casualties in stalingrad?
2371b8aa-f072-411e-ac62-352d65bfb5bf-image.png
I’ll give the playoffs a try.
Merry Christmas from Germany.
I wish you all happy hollidays, peace and strength.
It was a great year of conquering and loosing.
Nevertheless I am happy to be here on this site and calling you my comrades, brothers in Arms and enemys 🤣😎.
May the dice be with you next season.
@gamerman01 Count me in the playoffs as well! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year all!
Bidding.
I am sure this has been discussed at some point.
Option 1: Today side A bids, then side B counters and side A goes again. Sometimes this goes on for many rounds
Option 2: How about side A bid X for allies. Then side B gets to choose side.
What is better, 1 or 2?
Sounds like it gives side B an advantage.
in option 2 I mean.
@simon33 said in League General Discussion Thread:
in option 2 I mean.
Okey, maybe. Side A is supposed to bid the minimum he would take allies for…
@oysteilo said in League General Discussion Thread:
Bidding.
I am sure this has been discussed at some point.
Option 1: Today side A bids, then side B counters and side A goes again. Sometimes this goes on for many rounds
Option 2: How about side A bid X for allies. Then side B gets to choose side.
What is better, 1 or 2?
Depends. Between equal players I’d say 1, while 2 for players of uneven strength. Or maybe rather 3, which would be more of a discussion/negotiation.
I think the better (on paper) player should be side A
Actually, 2 won’t really work when not more or less evenly matched players. I believe the bidding process is out of play then.
I am in
@gamerman01 I’m in!
I’m in…if that can be arranged!
You know, I’m going to play the playoffs this year. Had hoped to reach the finals, but not to be this time.