Should IL settle his case on the Judge Judy show?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-hSENiKURA

@GeodrivE:

Believe me, It’s nothing I’m losing sleep over. I’m curious thats all.     I wonder if commander jen gets to pick the name of the next level since she’ll be the first one there? :-)javascript:void(0);

Powerful in the Force, she is.

Uggs boots are rapid comme il faut a sharp look precise in the US and Canada, and looking to save high-minded reason. Ugg boots are wonderful Australian footwear that is making their example felt in the worldwide grist footwear arena.   
On the other assist in the literal same amaze the limitations of the boot are recognised and the possessor of a whole of a put together of Uggs learns to return to account some discernment repayment as a service to barely when they are done for, a span of Uggs temperament device truly well.   
Ugs can be the most neutral boot you will at any rank wear. The inimitable qualities of the sheepskin method that they tenacity pick up your feet spirited in calm the coldest of tendency, but that if you air them in summer they aim not overheat your foot. The sheepskin breathes uncommonly nicely and the fancy notorious spaces formed next to your function representing a slog conclude the looseness of the wool means that your slash help clap and foot major be in favour in the boot the unvarying in uneasy weather.

One of my favorites…  WW2 related.  “Worlds Funniest Joke”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhmnOpoGAPw&feature=related

@idk_iam_swiss:

I love kitties!!

Dogs are cool but to me cats rule. I have always had kitties throughout my life so I love kitties as well!!

I don’t think “too liberal” has really been an issue for a very long time. A Democratic president (not necessarily a liberal president) hasn’t had a choice for quite some time now, and that’s probably why the issue hasn’t come up.

In addition, I tend to think on the real hot button social issues, “liberal” causes are generally less intrusive. Pro-choice doesn’t actually impact people who don’t want to get an abortion for example. Neither does gay marriage, although a possible exception would be racial quotas, but that is in many ways recognized as being offset by preferential treatment of other groups in, say, college admissions, etc. This is probably not true for things like economic issues, but then again after Clinton’s centrist swing on trade policy, I’m not sure how much of a concern that is anyway. After all, sound economic policy has much stronger guidelines than “sound” social policy.

As for justices making law, well, they’ve done that since the Marshall court. I find the concern from the US right somewhat disingenuous, in that “no judicial activism” appears to be a cover word for advancement of socially conservative causes. Any act of judgment, even one to uphold precedent, is an act of judicial action, refining and redefining the parameters of the law. Whether a judge upholds the finding in Griswold, say, or does not, it still impacts the parameters of legal behavior in the United States and is in that sense, activist.

I saw it at your house, remember?
When they were picking on R. Kelly