sent a chat so we don’t clutter up this thread
1st Annual Cellar Gaming TripleA Octathalon – Brackets and Win Posts
-
ACGTO 270 BC redrum (Roman alliance) v Bacala (Anti-Roman alliance)
redrum wins from Bacala
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38523.msg1587358#new
-
LOTR redrum(Good) over DizzKneeLand33(Evil)
And our first real point is scored with a fourth place finish for Dizzkneeland33 in LOTR!
-
270BC:
Balladeer [Sides: even is Roman, odd is Anti-Roman] vs Entek
Rolling 1d20:
(14) -
TRS: Bacala (allies) over Balladeer (axis).
Well done, you got to me before I got to you :-)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38269.new#new
-
LOTR: Bacala over Balladeer
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38344.new#new
-
TAW: Bacala wins from Entek
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38697.msg1595263#new
-
Lord Of The Rings:
redrum [Sides: even is Good, odd is Evil] vs Balladeer
Rolling 1d20:
(8)Total Ancient War:
Bacala vs Balladeer, 2nd game: Bacala = Anti-Romans, Balladeer = Romans
-
Geesh, Balladeer – 5/5 now on your Evilness… :evil:
-
ACGTO NE redrum (coalition) vs Bacala (carolingians)
redrum wins
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38524.msg1596715#new
-
So it is the Final, at last. I have been waiting since March.
Can you roll for sides, please Dizz? -
@Wittmann - Technically its not the final yet as the winner of our game will then play the winner of the loser’s bracket for the true final. Either way best of luck :-)
-
Napoleonic Empires:
wittman [Sides: even is Coalition, odd is Carolingians] vs redrum
Rolling 1d20:
(16)captain walker [Sides: even is Coalition, odd is Carolingians] vs Bacala
Rolling 1d20:
(1) -
@Wittmann - Technically its not the final yet as the winner of our game will then play the winner of the loser’s bracket for the true final. Either way best of luck :-)
Thank you for explaining.
Good luck yourself.
My email: pontevecchio1@googlemail.com
Leo. -
Lord Of The Rings:
redrum [Sides: even is Good, odd is Evil] vs Balladeer
Rolling 1d20:
(8)Total Ancient War:
Bacala vs Balladeer, 2nd game: Bacala = Anti-Romans, Balladeer = Romans
Woops, missed this post, I’ll set em both up ASAP
-
anybody want to play a game of 1 on 1 TRS in the play board game forum?
-
Balladeer over Entek in 270BC
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38667.new#new
-
270 BC:
Balladeer vs Bacala, 2nd game: Bacala = Anti-Romans, Balladeer = Romans
–>Note to all: if your brackets do not update with the new information (using Chrome, for example) clearing the browsing data for pictures should do the trick. What a pain tho… love that the internet is less efficient that 20 years ago…
-
Hi All,
For the next tournament i would suggest changing the format. The double elemination is fun but has too many games on the loser side, it takes a very long time to finish a tournament. Maybe we could do a poule system(4 players), then all games in the first round can start at the same time. With the top two going to the konckout fase.
As for throwing a dice for the sides: i think bidding for which side to play would be fairer and more fun.
If we start a game every month or three weeks maybe we could start in january (at least 8 players in a tournament).
Let me know what you think.
Greetings, Bacala
-
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38896.new#new
Bacala (anti Roman) over Balladeer (Roman)
-
Hi All,
For the next tournament i would suggest changing the format. The double elemination is fun but has too many games on the loser side, it takes a very long time to finish a tournament. Maybe we could do a poule system(4 players), then all games in the first round can start at the same time. With the top two going to the konckout fase.
As for throwing a dice for the sides: i think bidding for which side to play would be fairer and more fun.
If we start a game every month or three weeks maybe we could start in january (at least 8 players in a tournament).
Let me know what you think.
Greetings, Bacala
I agree, double elimination makes the tournament last real long. Your proposal makes sense, but I’m not sure if everyone will get enough games. If you want you can also let the bottom half of the poule play a second KO-fase, getting 2 winners for each tournaments (one for the top half and one for the bottom half).
Bidding sounds good, but I’m not sure if it works, since the games are all so new to us, we might be doing ridiculous things and there are very few games to learn from what a reasonable bid might be…
Suggested Topics
