The Big Egypt gambit (long)

@andrewaagamer I think there is a counter to this meta (with the bid) that still favors the Allies. However, that’s out of scope.

Thanks for the input!

Dude, do you not have a freaking copy of the rulebook or the technology chart?!?  READ IT!!!

Just relax!!! :mrgreen:

@Der:

@dezrtfish:

Try the “find players forum”.  Post you location and contact info.  Good luck.

A link would be nice there boss….call me lazy!

:-D

Get off your lazy butt & look through the site! Also check out the “games in progress” forum where there are several games being played now on this site via e-mail.
  :-D

well i just tried the tek thing:

I agreed to give germany +2 men in eastern europe. Russia for some reason didn’t defend karelia very well, and it fell hard. Then germany lands it’s air in western europe, and uk get’s lucky and destroys all but 2 fighters. Then I roll 6 tek, get heavy bombers and super subs. So I kill the remaining fighters. Sadly russia wouln’t listen to me, and doesn’t defend russia, instead takes more territories from japan (giving money to germany) russia falls, and we surrender because the axis will easily get 84.

But if russia didn’t play so bad it would have worked…

USA should help but it is not a priority usa does this by sendig its eastern fighter to the most western part of africa it can also send its bomber but that would be unwise (you can probrbly geuse why) :lol:

That’s exectly what disussion should be about.
And this site certainly helped me to get better.

I also like Zero’s approach. The Americans usually end up reinforcing the British in the south, while the Brits and Yanks drop infantry into Karelia (if indeed, the allies are strong there). This gives the Russians a chance to move some stuff east.

Oh, and what’s with up with all the Patton quotes? I seems like a lot of people I meet nowadays has them. Better not be left out…