4d6<=2: 3, 1, 1, 4; Hits: 2
14L G40 AxisandAlliesPlayer (Allies +9) vs Shin Ji (Axis)
-
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 3.9
Game History
Round: 5
Purchase Units - Chinese
Trigger Chinese Loses Burma Road: Chinese has their production frontier changed to: productionChinese_Burma_Road_Closed
Chinese buy 2 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Combat Move - Chinese
1 fighter and 2 infantry moved from Sikang to ShensiCombat - Chinese
Battle in Shensi
Chinese attack with 1 fighter and 2 infantry
Japanese defend with 1 armour
Chinese win, taking Shensi from Japanese with 1 fighter and 2 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6
Casualties for Japanese: 1 armourNon Combat Move - Chinese
1 fighter moved from Shensi to Sikang
1 infantry moved from Sikang to SzechwanPlace Units - Chinese
2 infantry placed in SikangTurn Complete - Chinese
Chinese collect 4 PUs; end with 4 PUs total -
TripleA Move Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 3.9
Game History
Round: 5
Combat Move - British
1 infantry moved from Scotland to 109 Sea Zone
1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 109 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from 113 Sea Zone to Germany
1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from United Kingdom to 109 Sea Zone
1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 109 Sea Zone to 125 Sea Zone
1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 125 Sea Zone to Norway
1 infantry moved from India to 39 Sea Zone
1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 39 Sea Zone to 41 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from 41 Sea Zone to Sumatra -
Changing that art to a mech.
-
Cool beans.
-
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 3.9
Game History
Round: 5
Purchase Units - British
British buy 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Purchase Units - UK_Pacific
UK_Pacific buy 1 artillery and 1 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Combat Move - British
1 infantry moved from Scotland to 109 Sea Zone
1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 109 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from 113 Sea Zone to Germany
1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from United Kingdom to 109 Sea Zone
1 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 1 transport moved from 109 Sea Zone to 125 Sea Zone
1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 125 Sea Zone to Norway
1 infantry moved from India to 39 Sea Zone
1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 39 Sea Zone to 41 Sea Zone
1 infantry moved from 41 Sea Zone to SumatraCombat - British
Battle in Germany
British captures 59PUs while taking Germans capital
British converts factory_major into different units
Battle in Norway
Battle in SumatraNon Combat Move - British
1 carrier and 1 destroyer moved from 125 Sea Zone to 110 Sea Zone
2 fighters moved from Scotland to United Kingdom
2 aaGuns and 2 infantry moved from Scotland to United Kingdom
1 fighter moved from Persia to Egypt
3 infantry moved from Iraq to Trans-Jordan
1 infantry moved from Persia to Eastern Persia
1 mech_infantry moved from Persia to West India
3 aaGuns, 2 artilleries, 18 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Burma to India
1 battleship and 1 cruiser moved from 39 Sea Zone to 55 Sea ZonePlace Units - British
1 transport placed in 110 Sea Zone
3 mech_infantrys placed in Persia
1 artillery and 1 fighter placed in Union of South Africa
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by British from Union of South Africa: 1 artillery
EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Union of South Africa: 1 mech_infantry
EDIT: Turning off Edit ModeTurn Complete - British
British collect 41 PUs; end with 100 PUs totalPlace Units - UK_Pacific
1 artillery and 1 infantry placed in IndiaTurn Complete - UK_Pacific
UK_Pacific collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs total
Some Units in India change ownership: 1 artillery and 1 infantry -
That 100 looks simply divine. :evil:
-
Satanic is more like it. Never seen anyone do this before.
-
Well, no. I have seen that before!
Gah! The classic blunder!
-
@Shin:
Satanic is more like it.� Never seen anyone do this before.
It’s actually a pretty common move. I’ll be honest though, I’ve never seen anyone pull it off when there was a single US transport with nothing to support it in the Atlantic. Usually US needs enough in the area to force Germany to stay grounded and/or get wiped out if they did scramble. :-D
I was stupid enough to let people do it do me twice before I finally learned my lesson. :|
-
See, I blame posting while punchy from sleep deprivation. I knew all about that move!
Oh well. This game has been a series of poorly thought out experiments anyway.
-
It’s early as hell, but I’m ready to call it. That’s too big of a screw up to really come back from, even though japan is doing really well.
Want a rematch?
-
I wasn’t sure if you would call it or not as I didn’t know your temperment. I know I would probably have called it. And I disagree with how well Japan’s doing. I think they’ve crested. Although it’s entirely possible they might take out India, but I still think they’re about reached their peak. But that’s just my opinion.
I’ll take a rematch. Rebid or same bids?
-
Same bid is fine for me. Sub off Egypt, Inf in NG.
-
@Shin:
Same bid is fine for me. Sub off Egypt, Inf in NG.
I take it you want the allies with that bid if I’m interpreting that correct?
Ah, well that’s not the same bid. We’re switching bids. :wink:
-
? When I think same bid I think same numerical value.
-
Well, switching sides then. :-D
I just wanted to be clear of who was going to play the allies and who got to play the evil warlord as your post was a little ambiguous. I’m not opposed with you being the allies at +9, I just wanted to ensure I knew whether I needed to start the game off or wait for you to start the game.
-
Well, it’s not like anyone bids for the Axis anymore, eh? :mrgreen:
Yes, we’re switiching sides. I will play the Allies, and you will play the Axis.
Probably just as well, since I seem to be better at Allies anyway.
-
@Shin:
Probably just as well, since I seem to be better at Allies anyway.
Hehe, why do you think I went so low to grab the allies from you? :wink:
I took a peak at your record and figured I was better off sticking to your weak suit than playing you to your strength. :evil:
Game up soon.