I’m still not sure that this aspect of the tech discussion belongs here since it is more about a house rule but I mentioned how we have developed a progressive valued chart for the techs but I didn’t give the limitations of attaining the tech. A tech die is three (3) IPC’s every tern a player wants to roll for a tech. A neutral nation can roll one die only per rounf thatthey are neutral. That is three IPC’s per round. If a tech has a R&D value of 25, it may take a nation at least 5 rounds to develop that tech. That is at least 15 IPC’s in order to develop a tech. A nation that is war may invest in three dice (9IPC’s) per rounf in order to develop three different tech.'s at a time. They can not be applied to a single tech but must be spread over the three techs to be develpoed. It can get expensive but the thought process is this; a country will invest in R&D to develop a specific technology. It will not just through money at a problem and randomly hope to get a good result….governments maybe but not gamers. If and when we play with technology, I prefer this R&D chart. The Anniversary/Global chart and dice costs can definately thow the balance of the game off. Last game I played of global 1940, theAmerican player shelled out alot of IPC’s on tech. It put his production behind and the other allied player had to really hold on for the US to catch up but the US player was able to develop long range heavy bombers and cheaper ships. It was devostating to the the axis player (me) because he then went dark skies on the axis and it became a war of attrition that I could not repulse effectively. I have to take this moment to say I love Narvik. Direct and to the point. Tech is fun sometimes but there is alot to just playing the game.
Global 1940.2 IPC & VC Tracking Chart
-
I created this for my brother and friends and they thought that maybe it would help people here. It is a single chart that can be printed out and laminated at 11x17. There will be some area to trim. Each marker will fit the roundels.
IPC Chart
1. The IPC chart goes to 84 (still better than what’s standard on the board). Believe me, I wanted to go higher.
2. Marked off each country’s/power’s staring income with their roundel and a picture of an appropriate leader. Italy got Mussolini (shared space with ANZAC who I skipped), China got Mao/Chiang Kai-shek (newer photo of Mao… sorry), UK controlled India got Claude Auchinleck (too many decisions with the back and forth on C&Cs in that theater), France got Charles de Gaulle, Japan got Tojo, UK got Winston Churchill, Germany got Hitler, USSR got Stalin, US got FDR. I just had to make decisions here… so I tried to go with the most recognizable/pertinent leaders (in my opinion). Your ideas may differ, which is cool too.Victory Cities Tracking Chart
The lower section of the board is dedicated to keeping track of the victory city conditions (Axis Europe, Axis Pacific, and Allies).
Each section here has the Victory Cities labeled along with the original controlling power’s Roundel (so you can save yours for other purposes).I hope this helps somebody.
-
here are his links:
Small Scale Preview:
http://www.mediafire.com/conv/04bfa409a61369b495e4e76f5be27eb5106258375c82cc82b163e5fa1fa4b1516g.jpgDownload Link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?voyfpyl9ycd35yu -
Thank you! I appreciate it Imperious Leader.
-
I like them !!!
But I’m bummed that you skipped ANZAC :x
I’d rather have Menzies then Benito !!!
-
NP
-
I like them !!!
But I’m bummed that you skipped ANZAC :x
I’d rather have Menzies then Benito !!!
Thanks!
I thought about splitting that one… but the Axis only has 3 places that they can be represented on the IPC chart with leader photos, so I opted for Benito. C’mon… at least he got the trains to run on time!
Also, maybe I should have just put Germany or Italy’s roundel on Paris in the VC section. After all, it’s not like France still controls Paris by the end of Round 1… Heck, all they have left by then is some troops stumbling around in the African desert, haha
-
No you need De Gaulle
……and I like those “lost patrols” in the desert and the last couple of games they have actually done good things !
(they were able to bring done the fighter from England to lend some punch to their attacks -
No you need De Gaulle
……and I like those “lost patrols” in the desert and the last couple of games they have actually done good things !
(they were able to bring done the fighter from England to lend some punch to their attacksHaha, yeah, the Paris roundel thing was just a joke since Paris is taken so soon.
Nice one on the using the “lost patrols” so effectively! I know they can be used to do good things, just have to get them there (and I’m an impatient man) :-D





