Got it, I didn’t see that I also had a FAQ, was thinking I only had the CLASSIFIED clarification
Now I see my specific question is answered, the carriers could not even split up during a combat move that ends in the same place
@Dizz - I’d echo Balladeer’s thoughts he posted at Cellargaming. I think postponing the start til at least Dec would be best considering we still have a pretty good number of games left.
@Dizz - I’d echo Balladeer’s thoughts he posted at Cellargaming. I think postponing the start til at least Dec would be best considering we still have a pretty good number of games left.
Very cool, I say let’s focus on our games and then we can start the next one maybe Feb 15 to Mar 15? That will give us some recruiting time as well!
ACGTO 270 BC redrum (Roman alliance) v Bacala (Anti-Roman alliance)
redrum wins from Bacala
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38523.msg1587358#new
LOTR redrum(Good) over DizzKneeLand33(Evil)
And our first real point is scored with a fourth place finish for Dizzkneeland33 in LOTR!
270BC:
Balladeer [Sides: even is Roman, odd is Anti-Roman] vs EntekRolling 1d20:
(14)
TRS: Bacala (allies) over Balladeer (axis).
Well done, you got to me before I got to you :-)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38269.new#new
LOTR: Bacala over Balladeer
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38344.new#new
TAW: Bacala wins from Entek
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38697.msg1595263#new
Lord Of The Rings:
redrum [Sides: even is Good, odd is Evil] vs BalladeerRolling 1d20:
(8)
Total Ancient War:
Bacala vs Balladeer, 2nd game: Bacala = Anti-Romans, Balladeer = Romans
Geesh, Balladeer – 5/5 now on your Evilness… :evil:
ACGTO NE redrum (coalition) vs Bacala (carolingians)
redrum wins
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38524.msg1596715#new
So it is the Final, at last. I have been waiting since March.
Can you roll for sides, please Dizz?
@Wittmann - Technically its not the final yet as the winner of our game will then play the winner of the loser’s bracket for the true final. Either way best of luck :-)
Napoleonic Empires:
wittman [Sides: even is Coalition, odd is Carolingians] vs redrumRolling 1d20:
(16)
captain walker [Sides: even is Coalition, odd is Carolingians] vs BacalaRolling 1d20:
(1)
@Wittmann - Technically its not the final yet as the winner of our game will then play the winner of the loser’s bracket for the true final. Either way best of luck :-)
Thank you for explaining.
Good luck yourself.
My email: pontevecchio1@googlemail.com
Leo.
Lord Of The Rings:
redrum [Sides: even is Good, odd is Evil] vs Balladeer
Rolling 1d20:
(8)Total Ancient War:
Bacala vs Balladeer, 2nd game: Bacala = Anti-Romans, Balladeer = Romans
Woops, missed this post, I’ll set em both up ASAP
anybody want to play a game of 1 on 1 TRS in the play board game forum?
Balladeer over Entek in 270BC
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=38667.new#new
270 BC:
Balladeer vs Bacala, 2nd game: Bacala = Anti-Romans, Balladeer = Romans
–>Note to all: if your brackets do not update with the new information (using Chrome, for example) clearing the browsing data for pictures should do the trick. What a pain tho… love that the internet is less efficient that 20 years ago…
Hi All,
For the next tournament i would suggest changing the format. The double elemination is fun but has too many games on the loser side, it takes a very long time to finish a tournament. Maybe we could do a poule system(4 players), then all games in the first round can start at the same time. With the top two going to the konckout fase.
As for throwing a dice for the sides: i think bidding for which side to play would be fairer and more fun.
If we start a game every month or three weeks maybe we could start in january (at least 8 players in a tournament).
Let me know what you think.
Greetings, Bacala