Global 2nd edition Q+A ( AAG40.2)

@gamergray:

But, a lone transport cannot make an amphibious assault against a Sub.  A surface ship is needed to drive it off.

Right, but we’re talking about bombarding ships escorting the transport here, so this is not an issue.

So,
If the BB and the CA do not drive off the SS, how is the AP able to get past the SS?

AP is a transport?  What do you mean by “drive off”? 
With an escort, the sub can still be ignored. 
If there is a scramble, then the sub is in the battle and the cruiser and battleship or whatever would have to win the battle for the transport to unload and conduct amphibious assault.

If the BB and/or the CA engage the SS, then no bombardment.

That’s right

This seems inconsistent.  But if that is the way the rule works, OK

I’m not sure what you’re asking.  Let me know what you think about my explanation above - I think it might have answered your question.  If not, ask follow up question please

What prevents the SS from engaging the AP(transport)?

The sub stops the transport if is is alone. 
If the BB or CA don’t engage the SS why does the SS not stop the transport?

@gamergray:

What prevents the SS from engaging the AP(transport)?

The sub stops the transport if is is alone. 
If the BB or CA don’t engage the SS why does the SS not stop the transport?

Now I understand your question.

Subs can be ignored.
An exception to the rule is unescorted transports (sub prevents that combat movement from being made)
However, in this case the transport IS escorted, therefore the exception does not apply and you are back to subs can be ignored.

However, if there is a scramble, then there is combat in the seazone and the sub joins in the combat and cannot be ignored (after all, it is not alone - it has defending aircraft with it).

In other words, a warship can always ignore subs unless there is a scramble of aircraft, regardless of whether transports are with it/them or not.

If Russian troops attack an empty Korea during turn 2… does that negate the Mongolian rule?

@Young:

If Russian troops attack an empty Korea during turn 2… does that negate the Mongolian rule?

Doesn’t matter if it’s empty, if Russia attacks Korea before Japan attacks Russia, the Mongolians will never join the Russians

Similar to the NO where Japan can’t attack FIC.  Empty or not

@Gamerman01:

@Young:

If Russian troops attack an empty Korea during turn 2… does that negate the Mongolian rule?

Doesn’t matter if it’s empty, if Russia attacks Korea before Japan attacks Russia, the Mongolians will never join the Russians

Similar to the NO where Japan can’t attack FIC.  Empty or not

Thanks, not sure what happened to the sticky thread that explained the Mongolian rule in detail, it was helpful.

It was about 5 pages down (last post in August)
I bumped it for you
G40 boards

@Gamerman01:

It was about 5 pages down (last post in August)
I bumped it for you
G40 boards

Thanks.

Can a sub be ignored during an amphibious assault and still get shore bombardment from the same territory? if so, what would be the circustances required?

@Young:

Can a sub be ignored during an amphibious assault and still get shore bombardment from the same territory? if so, what would be the circustances required?

Yes. No special circumstances.

But you can’t ignore a sub with an unescorted (no warship) landing. Not 100% sure if a sub escort counts.

Simon, sub escort does count

YG, yes you can ignore subs and bombard.

@Gamerman01:

Simon, sub escort does count

YG, yes you can ignore subs and bombard.

Ok, same with lone transports right, ignore them and get your bombardments?

Yes, that’s definitely true

My BB is damaged.

It is at an undamaged Naval Yard at the end of my turn.

Before my next turn the Naval Yard is damaged.

I pay to remove all counters from my Naval Yard.

Does the BB get repaired the same turn I pay to repair my damaged Naval Yard?

I reckon yes.

Repairs take effect immediately,
and the controlling player can use repaired facilities during the rest
of this turn.

Simon told you right

Where is the books does it explain the American minor ICs getting upgraded to Major ICs once at war?

Europe book, page 39, additional rules

@Gamerman01:

Europe book, page 39, additional rules

Thanks Gamerman, and happy new year.

Here’s my question.
UK strafes neutral iraq from persia and transjord and retreats to transjord. 1 unactivated inf remains in iraq.Now its Italys turn and he has 1 tank 1 inf in syria.He wants to attack transjord with syria forces and amphibious troops from elsewhere.Can he activate iraq by moving his syria tank through iraq?
  If so,can the iraq inf join this attack on tranjord?
If not, could the iraq inf be activated by Italian troops retreating back into iraq?I’m sure the amphibious troops can’t retreat.