@GeneralDisarray Game History
Round: 1 Bid Purchase - Germans Germans buy 1 artillery and 1 submarine; 0 PU unused Bid Placement - Germans 1 submarine placed in 120 Sea Zone 1 artillery placed in Holland Belgium Purchase Units - Germans Germans buy 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Trigger Germans 6 Atlantic Wall Broken Switch: Setting switch to false for conditionAttachment_Germans_6_Atlantic_Wall_Possible_Switch attached to Germans Combat Move - Germans 2 submarines moved from 120 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 106 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 111 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 121 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 127 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 battleship moved from 116 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Norway to 114 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Holland Belgium to 113 Sea Zone 2 fighters moved from Western Germany to 113 Sea Zone 3 tactical_bombers moved from Western Germany to 113 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 113 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to Normandy Bordeaux 1 armour moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 1 artillery, 3 infantry and 2 mech_infantrys moved from Western Germany to France 3 armour and 3 mech_infantrys moved from Austria to France 2 artilleries and 6 infantry moved from Austria to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from Romania to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 2 infantry moved from Slovakia Hungary to Yugoslavia 1 armour moved from Poland to Yugoslavia 1 fighter moved from Poland to Yugoslavia 1 artillery moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 armour, 2 artilleries and 3 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to France Combat - Germans Battle in 109 Sea Zone Germans attack with 2 submarines British defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport British win with 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -4 Casualties for Germans: 2 submarines Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Battle in 113 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 bomber, 3 fighters, 2 submarines and 3 tactical_bombers British defend with 1 battleship and 1 cruiser; French defend with 1 cruiser Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Germans win with 1 bomber, 3 fighters, 1 submarine and 3 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 34 Casualties for French: 1 cruiser Casualties for Germans: 1 submarine Casualties for British: 1 battleship and 1 cruiser Battle in 114 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Germans win with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 37 Casualties for British: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in Yugoslavia Germans attack with 3 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 9 infantry Neutral_Allies defend with 5 infantry Germans win, taking Yugoslavia from Neutral_Allies with 3 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 8 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 12 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for Neutral_Allies: 5 infantry Battle in Normandy Bordeaux Germans attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Germans win, taking Normandy Bordeaux from French with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in France Germans attack with 5 armour, 3 artilleries, 6 infantry and 5 mech_infantrys British defend with 1 armour and 1 artillery; French defend with 1 aaGun, 1 airfield, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 factory_major, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Germans captures 19PUs while taking French capital Germans converts factory_major into different units Germans win, taking France from French with 5 armour, 2 artilleries and 5 mech_infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 31 Casualties for Germans: 1 artillery and 6 infantry Casualties for French: 1 aaGun, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Casualties for British: 1 armour and 1 artillery Trigger Germans Conquer France: Setting switch to true for conditionAttachment_French_1_Liberation_Switch attached to French triggerFrenchDestroyPUsGermans: Setting destroysPUs to true for playerAttachment attached to French Non Combat Move - Germans 1 bomber, 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers moved from 113 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 tactical_bomber moved from 114 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 114 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 114 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 tactical_bomber moved from Normandy Bordeaux to Western Germany 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to France 1 aaGun moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 aaGuns, 3 artilleries and 11 infantry moved from Germany to Poland 1 infantry moved from Romania to Bulgaria Germans take Bulgaria from Neutral_Axis 1 fighter moved from Yugoslavia to Southern Italy 1 infantry moved from Norway to Finland Germans take Finland from Neutral_Axis 1 cruiser and 1 transport moved from 117 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from Norway to Finland 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to 115 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Denmark to 115 Sea Zone 1 aaGun and 1 infantry moved from 115 Sea Zone to Norway 1 infantry moved from Denmark to Western Germany Place Units - Germans 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 transport placed in 115 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 41 PUs; end with 60 PUs Trigger Germans 5 Swedish Iron Ore: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 65 PUs Objective Germans 1 Trade with Russia: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 70 PUs2013 - AAG 40 League
-
God will not permit this! He will not allow me not to fulfill my destiny!
General George S. Patton…but I forgot where I heard it
-
Okay guys, thanks for your answers.
I dont feel so bad now after having bumped my opponent.
-
Okay guys, thanks for your answers.
I dont feel so bad now after having bumped my opponent.
Good. You shouldn’t. That’s what the rule’s there for. :-)
-
God will not permit this! He will not allow me not to fulfill my destiny!
General George S. Patton…but I forgot where I heard it
The movie, I believe.
-
For all the guys i am playing with or those who are interested in playing me , I am in Dubrovnik on summer vacation for 7-10 days. I wanted to write this message earlier but the page was not working. Cheers :)
-
@Cmdr:
God will not permit this!� He will not allow me not to fulfill my destiny!
General George S. Patton…but I forgot where I heard it
The movie, I believe.
correct! :mrgreen:
-
FYI if the playoffs started now or very soon, these are (APPROXIMATELY) who would probably be in them:
RGP44, 7-0, 1.000, #2
Alexgreat, 9-0, 1.000, #7
Allweneedislove, 19-2, .905, #1
Zhukov, 8-1, .889, #4
Gamerman01, 21-3, .875, #3
Arathorn, 6-2, .750, #13
Hobo, 11-4, .733, #9
Ziggurat, 16-6, .727, #6Nobody can argue this is a good group for the playoffs.
However, by rankings, these players would be excluded:
#5 Hank13 (10-4, .714)
#8 Cow (10-4, .714)Note that these players could easily qualify by the end of the year by win% (current rules) but yes if they really wanted to be in the playoffs then they will pick weaker opponents.
Hank and Cow are ranked #5 and #8 using my system but are not in the top 8 by win % because they play tougher competition.
Half of Cow’s games were played vs. tier 1. Only 3 were below tier 2.
Half of Hank’s games were played vs. tier 1, with very few against below tier 2.So there’s the difference between straight win % and a strength of schedule calculation such as my own.
I think having 3 tournament/playoff at the end of the year that excludes no one but the tier 4’s (I’ll call them apprentices) would alleviate the concerns about the playoff qualification/determination, and include everyone who wants, in the fun.
Winner of the tier 1 playoff is crowned winner of the league for the year.What do you think, Jenn?
Just wanted to remind Jenn to include the games (I think 4 total) that are legitimate League wins, but that were not counted in Gamerman’s rankings.
-
Just wondering when the 2014 season starts - is it Jan 1, or Oct sometime?
-
@Cmdr:
7a - The Regular Season for each league will start on 2 Nov. 2012 and end on 1 Nov. 2012 and the standings will then be posted. Games must be completed prior to this date in order to be counted for the 2012 season.
7b - Any games in progress that are completed after this date will be eligible to count for the next league (2013) assuming league rules remain the same or are similar.
7c - 2013 Playoffs begin Nov 2nd
November 2
Although I think it would be a good idea to make next year a 14 month year so that it ends 12/31/14, and then ever after it can go with the calendar year, for simplicity.
We will have at least 3 playoffs of 8 people each starting in November, so there won’t be as many regular season games being played in November/December anyway.
What do you think about phasing out the fiscal year, Jenn? Fix it by having a 14 month year once? I don’t know how many times people have had to ask when the league year starts and ends. A lot of confusion could be averted with a 1/1 - 12/31 year -
Although I think it would be a good idea to make next year a 14 month year so that it ends 12/31/14, and then ever after it can go with the calendar year, for simplicity.
We will have at least 3 playoffs of 8 people each starting in November, so there won’t be as many regular season games being played in November/December anyway.
What do you think about phasing out the fiscal year, Jenn? Fix it by having a 14 month year once? I don’t know how many times people have had to ask when the league year starts and ends. A lot of confusion could be averted with a 1/1 - 12/31 yearWouldn’t that make the playoffs start in 2015 for the 2014 season?
I like to see the playoffs attempt to end in the same year as the season. Personally, I’d run the regular season to end in Sept, to give an extra month for the playoff brackets.
-
We will have at least 3 playoffs of 8 people each starting in November, so there won’t be as many regular season games being played in November/December anyway.
What about allowing the playoff games to also count for next year’s league, if both players agree?
-
We will have at least 3 playoffs of 8 people each starting in November, so there won’t be as many regular season games being played in November/December anyway.
What about allowing the playoff games to also count for next year’s league, if both players agree?
now there’s a fantastic idea!!! i love it.
-
We will have at least 3 playoffs of 8 people each starting in November, so there won’t be as many regular season games being played in November/December anyway.
What about allowing the playoff games to also count for next year’s league, if both players agree?
in fact, i think it should not be a both players agree thing, i think it should be mandatory. give me one reason why it shouldn’t be!
-
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhOB4pSke42ydF93TUcwNFB2Y1JvYm9weThsdzV0cEE#gid=0
Sign up for the playoffs here, even if it currently looks like you will be in the top 8. In case you don’t end up in the top 8, you will be signed up then.
Only 1 requirement - 4 completed league games by 11/1/13.
We currently have enough for 2 additional playoffs, for a total of 3. If we have enough signups there will be a 4th bracket.
I don’t have a reason against playoff games also counting for 2014 league other than it feels weird because it is never done in any sport at any level that I am aware of. However, it does seem to make sense for our purposes. After all, the rankings take into account strength of schedule…. so as long as next year’s playoff qualification is not determined by win % but by PPG…
-
Regarding signup for 2013 playoffs -
You are signing up for 1-3 games. No bracket will take more than 3 games to win. -
I don’t have a reason against playoff games also counting for 2014 league other than it feels weird because it is never done in any sport at any level that I am aware of.
There really is no connection that I can see. What is “our” purpose, then? The only thing that makes sense to take across to 2014 is “ranking / seeding”.
As a non-native speaker, I might not understand “strenght of schedule” correctly.And why mandatory, Bold? Give me one reason why it should carry over, other than that you just want it to.
As for the calendar year, I am all for it.
-
@alexgreat:
I don’t have a reason against playoff games also counting for 2014 league other than it feels weird because it is never done in any sport at any level that I am aware of.
There really is no connection that I can see. What is “our” purpose, then? The only thing that makes sense to take across to 2014 is “ranking / seeding”.
As a non-native speaker, I might not understand “strenght of schedule” correctly.And why mandatory, Bold? Give me one reason why it should carry over, other than that you just want it to.
As for the calendar year, I am all for it.
gamer, i can never get anything across to alex - can you please try to explain? sheesh, this guy is scared of his own shadow! :-P
-
I’m actually with Alex on this one. What major sport carries over tournaments and/or playoffs to the next year? I don’t see the point in including the tourney results for next year.
-
Well I’m guessing they’re thinking that if these games are being played (and they are between league players) they might as well count for the next year. Also, the playoff games are actually being played DURING the next season, unlike sports.
The Super Bowl is not played in September, when the teams could be playing their regular schedule. In A&A league, you are playing playoff games at the same time everyone else is playing regular season.Alex, Bold asked his question first and you gave no answer. Give a reason why they shouldn’t count. Then maybe Bold can answer why he wants them to count.
-
@seththenewb:
I’m actually with Alex on this one. What major sport carries over tournaments and/or playoffs to the next year? I don’t see the point in including the tourney results for next year.
sighhhhhhh…… no one else does it! what a great argument. how about considering the merits of such a proposal?
but before we do that, let’s go with your argument a bit. which major sport (not sure why we are qualifying it as major sports when we are playing a board game but whatever) has it’s playoffs going on at the same time as its regular season?
Merits: it allows for some of the top talent to get games in that will count toward the league minimums. a lot of the better players don’t play all that many games in a year. if they want to concentrate on their playoff games and maybe a tournament they are playing in, and that takes out a third or a half of their time to play league games, they may not even be able to qualify for minimum number of games. Second thing is it generates some games between top players. So, if you plan to get in the playoffs by preying on lower tiered players (alex???) then this may come as a blow. :wink:
just some of my thoughts - how about we don’t use the “hey no one else does it” defense and come up with something better? :-o





