Turn complete
League General Discussion Thread
-
@Arthur-Bomber-Harris said in League General Discussion Thread:
@simon33 Not as frustrating as getting diced on G1 and giving up since you failed a 99% roll on Paris!
Hopefully the unsolvable disagreement over NG is also a 1%-frequency event. I don’t see anyone in the League playoffs who did a NG bid, but haven’t searched through every single match.
I think most players could find an alternate placement for those 3 IPCs. Otherwise, you could rewind the bid 1 turn, and have the other player take Allies.
-
OK, this is actually going to be pretty great.
There is now a pinned thread for
PTV
BM4
OOBThreads devoted to those versions. Talk about characteristics of the version, strategies, your regular season games, and hopefully the PLAYOFFS!
I would think we will enjoy more discussion about each version separately, and also this general discussion thread can be much cleaner and everyone will just be so much happier
ENJOY!
-
@Stucifer I will plan on it. Although PTV has just that much more to react to with the additional scramble rules. There is definitely a learning curve. You might take me down the first several games.
-
2025 League rules have been updated from 2024.
There are only a couple sentence structure corrections, and proper links provided for the rankings, and that the BM and PTV rules are now located in their respective discussion threads and not on a dedicated pinned thread where it used to be.
Just remembered, the one change being made is @Arthur-Bomber-Harris proposal that the past year champion and runner up are automatic 1 and 2 seeds for the playoff, assuming of course they enter. After that, lifetime ELO score at 12/31.
Thanks, @Arthur-Bomber-Harris , that is a great idea.
-
@simon33 I would never allow for that bid and never have. It is like a bid-multiplier, and I wouldn’t accept that.
-
@simon33 said in League General Discussion Thread:
Since its the time in the year for reviewing rules, can I suggest we change this one to allow land units on empty territories, really only an issue for New Guinea.
- The nation placing a unit in a territory or sea zone must have started with a unit in said territory or sea zone prior to placing the bid.
Reason for change is that pretty much every player accepts the bid and so does Triple-A. So why not make the standard rules what is normally practiced?
Let me jump on this post. Thank you, Simon. Is there a reason we don’t take January to adjust the rules for OOB slightly? People say it’s stale or boring, so why not change it? I’ve said this before (International Federation of Axis & Allies Players) but since we are the aforementioned, may I suggest the rule of 3. Per year only one rulebook change, one adjustment to bid, one adjustment to a unit. You don’t have to make all three changes, but you can.
I would personally suggest the top 3-5 players in the OOB bracket make the adjustments. I would also ask that they come up with an option bid number and placement. That can serve as an optional guardrail or a base for other players. Lastly, I would suggest they have one of the tripleA guys in the discussion.
-
Might I also suggest an in-person Axis & Allies gathering to bring us all together? It could be exotic or in Dan’s Jensen’s hometown. Or perhaps mostly based around the person who can or is able to host it? Or just swarm onto a local, smaller con like Totalcon up here in New England? We can invite Larry and make it a thing.
-
To broaden the post, why not take January to adjust any of the various game?
-
@crockett36 Stucifer is actually coming to visit my brother and I in february and we are going to be rolling many many dice.
I would love an in person get together. The question is where?
-
@Daaras and again, I’m aiming for less tournaments more gathering so the games would be fun not necessarily Extremely competitive walk away with a trophy.
-
@crockett36 we could just do a Saturday that way you don’t have to take vacation fly in on a Friday night. Hang on Saturday. Make your way back home on Sunday. or make it a three day extravagant my church would fit the bell for a one day event. I think we’d have to rent a hall for three days.
-
@crockett36 I’m totally fine with no trophies. I do enjoy some casual play. It would be fun to actually put faces to all the forum names. I also just miss actually rolling dice. I rarely actually bust out my boards anymore. I can’t wait for the kids to be old enough to battle lol
-
@Daaras said in League General Discussion Thread:
@crockett36 It would be fun to actually put faces to all the forum names.
Easiest way is to watch @crockett36 youtube interviews. If the guys you play with in PTV haven’t done interviews, ask them or do one yourself, more is better
I also just miss actually rolling dice. I rarely actually bust out my boards anymore. I can’t wait for the kids to be old enough to battle lol
Ah, the swansong of the modern A&A player!
Good luck! My kids are grown now and are both capable. My son loves WWII so much he watches World at War documentaries with me (and is much, much wiser for it). Got him to play Zombies with me twice, even helped him win, and have Classic set up in the basement.He pondered R1, got stressed out, and quit. Yes I told him not to worry about winning, yes I told him I’d hold back.
You do want someone you see all the time, obviously. 🤜🤛
-
Thank you for the suggestions you put thought into. January is the time for league rule changes, yes.
It is intriguing to consider different “flavors of the year”, but“No” to standard bids set.
Individual player game by game bids are preferred because of individual and unique player strategies, it changes up the game, sometimes a LOT (you mentioned stale). It would actually be more stale if the starting set up was largely dictated to everyone for a year. Guard rail not needed, inexperienced player can just look at what the successful players bidPlayers can agree to almost any modification for their game, so all kinds of customization and fun is allowed, and this is true even in the playoffs. But this is game by game so that everyone can count on the standard, out of the box experience without having them altered uninvited by others
If you have some consensus with multiple other league members on a change, or depending on the nature of your change, it is certainly possible to effect a change in rules. I give the people what they want, and I don’t think your suggestions so far will be welcomed by the majority. I reconsider if some of you start to coagulate
-
where is the league standings topic, can’t find it anymore
-
@axis-dominion said in League General Discussion Thread:
where is the league standings topic, can’t find it anymore
New standings are the ELO ones: https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/40302/the-new-elo-based-ranking-system/223
I think the old standings has been unstickied. I had bookmarked it here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pYDcR_d27qG312v_rq2q35wYEEfO6mjrX-Co1nvKrlI/edit#gid=818885946
Maybe we should keep it stickied but just change the title.
-
yes plz keep it stickied
-
ok, i have officially seen it all…
-
That happened to me TODAY in a face to face game of D-Day. My opponent went 5 for 5 with 1’s (infantry) attacking 4 tanks and I went 1 for 4 at 3. Sheesh…
Still won…
-
@axis-dominion said in League General Discussion Thread:
yes plz keep it stickied
Just the ol’ switcheroo…
The link to the old rankings is in the League Rules, under #3 “Scoring/Playoffs”
As is the link to the current ELO
Suggested Topics
