries and 2 infantry Italians defend with 1 artillery and 3 infantry 1 armour owned by the British retreated to Anglo Egyptian Sudan Italians win with 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is -8 Casualties for British: 2 artilleries and 2 infantry Casualties for Italians: 2 infantry Non Combat Move - British 1 infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 1 infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 2 fighters moved from West India to 80 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 97 Sea Zone to Egypt 1 fighter moved from 97 Sea Zone to Malta 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to Egypt 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to United Kingdom 1 artillery and 4 infantry moved from Iraq to Persia 1 aaGun and 2 infantry moved from Trans-Jordan to Iraq 3 aaGuns, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 9 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber moved from West India to Eastern Persia Place Units - British 1 carrier and 1 destroyer placed in 80 Sea Zone 1 infantry placed in Persia 2 infantry placed in Egypt Turn Complete - British British collect 33 PUs; end with 33 PUs Turn Complete - UK_PacificLeague General Discussion Thread
-
Right now focusing on a single game sounds so good! Better get warmed up before I beat 4 at a time
-
@gamerman01 I’m appreciative of your effort to track and make the league work. My hats off to you, because yes at the end of the day (or year) everything does seem to work out. And even though I’m a relative newcomer, I’m happy you provided a reasoned, frank response to my post. Really, I’m not disgruntled by the ranking system, but when other systems were being thrown out there, I just thought I’d put my idea out there. That it got some attention was satisfying/entertaining.
In the meantime, I keep playing and maybe see you out there.
Cheers:tumbler_glass: -
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
-
@AndrewAAGamer said in League General Discussion Thread:
Not sure, but as I remember it was majikforce who discussed playing other players and how it hurt his record.
Not fully certain, but I believe that majikforce isn’t the one. He has previously explicitly stated that he doesn’t care about his rating and is happy to play newcomers to help them get aqcuainted with the league.
Maybe you are rather referring to me? :grin:
-
@oysteilo said in League General Discussion Thread:
It’s not that bad if you allowed one game pr top tier player against a low/unranked player. I think it can be a neet addition
Regarding the discussion about ranking systems. Occhams razor is always a good principle. Keep things as simple as possible.
-
Thanks surfer, thanks trulpen
Somebody needs to kill Karl -
-
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
-
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
-
@Karl7 Maybe by then one of my games will finish as well and I can see what a top tier game looks like first-hand :smirk:
-
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
Not the psychosomatic thrilla-killa then? 3 games sound a bit on the low, careful side. ;)
-
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
Not the psychosomatic thrilla-killa then? 3 games sound a bit on the low, careful side. ;)
I am famous for getting over committed to like 5+ games and then losing a bunch because I can’t keep track of what’s going on!
-
I just finished a few, but still have 13 simultaneous ones going. I agree. It’s not good.
-
You wanna play me? :grin:
-
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 Enough talk! KILL!
Lol. We could do a rematch.
Ha, got 2 games going and maybe a third coming online… so, I will circle back once the situation has stabilized.
Not the psychosomatic thrilla-killa then? 3 games sound a bit on the low, careful side. ;)
I am famous for getting over committed to like 5+ games and then losing a bunch because I can’t keep track of what’s going on!
I don’t want anymore than 3 either, and that is too much. I have alot of online work I have to do.
-
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
You wanna play me? :grin:
Once one of my games ends, I will hit you and Jim010 up. Prepare.
-
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@trulpen said in League General Discussion Thread:
You wanna play me? :grin:
Once one of my games ends, I will hit you and Jim010 up. Prepare.
I’m prepared.
-
This is going to be UGGGGGLYYY!!
Kill Kill!!
-
It’s going to be worse. It’s going to be a slaughtering humiliation. Not explicit who…
-
@AndrewAAGamer said in League General Discussion Thread:
Not sure, but as I remember it was majikforce who discussed playing other players and how it hurt his record.
For me now that I know there is a friendly area to play n to help players get better I am content with the League as is. trulpen and I are doing a Tutor game and I expect to do at least 2-3 of those a year for those interested. In fact our first one is just beginning! CHECK IT OUT!!!
Just for the record I don’t recall ever complaining about my rank. It really doesn’t matter to me. I know full well what my rank is and where I fit in this league. I waffle between tier 1 and E depending on my brain capacity that day:laughing: I know what players I can beat and what players I have can have a pretty even match with and what players kick my ass! (looking at you AD!) So my ranking is just a number. I enjoy playing new players to help them get up to speed and hopefully enrich the league play. Sometimes it burns me (ie trulpen and andrewgamer beating me as 3’s) but that’s okay. It just shows their skill level and my lack of skill in an area. All for the better. As for the ranking system I think it works great for this league and is a proven system (thanks for all you do gamerman, greatly appreciated) Some people will just always be a certain level player no matter who they play, some will grow to be better players, some will not. It takes a chunk of time and commitment to play this game and maybe the higher level players just don’t want to invest in that to beat up on some lower tier player. It may not even help that player to get stomped by an M. To have a balanced league the higher tiers should have somewhat of a responsibility to improve game play with their knowledge. But not at the cost of taking the fun out of the game. Just my thoughts. Great people, great league, great game! Bombs away.





