I assume you meant to put âownedâ instead of âpwnedâ when talking about a Barbarossa/Stalingrad game in reference to Battle of the Bulge or Guadalcanal. I agree here too. At least for me, a game such as that would probably have owned the others.
Nah, I meant âpwnâ. I was using netspeak: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pwned
I think some kind of A&A Russian-front game would be the brilliant, but I donât hold out much hope of seeing one.
I wonât continue, since Iâve made my feelings clear and this is just one of those âwe donât agreeâ type issues. I also donât want to sound like I wouldnât be able to enjoy / play the game because of it, which obviously isnât true.
However, I will still say thisâŚ
No, theyâd probably, like me, not give a damn.
I think some of them, like some people here, clearly would give a damn. For that reason alone designers should take certain things into account. I donât hold WotC in particularly high esteem, since they have a habit of short-changing the consumer on many small aspects of games which in reality would take almost no effort or cost to put right. Larry only has input which goes so far, and he has my respect. But Wizards do too many irritating things, and to me, this is just another one of them.