Attack Alaska

Moving this to the Axis and Allies Forum.

why should you attack the american fleet? america can’t land on japan if they wanted to.

please help me if my strat is flawed. if you use the carrier to assist on the attack on India and if america decides to build up in pacific, just bring your fleet to japan and defend.

if america builds up fully in the east, don’t they waste valuable resources of attacking germany?

yeah but japan wastes sorly neede resources in asia, to aid Germany.

Japan could care less about the American fleet…if Germany could.

Well look at it this way. If you don’t attack the Americans at Pearl Harbor they can transport their fleet through to Panama Canal to the Atlantic. This mears, not only do the Americas save a valuable ftr. but they no longer need to spend money to build a Navy capable of meeting the German Luftwaffe head on. This greatly speeds up the invasion of Western Europe, Germany, or Africa.

britain can build a carrier in turn one, and if america helps out with the little resources they have on turn one to protect the carrier, germany would have to delay an attack on karelia if they diverted aircraft. all works ti the allies advantage.

Yes. Definately I would build a carrier for UK first turn with either USSR or USA planes reinforcing it. Germany would be stupid to attack such a floating fortress.

And building an aircraft carrier also serves to take more resources from asia; how convenient. Just letting Japan have India and most of the surrounding territorys is always high on my list as Britian.

On 2002-03-12 17:01, bossk wrote:
And building an aircraft carrier also serves to take more resources from asia; how convenient. Just letting Japan have India and most of the surrounding territorys is always high on my list as Britian.

I’m assuming this is meant to be sarcastic. if so, I wholeheartedly agree…

Ozone27

What use is it if India is to be taken by Japan on the very first turn?