@sunkhareb said in Simon (Alliex+19) vs Sunkhareb (Axis) BM:
holy moly… shockingly bad dice lol
-3 Luftwaffe but you won all the important battles and kept the BB. Only lost inf in France. So could be worse.
shin ji over variance (allies +16)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36392.90
hobo (Allies +16) over Me1945
Axis-dominion over giallo(+20)
Pherman1215(axis) over mitler(allies +17)
calvinhobbesliker wins over oysteilo
Pherman1215 (Axis) over Cyanight (Allies +18)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36244.new;topicseen#new
Holy cow, Pherman on a rampage!! :-D
mike48484 over luckyinmaroon (+19)
Mitler (Allies +19) over champinoman (Axis)
15L G40 AeV (Axis) vs Arthur Bomber Harris (Allies +18)
Arthur Bomber Harris over AeV
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36173.135
Good game!
15L G40 AeV (Axis) vs Karl7 (Allies +18)
Karl7 over AeV nuff said
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36294.135
Note to my self:
Not try to defeat him, DEFEAT HIM!!
Thank you Gamerman, that cheered me up!
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=34959.new#new
Bmnielsen (axis) beats Gamerman01 (+16)
isn’t the way he plays this strategy frustratingly good? i don’t feel so bad now that i’m seeing other elites falling to it….
i know adam beat him, but i have to say that in that game germany blew more than twice as many bombers on taking london than what the calc average was saying (so TUV was around -100 instead of the average of -2), and that likely made the difference for the allies (not to take away from adam’s skilled gameplay)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=34959.new#new
Bmnielsen (axis) beats Gamerman01 (+16)
was this the dark skies strat at play?
Yes, Karl, and since you guys are already talking about it, I’ll have to say -
Otherwise I was trying hard not to complain
I got diced hard when attacking one of his main bomber stacks, and then he was able to turn around and sink a big American fleet with them. Earlier in the game, he destroyed a smaller American fleet with fewer losses than average.
I would have beat him if it wasn’t for extreme dice in Rome. I realize I risk sounding like a sore loser complaining about dice, but I think bmnielsen will agree about extreme luck in Rome. I had a good chance of taking the capital, to boot.
I’ll just make this very clear right now
I am pretty sure I had bmnielsen dead to rights if I got anything better than a bottom 20% result in Rome, but I got bottom TWO percent.
The Axis are very powerful no matter what strategy they use. I only had a 16 bid, but gave 21 to Ghost, an Allied specialist, in the championship game.
Bmnielsen is an elite player no matter what strategy he’s using, so a lot of his success is due to his A&A abilities, skill, and diligence, not just his bombers. Who else is beating everyone with dark skies?
isn’t the way he plays this strategy frustratingly good? i don’t feel so bad now that i’m seeing other elites falling to it….
i know adam beat him, but i have to say that in that game germany blew more than twice as many bombers on taking london than what the calc average was saying (so TUV was around -100 instead of the average of -2), and that likely made the difference for the allies (not to take away from adam’s skilled gameplay)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=34959.new#new
Bmnielsen (axis) beats Gamerman01 (+16)
We both had lucky and unlucky stretches, but I was ready to call it if London was anything close to average. Bmnielsen is a very good AA player, he could probably do just as well with another Axis strategy. The bomber strat may simply make the Axis advantage even more obvious.
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=36363.0
Hobo (Allies) Defeats Pherman1215 (Axis).