@GeneralDisarray Game History
Round: 1 Bid Purchase - Germans Germans buy 1 artillery and 1 submarine; 0 PU unused Bid Placement - Germans 1 submarine placed in 120 Sea Zone 1 artillery placed in Holland Belgium Purchase Units - Germans Germans buy 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Trigger Germans 6 Atlantic Wall Broken Switch: Setting switch to false for conditionAttachment_Germans_6_Atlantic_Wall_Possible_Switch attached to Germans Combat Move - Germans 2 submarines moved from 120 Sea Zone to 109 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 106 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 111 Sea Zone to 113 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 121 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 127 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 battleship moved from 116 Sea Zone to 114 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Norway to 114 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from Holland Belgium to 113 Sea Zone 2 fighters moved from Western Germany to 113 Sea Zone 3 tactical_bombers moved from Western Germany to 113 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from Germany to 113 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Germany to 114 Sea Zone 1 tactical_bomber moved from Western Germany to Normandy Bordeaux 1 armour moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 1 artillery, 3 infantry and 2 mech_infantrys moved from Western Germany to France 3 armour and 3 mech_infantrys moved from Austria to France 2 artilleries and 6 infantry moved from Austria to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 1 infantry moved from Romania to Yugoslavia 1 armour and 2 infantry moved from Slovakia Hungary to Yugoslavia 1 armour moved from Poland to Yugoslavia 1 fighter moved from Poland to Yugoslavia 1 artillery moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 armour, 2 artilleries and 3 infantry moved from Holland Belgium to France Combat - Germans Battle in 109 Sea Zone Germans attack with 2 submarines British defend with 1 destroyer and 1 transport British win with 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -4 Casualties for Germans: 2 submarines Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Battle in 113 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 bomber, 3 fighters, 2 submarines and 3 tactical_bombers British defend with 1 battleship and 1 cruiser; French defend with 1 cruiser Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Germans win with 1 bomber, 3 fighters, 1 submarine and 3 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 34 Casualties for French: 1 cruiser Casualties for Germans: 1 submarine Casualties for British: 1 battleship and 1 cruiser Battle in 114 Sea Zone Germans attack with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Units damaged: 1 battleship owned by the British Germans win with 1 battleship, 1 bomber, 1 fighter, 2 submarines and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 37 Casualties for British: 1 battleship, 1 cruiser and 1 destroyer Battle in Yugoslavia Germans attack with 3 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 9 infantry Neutral_Allies defend with 5 infantry Germans win, taking Yugoslavia from Neutral_Allies with 3 armour, 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 8 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 12 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Casualties for Neutral_Allies: 5 infantry Battle in Normandy Bordeaux Germans attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber French defend with 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour and 1 infantry Germans win, taking Normandy Bordeaux from French with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 infantry and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for French: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Battle in France Germans attack with 5 armour, 3 artilleries, 6 infantry and 5 mech_infantrys British defend with 1 armour and 1 artillery; French defend with 1 aaGun, 1 airfield, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 factory_major, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Germans captures 19PUs while taking French capital Germans converts factory_major into different units Germans win, taking France from French with 5 armour, 2 artilleries and 5 mech_infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 31 Casualties for Germans: 1 artillery and 6 infantry Casualties for French: 1 aaGun, 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 fighter and 6 infantry Casualties for British: 1 armour and 1 artillery Trigger Germans Conquer France: Setting switch to true for conditionAttachment_French_1_Liberation_Switch attached to French triggerFrenchDestroyPUsGermans: Setting destroysPUs to true for playerAttachment attached to French Non Combat Move - Germans 1 bomber, 3 fighters and 3 tactical_bombers moved from 113 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 tactical_bomber moved from 114 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 114 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 1 bomber moved from 114 Sea Zone to Western Germany 1 tactical_bomber moved from Normandy Bordeaux to Western Germany 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to France 1 aaGun moved from Holland Belgium to Normandy Bordeaux 2 aaGuns, 3 artilleries and 11 infantry moved from Germany to Poland 1 infantry moved from Romania to Bulgaria Germans take Bulgaria from Neutral_Axis 1 fighter moved from Yugoslavia to Southern Italy 1 infantry moved from Norway to Finland Germans take Finland from Neutral_Axis 1 cruiser and 1 transport moved from 117 Sea Zone to 115 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from Norway to Finland 1 aaGun moved from Western Germany to 115 Sea Zone 1 infantry moved from Denmark to 115 Sea Zone 1 aaGun and 1 infantry moved from 115 Sea Zone to Norway 1 infantry moved from Denmark to Western Germany Place Units - Germans 1 carrier, 1 destroyer and 1 transport placed in 115 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Germans Germans collect 41 PUs; end with 60 PUs Trigger Germans 5 Swedish Iron Ore: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 65 PUs Objective Germans 1 Trade with Russia: Germans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 70 PUs2013 - AAG 40 League
-
I second that nomination. :)
I really think it should be a rule – whenever something like that happens, nip it in the bud. That being said, are we allowed to declare that only attacker rolls count in our pregame post and have it stand so that situations like the above can be avoided? If so, that solves the problem.
-
Absolutely, it would be a good idea to type up a standard pre-game post and copy/paste it each time you play a game. Is a good idea to communicate your expectations on certain things up front. I’ll have to work on that myself, soon
Biggest one for me, is the policy on doing things out of turn, especially with the USA/China/UK move. But there are other things, too. Best to just type up a standard policy to prevent disagreements in game…
-
I nominate gamerman to adjudicate the g40 league.
I second that nomination. :)
I’m willing to go on record to oppose such a nomination. While I greatly respect and appreciate Gamerman’s efforts behind keeping an up-to-date unofficial rankings list, I don’t think his interactions with other forum members have been amicable enough to warrant elevation to a position of authority. This will probably come across as personal, but it isn’t, you only need to read through the flame war in the
Pointlessly BrokenPacific `40 thread to see one example of what I’m talking about.This discussion does bring up the fact that these boards are basically un-moderated and have been for some time, Jen is merely the last to disappear. I don’t think I’ve seen any posts from the others at all in 2013; only JWW seems to be left. I’ve tried to PM Jensen in the past to get somebody to step into threads that have been getting way out of hand, but haven’t had any response from him either.
-
Egg, they weren’t serious, jeez. That’s not how moderators are picked.
No, I am not nice enough to be a moderator. I do not always respond well to dicks
-
You omitted my work as rules deputy! :-o :roll: :x
-
@Eggman:
I nominate gamerman to adjudicate the g40 league.
I second that nomination. :)
I’m willing to go on record to oppose such a nomination. While I greatly respect and appreciate Gamerman’s efforts behind keeping an up-to-date unofficial rankings list, I don’t think his interactions with other forum members have been amicable enough to warrant elevation to a position of authority. This will probably come across as personal, but it isn’t, you only need to read through the flame war in the
Pointlessly BrokenPacific `40 thread to see one example of what I’m talking about.This discussion does bring up the fact that these boards are basically un-moderated and have been for some time, Jen is merely the last to disappear. I don’t think I’ve seen any posts from the others at all in 2013; only JWW seems to be left. I’ve tried to PM Jensen in the past to get somebody to step into threads that have been getting way out of hand, but haven’t had any response from him either.
egg, what’s up bro? gamer never goes off on someone who doesn’t fully deserve it. :-P
i think gamer has more experience and more of an ability to be impartial and fair (and online regularly) than anyone else i am aware of on this site. i never suggested the “moderator” title, i suggested that he be the person asked to settle minor disputes - small claims court if you will. Jenn can still be the supreme commander. :-P
-
Egg, they weren’t serious, jeez. That’s not how moderators are picked.
egg, what’s up bro? gamer never goes off on someone who doesn’t fully deserve it. :-P
i think gamer has more experience and more of an ability to be impartial and fair (and online regularly) than anyone else i am aware of on this site. i never suggested the “moderator” title, i suggested that he be the person asked to settle minor disputes - small claims court if you will. Jenn can still be the supreme commander. :-P
Yes, I wasn’t thinking that this was anything official. It sounded to me like people wanted to vote for themselves on an unofficial position.
The fact that the existing moderators are all AWOL is a somewhat different issue. And as an aside, civility usually involves treating people better than you think they deserve. Of course, you could also be saying to yourself
that guy really deserved to be slapped around, but I settled for being rude. It’s all relative. -
If we’re supposed to place bid units only in territories that already have a unit of the same power in it, then how come I hear that some people put an ANZAC infantry in New Guinea? Is it legal to do that?
after going over Jens rules, it looks like that is a legal move.
-
Who’s voting for themselves?
-
Who’s voting for themselves?
Nobody. I was trying to say that the members of the community were taking it upon themselves to have a vote.
-
hey, i got jobbed!!! a couple of guys wouldnt let me put an inf in new guinea.
-
hey, i got jobbed!!! a couple of guys wouldnt let me put an inf in new guinea.
Protest the games :wink:
-
nah, it aint like im going to win the league or anything……im just trying to learn this year and make a run next year…besides whom would i protest too?
-
Your opponents
Did you see the wink?
-
i get it now.
-
cow (allies) defeats last jack (axis)
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=30270.120
-
Wrong thread, Cow.
-
yeah cow, wrong thread
-
I’m sure you all have noticed that the default name that TripleA gives the turns for the U.S. and ANZAC are the same (“A5” for example). Is there any way that ANZAC’s default file name for the MB’s could be changed to, say, Z (“Z5” as an example)?
-
Send a PM to Veqryn





