@zlefin lets leave it as is. Normally one doesn’t allow these kinds of changes after dice have been rolled, but it wouldn’t have impacted the battle (your subs got the hits) and I appreciate you are new to league play. And I wouldn’t have scrambled given that htere were 2 battleships to soak to the hits.
League General Discussion Thread
-
It’s a special relationship between UK/ANZAC and Dutch
USA can’t take control of Dutch
-
Page 38, 39 of Europe manual,
No such statement under USAPtV did not change this rule from OOB, that I know of @Adam514
-
Thank you for the quick reply.
-
According to p. 9 of the Pacific Rules: The US (or any power) can capture and control a Dutch territory after Japan has done so, but this implies via a CM.
-
Thank you - In this particular game Japan has not been bold enough to attack that far away from the mainland!, but thank you for the clarification - I might need it later in the game! :-)
-
To be sure,
USA can land on or occupy Dutch territory in noncombat movement, just can’t take control
-
Haven’t played OOB in years. Seeing bids +45 etc… seems crazy.
-
@666 AndrewAAgamer gets the credit for that! We at Allied HQ thank him for giving us a fighting chance. How it went on so long with those low bids is a testimony to how comfortable players here are with the Axis winning most of the time.
-
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
It’s a special relationship between UK/ANZAC and Dutch
USA can’t take control of Dutch
Can we ask the follow up question, does this make sense? We have bm and yg and bb. I can’t get the play tester hat off no matter how hard I try.
-
@crockett36 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
It’s a special relationship between UK/ANZAC and Dutch
USA can’t take control of Dutch
Can we ask the follow up question, does this make sense? We have bm and yg and bb. I can’t get the play tester hat off no matter how hard I try.
It does to some degree because it stops USA from coming in and claiming Dutch New Guinea in particular, then being able to put a naval base down there. I don’t mind the rule the way it is.
-
@simon33 And yet t.here’s a 45 to 60 ipc bid
-
@crockett36 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@simon33 And yet t.here’s a 45 to 60 ipc bid
That isn’t because of the custodianship rules though.
-
@simon33 But it’s an easy common-sense fix.
-
@crockett36 said in League General Discussion Thread:
@simon33 But it’s an easy common-sense fix.
What do you mean? USA should be able to take the money islands?
-
My understanding is that the US can take control of a Dutch territory after the Japanese seize control.
-
@ArtofWar1947 I would amend the rule to say the US take control after declaration of war or a state of war is declared between the western alliance and Japanese empire
-
There will be a third edition someday I believe so remember the rule you do not get what you do not ask for.
-
@crockett36 Inside info, or personal prediction?
-
@mikawagunichi personal prediction.
-
@crockett36 said in League General Discussion Thread:
There will be a third edition someday I believe so remember the rule you do not get what you do not ask for.
It is slower than the second coming. Looks like they have stopped work on it.





