@Imperious:
That is never my point. I was saying they have really nice restaurants ( at least in my area) that prepare very healthy meals, which taste better than you can make at home and no mess to clean up.
You can pay alot and still get crap or eat at home and still eat crap. Yes some restaurants add alot of really bad ingredients to make it taste better, but you just got to avoid those.
You can also be a selfless asshole AND HAVE KIDS. Don’t fool yourself.
Certainly there are, but it’s not the aim for meals at restaurants. Sure, they are getting into the healthier option now, but the number 1 reason we go out to eat is for taste. Also, anyone that goes out an orders just salads should kill themselves.
You have far more control over your diet and nutrition at home. Some restaurants don’t even have nutritional info or will tell you the ingredients.
Also, I’m more talking about raising kids. Nearly anyone can have kids, that’s not the hard part.
You can be fooled by that, but what really is going on is time is money for some people. It is not really a lack of ability but in some cases like anything else it can be.
Money is also money to everyone. You can’t get a better deal eating at home. I understand: no dishes, certain dishes can’t be made without investing in hardware/ingredients, exotic stuff that takes some time to get the recipe down. Some people don’t change their oil even though it’s easy. I get that. But we’re talking about a fundamental need for everyone - it seems silly to never ever cook. If you can get by, go for it, but you better learn quick when the zombie apocalypse comes.
Yes it’s liberating to be able to push the ON button. Agreed

Yeah…even that kit isn’t as simple as you say. Too bad I don’t use that crap. I go all grain and in a much larger quantity (around 6-7 gallons). It typically takes about 6 hours to do, and is more or less cooking. But it’s probably Greek to you.
@frimmel:
@Jermofoot:
And it’s dumb to say a woman can only be liberated by having a career.
That is not what I’m saying. My point is rather that being a stay at home mom who expects her husband to cook his own meals is not liberated. It is just picking and choosing the parts of equality she likes and passing off the rest. Even women with jobs seem to think the proper division of labor regarding meals is:
They cook, they clean up.
She cooks, man cleans up.
Man cooks, man cleans up.
That’s entitlement, not liberation.
Now NAWALT. Now granted perhaps some of the child rearing duties (rides to practices and lessons for example) might interfere with cooking but that isn’t what I was referring to. My objection is not to women’s liberation but to feminine double standards.
I was more referring to IL, and mostly agree with you, but let’s not bunch all radical feminists with women here. In my experience, it’s been mostly equitable: whoever doesn’t cook gets to clean up. Of course certain favors may change that rule…