Game History
Round: 3 Purchase Units - Americans Americans buy 1 armour, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 3 transports; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Politics - Americans Trigger Americans War Production Eastern: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Eastern United States Trigger Americans War Production Central: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Central United States Trigger Americans War Production Western: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Western United States Trigger Americans War Production Eastern: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Eastern United States Trigger Americans War Production Central: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Central United States Trigger Americans War Production Western: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Western United States Combat Move - Americans Trigger Americans Unrestricted Movement: Setting movementRestrictionTerritories cleared for rulesAttachment attached to Americans 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 16 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 17 Sea Zone to Iwo Jima Combat - Americans Battle in Iwo Jima Non Combat Move - Americans 1 artillery, 1 battleship, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 3 destroyers, 1 fighter, 1 infantry, 2 submarines, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport moved from 16 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 17 Sea Zone to Iwo Jima 2 carriers and 4 fighters moved from 7 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Western United States to 10 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 10 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 26 Sea Zone to Hawaiian Islands 1 fighter moved from Aleutian Islands to Siberia 2 bombers moved from Alaska to Siberia 1 bomber moved from Western United States to Siberia 1 armour moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from 91 Sea Zone to Gibraltar 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 86 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 86 Sea Zone to Brazil Americans take Brazil from Neutral_Allies 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone Place Units - Americans 2 transports placed in 101 Sea Zone 1 transport placed in 10 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 infantry placed in Western United States Turn Complete - Americans Americans collect 53 PUs; end with 53 PUs Objective Americans 1 Homeland: Americans met a national objective for an additional 10 PUs; end with 63 PUs Objective Americans 3 Defense Obligations: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 68 PUs Objective Americans 2 Outer Territories: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 73 PUs Purchase Units - Chinese Trigger Chinese Loses Burma Road: Chinese has their production frontier changed to: productionChinese_Burma_Road_Closed Chinese buy 2 infantry; Remaining resources: 2 PUs; Combat Move - Chinese 1 fighter and 11 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Chahar Chinese take Chahar from Japanese 1 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Chahar 1 fighter moved from Chahar to Suiyuyan Combat - Chinese Non Combat Move - Chinese Place Units - Chinese 2 infantry placed in Suiyuyan Turn Complete - Chinese Chinese collect 8 PUs; end with 10 PUs Purchase Units - British British buy 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 3 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - British 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 3 destroyers and 2 fighters moved from 98 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Egypt to 97 Sea Zone 2 destroyers moved from 81 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Tobruk to Libya British take Libya from Italians 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Egypt to 98 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from Trans-Jordan to 98 Sea Zone 2 artilleries, 2 infantry and 2 transports moved from 98 Sea Zone to 76 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from 76 Sea Zone to Ethiopia 1 battleship moved from 76 Sea Zone to 80 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Egypt to Ethiopia Combat - British Battle in 97 Sea Zone British attack with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 5 destroyers, 3 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber Italians defend with 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 2 transports British win, taking 97 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 5 destroyers and 3 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 55 Casualties for British: 1 tactical_bomber Casualties for Italians: 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 2 transports Battle in Ethiopia British attack with 1 armour, 2 artilleries and 2 infantry Italians defend with 1 artillery and 3 infantry 1 armour owned by the British retreated to Anglo Egyptian Sudan Italians win with 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is -8 Casualties for British: 2 artilleries and 2 infantry Casualties for Italians: 2 infantry Non Combat Move - British 1 infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 1 infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 2 fighters moved from West India to 80 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 97 Sea Zone to Egypt 1 fighter moved from 97 Sea Zone to Malta 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to Egypt 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to United Kingdom 1 artillery and 4 infantry moved from Iraq to Persia 1 aaGun and 2 infantry moved from Trans-Jordan to Iraq 3 aaGuns, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 9 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber moved from West India to Eastern Persia Place Units - British 1 carrier and 1 destroyer placed in 80 Sea Zone 1 infantry placed in Persia 2 infantry placed in Egypt Turn Complete - British British collect 33 PUs; end with 33 PUs Turn Complete - UK_PacificLeague General Discussion Thread
-
Yes, thanks for posting that again, Andrew, that you discovered the non-league area, that’s good, glad to have you in the league and A&A.org in general
-
@gamerman01 lol! Haha! I did beat you back in the day, didn’t I?
-
If a newcomer wants to experience what a tier M can dish out, I don’t mind being a guinea pig. I also don’t mind if it counts for league or not since I’ll make the playoffs regardless, but it’s a bit unfair to other players perhaps if losing to a tier M gives as many points as a tier 3 win.
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
glad to have you in the league and A&A.org in general
Thanks! Glad to be here to play and have fun and give back to the AA Community too.
-
That many years ago, who can debate? Oh wait, we have records archived ;) I’ll go look in the dusty “basement”. You could always claim you beat me in a non-league game, though lol
-
@akreider2 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 You might want to study some games by the top players. Triple A is amazing that way as you can review an entire game move by move using the history function and the “next” button.
I know I could, but that takes away the discovery for me. I want to find the solutions on my own. Which is ironic considering the India Crush and Sealion threads when the first esition came out. But still.
-
Great point Adam, but don’t worry, after a few more games their average will be close enough to accurate unless they can get a couple other tier M’s to play them so they can maintain that lofty 4.00 average ;)
-
Jim! We played ONE league game in 2012 when 1940 was brand new, and… you lost.
You very well could have beat me in some other game though, let me look for my old off-the-grid spreadsheets… <scrape, scrape>
-
No don’t look it up, lol! In case i lost!
-
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
No don’t look it up, lol! In case i lost!
Too late!!! You made your bed, now lie in it!
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@jim010 said in League General Discussion Thread:
No don’t look it up, lol! In case i lost!
Too late!!! You made your bed, now lie in it!
😢😪😭
-
Let this be a learning experience for everyone. Always keep records of all A&A games ever played in case a Jim010 comes along and claims to have beaten you in a prior generation.
-
2012 1940 league play
Gamerman01 1 Jim 0
Multiplayer 1940 non-league 2012
SgtBlitz and Jim010 vs. BadSpeller (Russia) and Gamerman01 (other allies)
Jim010 vs. BadSpeller (USA) and Gamerman01(other allies), Alpha2 version
Jim010 vs. BadSpeller and Gamerman01(UK, Russia, ANZ/Fr), Alpha2
All losses for Jim010Well Jim, you’ve only lost 1 game against me 1v1, but we’ve only played 1 ;)
Did you want a rematch? ;) -
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
Let this be a learning experience for everyone. Always keep records of all A&A games ever played in case a Jim010 comes along and claims to have beaten you in a prior generation.
LOL - Funny. Well Jim and I have only played one game and he did lose so I guess I have to start keeping records. Oh Wait! gamerman01 does that for us!!
THANK YOU!!!
-
You are very welcome. If they’re in the league, they’re forever, but out in the jungle… you’re on your own, baby
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
2012 1940 league play
Gamerman01 1 Jim 0
Multiplayer 1940 non-league 2012
SgtBlitz and Jim010 vs. BadSpeller (Russia) and Gamerman01 (other allies)
Jim010 vs. BadSpeller (USA) and Gamerman01(other allies), Alpha2 version
Jim010 vs. BadSpeller and Gamerman01(UK, Russia, ANZ/Fr), Alpha2
All losses for Jim010Well Jim, you’ve only lost 1 game against me 1v1, but we’ve only played 1 ;)
Did you want a rematch? ;)I’m still stuck in the previous generation of tactics, but sure. Let me finish losing my current game first.
-
lol just had to prove I had the records - you’re a great person to play with is why we played several games.
I’m just here spending too much time in the discussion thread because it’s not my turn in any game! :) :) -
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
lol just had to prove I had the records - you’re a great person to play with is why we played several games.
I’m just here spending too much time in the discussion thread because it’s not my turn in any game! :)Well you should lay the smackdown on the up and comers
-
Right now focusing on a single game sounds so good! Better get warmed up before I beat 4 at a time
-
@gamerman01 I’m appreciative of your effort to track and make the league work. My hats off to you, because yes at the end of the day (or year) everything does seem to work out. And even though I’m a relative newcomer, I’m happy you provided a reasoned, frank response to my post. Really, I’m not disgruntled by the ranking system, but when other systems were being thrown out there, I just thought I’d put my idea out there. That it got some attention was satisfying/entertaining.
In the meantime, I keep playing and maybe see you out there.
Cheers:tumbler_glass:





