2014 G40 league rules

I think that the term “friendly” is used in the same context as the Dutch territories are to UK Pacific and ANZAC.  You can land a “friendly” plane there, but you don’t actually take the territory until you place a land unit in it.

The only distinctions btw friendly and pro are that aircraft can land in friendly and aircraft can fly over friendly without restriction.

One final clarification… triplea doesn’t handle the neutrals correctly in almost every regard so beware.

@Gamerman01:

Yeah you already said that  :-)

don’t think i can stress it enough.  reading your post, one might think tripleA could possibly be trusted in come cases to do something right…  :wink:

@Gamerman01:

@Boldfresh:

reading your post, one might think tripleA could possibly be trusted in come cases to do something right…  :wink:

I have no idea what you’re talking about

“There is no such thing as declaring war on the neutrals, so if you click declare war on neutrals in Triple A but then don’t actually attack one, then you actually haven’t done anything and no territories will change.”

This is the sentence i was referring to.  Not sure how each and every person would interpret this so wanted to reiterate that no matter what tripleA does, do not trust it to do anything correctly when it comes to the neutrals.

Imho you are dramatizing the issue.

Most of the time it doesn’t affect your plane paths at all. Only very few cases (like India -> TRJ) are really important.

Other than that, I have not needed to edit anything so far.

@MrRoboto:

Imho you are dramatizing the issue.

Most of the time it doesn’t affect your plane paths at all. Only very few cases (like India -> TRJ) are really important.

Other than that, I have not needed to edit anything so far.

roboto:  what does that mean dramatizing the issue?

It appears you have to be super careful whenever you are doing something with neutrals - attacking them, flying over them, walking into them…

In my experience you almost never have to give them special treatment.

Gamer I knew what you meant just wast sure others would so wanted to give one more disclaimer to tripleA, which we all of course love.  Some of us just wish the developers understood the rules and some of the nuances of the game a little better.

I thought I needed to get in 8 games before the season ended. I will do.
Would someone explain why I thought this was the necessary number and for what exactly?
Thank you.
And I am not drunk!

Apologies. Have just gone to page 1 for the answer.
Pretend I am drunk.

One question……in the bid is possible for China to place units that are not infantries or artilleries…for example you can place a tank or a fighter in Yunnan with the bid?

thanks

We will probably limit Chinese bid units to Infantry, Artillery and Fighters in the future however.  We have just failed to do so up until this point and I am not a fan of suddenly altering things in the middle of a league year, which is why we have not changed it.

We’ll have a league rule discussion over what should be changed, added or removed later….probably early October.

thank you for your answers, it´s an interesting issue……in my opinion it must be forbidden too in the bid the use of fighters for the chinese…but probably will open amazing oportunities too

I am not in favor of preventing you from being permitted to bid for units China can legally have in the game.  My only concern is if we should allow them to bid for mech infantry or tanks.  One tank in Yunnan could have drastic changes on game play.