Strategic Bombing on Calcutta

@ShadowHAwk:

Nice this gives the UK the option to take JAVA and anzac the option to get 2 NO’s.

UK would take Sumatra UK1.  Java is an option of course, but even if ANZAC sends its ships there, the entire weight of Japan’s Navy falls on it.  Unless ANZAC moves to Java, Japan can take it with no resistance on J2 considering Japan goes before both nations

And you leave the UK BB alone, could be interesting fleet wise to group everything in queensland that can get there round 1 and dare japan to attack it.
2 BB 2 cruisers 2 destroyers and 3 fighters should be enough to either make it a mutual annihilation ( ill take that ) or an allied victory.

UK can run to ANZAC if it wants with its BB.  It’ll be isolated there and playing escort duty at best.

And move the US air from midway to Quensland so you wont be taking that 1 either, also gives a nice attack option near the money islands. This will force you to protect the transports and you cant protect them all unless you use blockers which ill gladly destroy.

As I said, I don’t want to take Queensland early.  I just want it to appear that I could attempt to.  US can easily fly itself down there - and typically would - along with its Navy.  The alternative would be to establish a convoy in SZ6 and/or take Korea.  Both I spoke about and attempt to delay it where possible.

The Allies can always stage off Queensland.  In fact, it is suggested to do so in order to contest Japan’s expansion in the South Pacific.

This is nothing new, but the goal is for Japan to always be a single turn ahead of a tri-headed navy with a logical confrontation off of Malaya or Java as the IJN turns back from it’s siege of Calcutta.

Even the loss of DEI early is mitigated with IC placement as DD/SS/SB being mobilized there really change what the Allies thought was a well crafted trap of the IJN.

@simon33:

I don’t really understand why the above is superior to YG’s approach for a J1 DOW. I only see 3 inf who can attack Yunnan J2 and maybe a Mec - is that all the ground that goes in there? Putting a max land based attack (4inf + 8ftr + 5tb + 2sb) vs max defence (13inf + 1mec + 2tb + 1ftr + 1tank - assuming all UK fighters are defending in India against strat bombing, one inf loss China1 and maximum USSR land help plus two planes) into the calculator I get the Japanese winning 92% but at the cost of 8 planes and that’s without insisting on taking the territory.

Nothing is ever fool proof - clearly a kitchen sink effort to secure Yunnan from J2 gives one pause to consider the trade off.  I think I actually alluded to it in my final talking points that there are times where it is not value-added to take Yunnan J2 because you’ll be much stronger on J3 and even more so on J4.

I have rarely seen (other than my own strategy) of moving the Russians into Yunnan early.  I know it can work but sometimes I question the trade off the Russians make if Japan actually does attack anyways.  Does that sink Moscow (it has for me)?  Are you already intending to replace those lost aircraft with Allied Aircraft from UK London or maybe Persia?

@simon33:

@Spendo02:

clearly a kitchen sink effort to secure Yunnan from J2 gives one pause to consider the trade off.

I think the major problem with the kitchen sink effort is that you expose Russian mobile units from Russia in Szechwan to air (only) attack. FIC really needs reinforcement from Japan J2 or massive aerial reinforcement to survive a USSR3 mobile + air attack. But presumably that will occur and will thin out Shan State if you throw the kitchen sink that for J3. Throwing the kitchen sink at Yunnan J2 also means you can’t reinforce Suiyan significantly. I’m reconsidering this idea now.

My typical J2 includes moving in 4 ground units via the J1 2 TT purchase into FIC.  All aircraft also land there.  FIC is a linchpin territory to hold due to the ability to continue a stream of 3 ground units / turn within great proximity of multiple territories.

I also want to clarify that rarely do I see Russia get involved in China outside of stepping into Manchuria and/or Korea.  Clearly a player who tends to use the Russians to cause interference with Japan may simply require a J1 DOW to clear out its units in Amur and start chewing up IPC and territories once broken.

It may take a few games for the player controlling the Russians to stop running so much interference because a Japan and Germany working to take Moscow could spell problems for the Allies.  Turns the game into a race to Egypt.  Its actually a pretty boring game that way - the US could simply go watch a baseball game and come back before it can DOW.

@simon33:

J1 DOW can’t clear out units in Amur unless USSR has passed on the opportunity to evacuate.

As for all air units into FIC, that does expose Kwangtung to a mobile assault. China can clear out a blocker. Obviously this means that the kitchen sink has been thrown at Yunnan. I guess you’d be inclined to change up in that event.

I’d suggest reconsidering your position on Amur.  It can surely be taken regardless if it was stacked upon, left alone or evacuated (last one’s easy).  The only question is, at what expense?

There are at least 16 ground units that can reach Amur on J1, all but 3 aircraft can reach it, and you can throw in a few bombards as well for good measure.

You give up a lot of positioning and posturing for doing this and you surely don’t need all of this to take Amur, but if Japan’s strategy is to clear out those units and start advancing on Russia, clearly Amur is the beginning of that strategy and Russia cannot do anything about it except evacuate and swing around with the Mongolians later or evacuate them as well.

I highly suggest you reconsider talking in authoritative certainties.  Just because it may not be a preferred move does not make it impossible to do.

@simon33:

You must have misread what I wrote - I’m expecting USSR to evacuate Amur R1. If they don’t, they can certainly be taken down. My point is that with the turn order, USSR moves first and can and should evacuate most of their units out, unless they’re intentionally inviting an attack.

I did.  Apologies!