Do you work in tech support or a customer service type job? You’re amazing!
XDAP2 PIT FIGHT Bad Dice (+100) v Boldman
-
OK, that’s different.
My 2nd post posted first. I got that error message after posting the first time, where it takes 1-2 minutes to post. After making the 1 edit I posted again, and it posted fast. So use the FIRST post that has the edit.
-
ok
-
6 hits in z37. OOL?
-
Damage battleships and carriers and lose 2 subs
-
OK so in round 2 I sunk a destroyer with my sub and got 5 more hits. OOL?
-
carriers, destroyers, and tac
-
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 3.9
Game History
Round: 8
Purchase Units - British
British buy 1 destroyer and 3 submarines; Remaining resources: 1 PUs;Purchase Units - UK_Pacific
UK_Pacific repair damage of 4x factory_minor; Remaining resources: 4 PUs;
UK_Pacific buy 1 mech_infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Combat Move - British
2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from Yunnan to 37 Sea Zone
1 submarine moved from 97 Sea Zone to 96 Sea ZoneCombat - British
Battle in 96 Sea Zone
British attack with 1 submarine
Italians defend with 1 transport
British win with 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7
Casualties for Italians: 1 transport
Battle in 37 Sea Zone
British attack with 2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers
Japanese defend with 2 battleships, 1 cruiser and 2 transports
British win with 2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 66
Casualties for Japanese: 2 battleships, 1 cruiser and 2 transportsNon Combat Move - British
2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 37 Sea Zone to Burma
4 aaGuns, 3 artilleries and 16 infantry moved from India to Burma
2 mech_infantrys moved from Egypt to Tobruk
1 armour and 3 mech_infantrys moved from Egypt to Trans-Jordan
2 armour, 2 artilleries, 4 infantry and 4 mech_infantrys moved from Iraq to Trans-Jordan
2 transports moved from 112 Sea Zone to 110 Sea Zone
2 artilleries and 1 infantry moved from United Kingdom to 110 Sea Zone
1 transport moved from 112 Sea Zone to 110 Sea Zone
1 artillery moved from United Kingdom to 110 Sea Zone
3 artilleries, 1 infantry and 3 transports moved from 110 Sea Zone to 112 Sea Zone
3 artilleries and 1 infantry moved from 112 Sea Zone to NorwayPlace Units - British
1 destroyer and 2 submarines placed in 81 Sea Zone
1 submarine placed in 106 Sea ZoneTurn Complete - British
Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 4
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 70 Sea Zone. Rolls: 5,3
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 71 Sea Zone. Rolls: 5,5
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 98 Sea Zone. Rolls: 4,2
British collect 24 PUs (4 lost to blockades); end with 25 PUs totalPlace Units - UK_Pacific
1 mech_infantry placed in IndiaTurn Complete - UK_Pacific
UK_Pacific collect 6 PUs; end with 6 PUs total
Some Units in India change ownership: 1 mech_infantry -
I landed your fighter in Shan state but you can move it to Malaya or Siam
-
You screwed it up
I would have lost my fighter to the Americans because I saw the follow up coming from the UK
You should have waited for a casualty choice. How are you going to handle this now? -
I think you need to re-roll the British attack, if you still want to make it, with my cruiser in the battle. I would have lost the fighter in round 3, OF COURSE
-
You have to re-roll the British attack in 37 if you still want to make it, because you can’t prove that you would have attacked if there were 2 cruisers and 2 battleships there. Sorry your brilliant luck will be wasted, but you screwed this up by taking my cruiser off and not asking me for a casualty choice
-
Certainly feel free to re-do anything you want after the USA combat phase if you need to, in light of this casualty choice.
-
you can’t prove that you would have attacked if there were 2 cruisers and 2 battleships there.
I don’t have to prove anything. In the first round my 4 planes got 2 hits and your 3 ships got 0 hits. I will give you 1 dice roll for the cruiser in round 1 and then reroll round 2 onward.
cruiser
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3) -
round 2.
2 fighters 1 tac
Rolls: 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 12@3,: (5, 1)1@4: (5)2 battleships and 2 transports
Rolls: 2@4; Total Hits: 02@4: (5, 5) -
You’re wrong - you DO have to prove it
You lose all your rights in making the wrong choice for me. You can’t prove that you still would have made the attack of 4 on 4 without re-rolling it. You went in thinking you were attacking 3 units with 4. Big difference.
-
You are calling me a liar?
-
No, you totally don’t get it, just like you didn’t get it when you took of my cruiser.
-
No matter who you are, you can’t prove that you would have made the attack 4 on 4 like you eagerly did with 4 on 3
You should not have chosen my casualty - you did it wrong, then you proceeded under the wrong set of circumstances, and now you’re resolving it in a way that is beneficial to you.
I already wrote my message to Gargantua. We’ll do whatever he says.
-
I was planning on the UK attack from the start, and then ANZAC will mop up z37 if anything is left which there won’t be. I kept your fighter instead of the cruiser because that was max defense which is the obvious thing 99.999999% of people would do.
-
WHAT???
Then 99.999999999% of people are stupid.
You screwed up the battle by not asking for a casualty choice, you got hella lucky, and you wonder why I’m upset. You haven’t shown any understanding at all - you’re not treating me like you’d want to be treated
Suggested Topics
