@Yavid:
Ive been thinking about using clown nose red japanese as communist china. I never liked one country having two different color units (old pacific marines come to mind). To me color of the unit is the Number 1 way of telling nations apart. What the piece is shaped like should tell you what type of unit it is. And never between the two shall meet. I use HBG inf. with the flamethrower in OOB American Green as my marines.
If shape is important to you as a delineator, I can’t understand why you’d use Japanese infantry as Chinese infantry.
As for me, I don’t mind having 2 colors for the “major powers,” 1 for standard troops and 1 for elites. Thus, I rather like using the black Germans as elites and the HBG “early war” Germans and the classic MB/ EotC piece set in dark grey as standards, as well as having 2 shades of green for the US, tan for the UK, and red/ brown for USSR, etc. I still haven’t decided whether I’m going to keep using red for Japanese elites or switch to yellow when HBG makes that an option. (In my recent tournament, one student expressed that it was confusing to him that both the Russians and the Japanese were using red elite infantry.) …In any case I’m quite happy that HBG’s planning on giving us those options.
For me, these pieces are so small that depending entirely on shape to distinguish pieces that are at all similar-shaped is not ideal. This isn’t a problem when distinguishing a tank from an infantryman or fighter, of course… but certainly can be when distinguishing 2 infantryman or 2 tanks or 2 fighters from each other. For the minors, this isn’t much of an issue, but for the majors, this becomes an issue the moment you have any sort of elite or special unit. (Perhaps this is especially true for me, since I often play with beginners.)