Yeah, full scramble.
League General Discussion Thread
-
PS: I get this error message, when I go to Game History and click anywhere
-
@simon33 I love you.
Starter list:
-
An option for unitAttachments to have a max/min canProduceXUnits when canProduceXUnits = -1;
-
Some way for a triggerAttachment to make all units of a given player convert to those of other players’, by some rule. (See this rule).
3, Allow naval bombardments to be declared without an amphibious assault (I’ve tried to implement this using a dummy “bombard” unit that’s produced by naval vessels each turn in a step between combat movement & combat but I’ve never been able to get it to work the way I want, & it’s horribly inelegant)
- Ideally, a token victory system that keeps track of how many triggerAttachments have been fulfilled, where the player can control which ones are active at a given time using a new step delegate (tokenManage?)
There’s some more things for edge cases but the majority of the important changes I think I can already do in triple a. It’s a really robust program (even if sometimes it seems the best documentation for writing xmls is just the parser source) :)
-
-
Almost forgot the most important one. An option for unitAttachments to allow units of certain unitTypes to move from one unit to the other, in a given number, with given conditions.
Imagine a railroadStation unitType that lets railCar units move from one to the other, but only 2 per turn, provided no enemy sabetourInfantry units are adjacent to either railroadStation.
-
@hengst I don’t understand why you would want #3. Like going back to when you didn’t need as many offloading units as bombardment shots.
For #1 that means you can have a factory which is limited in how many units it can produce and is also limited by the territory value? If I am guessing right. Could be nice, but surely you can live without it.
#4, I think that can be tracked by the players.
#5. interesting idea, moves you way up the complexity chain.
-
@martin I am not aware of any solution. I believe it is to do with adding units via edit mode. Or at least that is my working theory. Maybe download intermediate save games to view them.
-
Illegal State Exception (attempting merging values British and British)Sounds like it is caused by Brexit, probably best to just blame Liz Truss.
Seriously though, I think I have had this when looking back at games which have had units added with the edit function, maybe maybe some unique value constraint is broken by the edit. I’m sure I recall that the edit function is still in beta but is included in the production release of TripleA due to it’s extreme usefulness (expecially by people like me who forget to make key moves :drooling_face:).
-
Yeah, I was sure it was due to Brexit!
-
Guys, I recommended our leagues in a larger Axis & Allies Facebook Group. The feedback I get is that people are annoyed by the fact that play by forum does not work, and they prefer using the Table Top Simulator on Steam instead of TripleA.
Maybe you also want to put some supportive comments, in case you are on Facebook:
-
Pausing league and Playoffs in order to do the real thing! :-)
Greetings from Martin and Harry (elche)
-
@martin Reminds me of the old days! Spending hours and hours away from the kids :upside_down_face:
-
-
Wow. Fun that you shared - fancy set up!
Question! Do you use calculators or do you go old school?? It’s hard to play on a board when you’re used to Triple A!
-
@gamerman01 thank you. We play old school without calculator, and that’s quite a challenge 😅 I did an educated guess of a 55% chance of taking Moscow and failed badly…
I am counting the number of units on each side and in parallel I sum up the “hit values” of the units like a 3 for an attacking fighter or a 4 for a defending one. But after too much beer it proved to be difficult, LOL
-
I just play the little A&A&Zombies game with my son and quickly realize that without the calculator I am quite vulnerable.
-
Then I give him so much advice that I lose, but I really just beat myself :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
-
Can you please advice if Venezuela is adjacent to the Central America in the BM4 map?
-
@me1945 gamerman can confirm, but I’m fairly sure they are not.
-
I assume the board mapping for BM is the same as it is in the G40 2nd edition map. Not having the board game handy, I googled the map and failed to see where the line goes between the countries.
-
@me1945 it should be the same. When I look at the map it looks a bit indeterminate but I’m fairly sure I tried this years ago and learned that they were not connected.
-
No change there with BM
Couldn’t remember from the last time geography has been clarified, so I got out my E40 board.
There is no shared border between Venezuela and Central America - they definitely are not adjacent for the game.
Suggested Topics
