Gas Attacks

In this instance I am prepared to say that, WWLD can be easily answered with the statement “making a shameless cash in at the opportune moment”. I hate to sound bitter, but it is clear that Larry neither understands nor respects the subject matter he is dealing with. WOTC would like him to make a big sack of money form them and saw an opportunity. Us historians and students of the period are noting but a bunch of insignificant gnats buzzing in the ear of a giant who can drown us out by stuffing more of the money it’s going to make of this title in its ear.

:cry: :cry: :cry:

@Clyde85:

In this instance I am prepared to say that, WWLD can be easily answered with the statement “making a shameless cash in at the opportune moment”. I hate to sound bitter, but it is clear that Larry neither understands nor respects the subject matter he is dealing with. WOTC would like him to make a big sack of money form them and saw an opportunity. Us historians and students of the period are noting but a bunch of insignificant gnats buzzing in the ear of a giant who can drown us out by stuffing more of the money it’s going to make of this title in its ear.Â

:cry: :cry: :cry:

I think a year or two ago I would have really disagreed with you, since Larry wasn’t making a dime (as far as I could tell) from the work he was doing on all the Alpha’s and the immense amount of time he was spending (wasting?) listening to dozens of people who had each “proven” problems that needed to be fixed and happened to have the perfect solutions to those “problems,” but then 2nd ed. came out and he made lots of dimes lol.

Gas attacks might be (or should be) something like roll a die for each unit in the gas attacked area each time you roll a one the unit is destroyed. Something akin to how aircraft worked in D-Day. But you’re rollling for your own units also.

@Flashman:

See this on gas:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItsfvJyymjw&feature=endscreen&NR=1

Note also from this prog:

Importance of observation balloons.

Tanks were useless in defence.

Really, we need at least 10 tech units (remember this isn’t Risk):

Gas (as a 3rd type of shell)
Anti-Aircraft battery
Armoured trains

Light tanks (FT17)
Medium tanks (Whippet)
Heavy tanks (M series)

Pursuit aircraft (3-3) (Eindekker, Nieuport, DH2)
Fighter aircraft (4-4) (Albatross, Sopwith, Spad)
Medium bombers (Breugeot)
Heavy bombers (H-P O series, Gotha)

Aircraft carrier (Furious)

3 different kinds of tanks? 2 different kinds of fighters? 2 different kinds of bombers? You do know this is Axis and Allies the board game. Not Axis and Allies minis.

@Yavid:

Gas attacks might be (or should be) something like roll a die for each unit in the gas attacked area each time you roll a one the unit is destroyed. Something akin to how aircraft worked in D-Day. But you’re rollling for your own units also.

this is of course if there is a stack limit in the game

Looking at statistics from gas attacks, it seems that as killing agents they were ineffective, but as demoralizing tools they were more effective. Thus to me it makes more sense to have gas reduce defense of infantry than it does to kill them. Even though both happened of course, the latter was much less common.

3 different kinds of tanks? 2 different kinds of fighters? 2 different kinds of bombers? You do know this is Axis and Allies the board game. Not Axis and Allies minis.

British heavy and French light tanks were completely different vehicles with different roles.

There was a constant arms race in the air, with supremacy changing several times as opposing sides introduced new and better aircraft designs.

How can you have no bombers in the game? This is the perfect definition of a tech - an effective new type of unit introduced about halfway through the conflict.

OK, I was going a little too far (I want loads of cool aircraft minis). To cut it down to 6 (why is 6 such a sacred number - is it the number of The Lord Larry?)

1. Gas shells

2. Tanks (in this case it would have to be the British and German heavies, ignoring the French FT17 light model that was produced in greater numbers than all the other types put together)

3. Anti-Aircraft guns

4. Bombers

5. At least one more type of aircraft. This depends on which is represented initially; but there should be a “reconnaissance” type (2 seater, long-range, poorly armed) and a fighter type (1 seater, short-range, armed with ffsmgs). The Rec planes should be the starting units, the first effective fighters introduced in 1915 (Fokker Scourge) being the tech.

6. Rail Guns

I don’t see that forts are techs - there were plenty around in 1914. I’m assuming that places like Galicia, Belgium and Eastern France would have them at setup.

@Flashman:

British heavy and French light tanks were completely different vehicles with different roles.

There was a constant arms race in the air, with supremacy changing several times as opposing sides introduced new and better aircraft designs.

The same thing can be said about WW2 but still each power only gets 1 fighter

@Flashman:

How can you have no bombers in the game? This is the perfect definition of a tech - an effective new type of unit introduced about halfway through the conflict.

Samething can be said of Jet Fighters and no special unit for them either. I personally believe that A&A should do an expansion pack with Tech Units in them such as Jet Fighters and Heavy Tanks, but that’s another conversation.

@Flashman:

1. Gas shells

Axis and Allies has never had a unit anything like you purpose here.

@Flashman:

2. Tanks (in this case it would have to be the British and German heavies, ignoring the French FT17 light model that was produced in greater numbers than all the other types put together)
[/qoute]

Axis and Allies also ignores that Japanese tanks were nothing when compared to the T-34 or the Panther but they get the same stats. So again speaking from an A&A perpective there is no need to have them as different. (I personally believe there should be heavy tanks)

“Axis and Allies has never had a unit anything like you purpose here.”

That’s because gas wasn’t used in WWII, at least not in combat. Different war, different rules.

@Flashman:

“Axis and Allies has never had a unit anything like you purpose here.”

That’s because gas wasn’t used in WWII, at least not in combat. Different war, different rules.

V-1s and V-2s could have been in Axis and Allies and used like your gas shells and they didn’t make the cut either

I see a lot of posts in this thread and others saying that “this is axis & allies, not <name a=”" game=“”>."

I think we have to remember that Tactical Bombers and scrambling and combat air patrol and major and minor factories and tech tokens and cruisers and NO’s and NA’s and submerging, and on and on were not always in the game. What counts as Axis & Allies is always changing.</name>

@Imperious:

World in Flames is where you got uber detailed rules that add nothing to the fun factor of the game. All they do is get in the way of a good gaming experience.

Chrome rules that add detail , but nothing else are not axis and allies.

I totally agree, and after all this years its nice to see that the King of complicated houserules finally understand the consept of Axis & Allies  :-D

@Imperious:

Tactical Bombers and scrambling and combat air patrol and major and minor factories and tech tokens and cruisers and NO’s and NA’s and submerging…

None of this is world in flames.

World in Flames is where you got uber detailed rules that add nothing to the fun factor of the game. All they do is get in the way of a good gaming experience.

Chrome rules that add detail , but nothing else are not axis and allies.

Also Agree some of the rules in WiF are just insane,we did however borrow some stuff from it to pimp up A&A Global
Vichy France mainly.

Well, it has rockets as a tech. Where Larry got the idea of firing rockets from AA guns I’ll never know; clearly they should have been stand-alone units fired from wherever you like.

@Yavid:

@Flashman:

“Axis and Allies has never had a unit anything like you purpose here.”

That’s because gas wasn’t used in WWII, at least not in combat. Different war, different rules.

V-1s and V-2s could have been in Axis and Allies and used like your gas shells and they didn’t make the cut either

@Flashman:

Well, it has rockets as a tech. Where Larry got the idea of firing rockets from AA guns I’ll never know; clearly they should have been stand-alone units fired from wherever you like.

@Yavid:

@Flashman:

“Axis and Allies has never had a unit anything like you purpose here.”

That’s because gas wasn’t used in WWII, at least not in combat. Different war, different rules.

V-1s and V-2s could have been in Axis and Allies and used like your gas shells and they didn’t make the cut either

that goes back to Axis and Allies should have an expansion so V-1 and V-2s could be a tech unit

You want gas attacks???  Just fart at your opponent while playing.  There’s your gas attacks.  Don’t forget to wear a mask.