Rule clarification regarding submarines

Yea my bad, makes sense that the attacking sub would have the choice to submerge in the sz that the battle took place (no enemy dd present), or retreat 1 adjacent sz from where it came.

@Fatespinner:

But what about unloading into a friendly land during non-combat. Can the sub there also be just ignored? I think the OP question is concerned about this and not amphibious assault.

See Private Panic’s answer above.

Thank you

The US can choose to fight the battles in either order, but it won’t matter. Defending planes that lose the carrier holding them in combat get 1 movement to land after the Combat phase is done, so at that point it would already be determined if they had a friendly place to land regardless of the battle order. The landing is done after the whole combat phase to avoid confusion of planes getting to defend twice, which they don’t.

Any clue when we’ll get to see the rules?
I have original copy of first ed and would wandt to print those rules.

Thx!

@Gravy:

2)Can subs pass through the straits even if you don’t control Denmark, Gibraltar and Turkey?

@GrizzlyMan:

2. I think they can, but I want a second opinion on this

Subs can move through Gibraltar, but can’t move through the other two.

@Krieghund:

“On its next turn”, not “for the next turn”.

Thank you!