Game History
Round: 3 Purchase Units - Americans Americans buy 1 armour, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 1 infantry and 3 transports; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Politics - Americans Trigger Americans War Production Eastern: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Eastern United States Trigger Americans War Production Central: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Central United States Trigger Americans War Production Western: has removed 1 factory_minor owned by Americans in Western United States Trigger Americans War Production Eastern: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Eastern United States Trigger Americans War Production Central: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Central United States Trigger Americans War Production Western: Americans has 1 factory_major placed in Western United States Combat Move - Americans Trigger Americans Unrestricted Movement: Setting movementRestrictionTerritories cleared for rulesAttachment attached to Americans 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 16 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 17 Sea Zone to Iwo Jima Combat - Americans Battle in Iwo Jima Non Combat Move - Americans 1 artillery, 1 battleship, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 3 destroyers, 1 fighter, 1 infantry, 2 submarines, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport moved from 16 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 17 Sea Zone to Iwo Jima 2 carriers and 4 fighters moved from 7 Sea Zone to 17 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Western United States to 10 Sea Zone 1 battleship, 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 10 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 26 Sea Zone to Hawaiian Islands 1 fighter moved from Aleutian Islands to Siberia 2 bombers moved from Alaska to Siberia 1 bomber moved from Western United States to Siberia 1 armour moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from 91 Sea Zone to Gibraltar 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Eastern United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 86 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 86 Sea Zone to Brazil Americans take Brazil from Neutral_Allies 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone Place Units - Americans 2 transports placed in 101 Sea Zone 1 transport placed in 10 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 infantry placed in Western United States Turn Complete - Americans Americans collect 53 PUs; end with 53 PUs Objective Americans 1 Homeland: Americans met a national objective for an additional 10 PUs; end with 63 PUs Objective Americans 3 Defense Obligations: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 68 PUs Objective Americans 2 Outer Territories: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 73 PUs Purchase Units - Chinese Trigger Chinese Loses Burma Road: Chinese has their production frontier changed to: productionChinese_Burma_Road_Closed Chinese buy 2 infantry; Remaining resources: 2 PUs; Combat Move - Chinese 1 fighter and 11 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Chahar Chinese take Chahar from Japanese 1 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Chahar 1 fighter moved from Chahar to Suiyuyan Combat - Chinese Non Combat Move - Chinese Place Units - Chinese 2 infantry placed in Suiyuyan Turn Complete - Chinese Chinese collect 8 PUs; end with 10 PUs Purchase Units - British British buy 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 3 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - British 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 3 destroyers and 2 fighters moved from 98 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 bomber, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Egypt to 97 Sea Zone 2 destroyers moved from 81 Sea Zone to 97 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Tobruk to Libya British take Libya from Italians 1 artillery and 2 infantry moved from Egypt to 98 Sea Zone 1 artillery moved from Trans-Jordan to 98 Sea Zone 2 artilleries, 2 infantry and 2 transports moved from 98 Sea Zone to 76 Sea Zone 2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from 76 Sea Zone to Ethiopia 1 battleship moved from 76 Sea Zone to 80 Sea Zone 1 armour moved from Egypt to Ethiopia Combat - British Battle in 97 Sea Zone British attack with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 5 destroyers, 3 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber Italians defend with 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 2 transports British win, taking 97 Sea Zone from Neutral with 1 bomber, 1 carrier, 3 cruisers, 5 destroyers and 3 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 55 Casualties for British: 1 tactical_bomber Casualties for Italians: 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer and 2 transports Battle in Ethiopia British attack with 1 armour, 2 artilleries and 2 infantry Italians defend with 1 artillery and 3 infantry 1 armour owned by the British retreated to Anglo Egyptian Sudan Italians win with 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is -8 Casualties for British: 2 artilleries and 2 infantry Casualties for Italians: 2 infantry Non Combat Move - British 1 infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 1 infantry moved from Belgian Congo to Anglo Egyptian Sudan 2 fighters moved from West India to 80 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 97 Sea Zone to Egypt 1 fighter moved from 97 Sea Zone to Malta 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to Egypt 1 fighter moved from Gibraltar to United Kingdom 1 artillery and 4 infantry moved from Iraq to Persia 1 aaGun and 2 infantry moved from Trans-Jordan to Iraq 3 aaGuns, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 9 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber moved from West India to Eastern Persia Place Units - British 1 carrier and 1 destroyer placed in 80 Sea Zone 1 infantry placed in Persia 2 infantry placed in Egypt Turn Complete - British British collect 33 PUs; end with 33 PUs Turn Complete - UK_PacificLeague General Discussion Thread
-
I appreciate the thoughts and initiative,
It will take some pretty serious interest ala BM4 or PtV to get me to add another G40 map version -
@axis-dominion said in League General Discussion Thread:
@Stucifer said in League General Discussion Thread:
@axis-dominion
3rd edition Global with a little redesign to incorporate the split-sea zone island groups and a couple other balance adjustments from BM/PTV (Sea Zone 36, NOs) would be a pretty good Christmas present š šiām down!
It is a project Iāve been thinking about undertaking this winter and if I have willing test subjectsā¦ ššš
-
@Stucifer said in League General Discussion Thread:
I do think G42 which is unofficially Larry Harris 1940 Global 3rd edition is very interesting to play especially given the constraints of live tournament play.
As it changes the start date, it is actually a variant, not a separate edition.
-
@Booper Chinese bots have been hitting the site.
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
I gotta be honest, we just had by far the weakest month since G40 was in its first year. In November there were only 6 games finished across all versions, and only 1 in the first 6 days of December. Maybe everyoneās taking a break at the same time, and/or maybe the games are more competitive and longer.
But thereās still plenty of action, and the playoffs continue to have VERY strong players in all 3 versions.
Classic has been added as a tracked league version of the game, though it doesnāt seem to have really taken hold. Iām back into Classic some, and maybe when Iām finally done with a big double elimination tournament, Iāll continually have 1 going. Pretty fun to return to the roots after actually learning the correct rules, thanks to resident EXPERT @The_Good_CaptainIt seems to me that the games definitely last longer, and PTV just boosted that up (which is not bad per se).
As AD says
i ll rather play 3-4 high quality and competitive games, then 10 fast ones, one sided.
The high quality of the tournaments just proves that the interest in playing this game here over forum still exists :)
Tehnical part is also important, overall in this year the site worked fine , triple a is great, we have the community here that helps quickly about rules , some situations which players encounter and are not shure what can they do.
Respect for all of U that give their time for this great site and community
Amon
-
And it seems that Karl is absent for some time , so its logical that the number of games fell :D
-
Someone signed up for the 2025 playoffs today, which prompts me to announce that
Signup period for 2025 playoffs is open! Check minimum games played rules - if you have a āplayoff spotā ranking in the spreadsheet that means youāve qualified already. Qualifications must be met at the end of 12/31.
Signup must be in to me by 12/31, if Iām creating brackets 1/1 you generally wonāt be able to enter the fracas of
First round of playoffs all happening January 2026!
Best way to sign up is private message me because your post on the forum could be overlooked
-
i know iām not that good but i donāt see my name in the over all standings
-
@dawgoneit Thank you for saying something,
Players are able to change the views of the sheet.
The filter was on, so it wasnāt full.
Select āfilter viewsā up there at top right and select āall playersā or āonly active playersā and you should be there. -
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
Is the league still strong?
It is weaker without you. But I am having trouble getting wins.
-
After the holidays, I will see where I am at time-wise and perhaps jump back in.
The last couple years I have been doing BBR, which people play via YouTube (donāt get me started) and in person.
BBR is wild, more like poker than chess. But you all would be proud, me and Gargantua when to a bunch tourneys in Atlanta and St. Louis and stomped nerds into dust.
Anyway, thinking of getting back to something more cerebral/serious.
-
Sounds like the tractor beamās got you, I wonāt even try to persuade because youāve already decided
Who would have a chance against 2 A&A.org league veterans?
-
Once upon a time had a 1/4 victory ratio against AxisD. (That might be an exaggeration, LOL)
I joined the G40 league right when it started like in 2012? Back then it was all fast paced, ripping turns, cracking dice, completing like 30+ games a season. When the āgoodā players got in, the level of play shifted and you either slowed down and thought about your moves or you DIED.
I died a lot before I learned my lesson (sort of).
-
Back in 2012, we still used battlemap!!!
Oh manā¦ the memories of trying to move 40+ mega stack and having the program freeze!
Yikes!
-
@simon33 point of view of a weaker player: Four years or so ago, you posted like five defeats during one single day. I thought: well, thatās my victim. And then you just killed me š
-
I donāt think I did a single game of ABattlemap on G40ā¦ nor TripleA on Anniversary.
Now once in awhile I play the AI on TripleA AA50 - pretty fun now. The AI is pretty decent actually. Itās fun to just take Italy and tip the scales for the Axis -
@Karl7 said in League General Discussion Thread:
Back in 2012, we still used battlemap!!!
Oh manā¦ the memories of trying to move 40+ mega stack and having the program freeze!
Yikes!
I never understood People who played battle map
I played early versions od triple a, and no matter how imperfect it was, still much better then battle map IMHO
-
At least you could put your units where you wanted within the territories and zones!!
It was really cool, typing out your moves like you were playing chess from an 1800ās railroad telegraph office š
Also, rolling dice on forum was more like playing in person than Triple A instantly spitting out the results. :aaa dice 3@1 5@2 6@3" sighā¦ š¦š»
-
One of these years Iāll get someone here to play a game of AA50 with Abattlemap.
@Karl7 @Tyzoq @666 @Zhukov44 @boldfresh @souL @DarthMaximus @Cow @CdnRanger @Seador @Battlingmaxo @Funcioneta @Zhukov44 -
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
One of these years Iāll get someone here to play a game of AA50 with Abattlemap.
@Karl7 @Tyzoq @666 @Zhukov44 @boldfresh @souL @DarthMaximus @Cow @CdnRanger @Seador @Battlingmaxo @Funcioneta @Zhukov44Loved Battlemap! Was very sceptical of this tripleA thing at first.
Suggested Topics
