VANN FORMULAS

@fasthard ok thanks for explaining! Have a good day!

Especially want one that can be used with just Pacific Edition 1940 2nd edition please:)

@Emanon

Right arm RightArm.png

You should check this out for easy on the eyes :)

Screenshot from 2025-02-25 14-57-09.png

@Black_Elk s Global map :)

Somewhere way down the road, perhaps that mobile Holographic version will be available. Perhaps for the 50th. Anniversary of the 1980s GameMaster Series, thanks, Pellulo

@fasthard Thank you.

Wait. Vann made a mistake? What?

OMG GUYZ

I’ve BEEN REVIEWING THE VANN FORMULA AND HAVE DISCOVERED A FATAL FLAW

LOOK AT THE RESULTS OF THE VANN FORMULA BELOW.

Attack/defense=A/D
INFANTRY        1.85/3.7
MECH              1.04/2.08
ARTILLERY      2.08/2.08
TANK              1.39/1.39
FIGHTER          .5/.667
TECHBOMB      (.413/.551)/.413
BOMBER          .463/.116
SUB                1.39/.463
DESTROYER      .521/.521
CRUISER          .347/347
CARRIER          0/.139
BATTLESHIP    .267/.267

THE GOAL OF THE VANN FORMULA AS STATED BY VANN ON MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS IS TO DETECT OBSOLETE AND USELESS AXIS AND ALLIES UNITS.

YOU WILL NOTE BY COMPARISON THAT THE VANN VALUE FOR TRANSPORTS MUST BE 0.

MEANING IT’S THE MOST USELESS AND OBSOLETE UNIT IN THE GAME, THAT SERVES NO PURPOSE, AND CLEARLY ANYONE WHO WOULD EVER BUY ONE WOULD CLEARLY BE A FOOL.

THIS IS A FATAL FLAW!  AS THE ALLIES and/OR JAPAN WOULD CERTAINLY LOSE IF THEY NEVER BOUGHT TRANSPORTS.

I DEMAND A FULL RESPONSE FROM VANN  HIS NEW GAME ALLIES AND AXIS IS DOOMED TO FAIL UNLESS HE UNDERSTANDS THIS CRITICAL FLAW!

And we haven’t even talked about Complexes and Air/Naval BASES yet.
OMG WHAT IS VANN GOING TO DO GUYZ?

@gamerman01 Thanks, I have 34 different variations/editions now :D