Russia opening move?

@Mallery29:

Who cares about Africa now when you already have an IC in India?

I don’t for very long, we tried this like several times, I even built the F-ing 3 Battleships on India and still Japan won because of the extra FTRs, Battleship. I could hold India another round but that’s it. So basically, E-Indies has to go,or Egypt should be safe so that German can be GONE from Meditteranian pretty fast. This is important. Egypt - India has to be clear and held, these are two areas where UK can make a brutal stand, and stop the Axis until the U.S. comes through.

Once again, Russian stack of 10-11 INF, 3 Art, 4 Tank still dies if Germany wants it to die, and I am pretty sure they want that to happen.
Furthermore, if we concentrate it all on W-Russia, there is no need for 1 Russian FTR anyway. It’s not need for it when Ukraine is attacked either.

If all concentrated on W-Russia, Germany can still strike with 6 INF, 1 Art, 4 Tank, 6 FTR, 1 Bomber.

According to calc which you showed me, Germany WINS BY 81% actually, I though it was 66%. So it’s even worse than I though. Check it by your self.

Stacking all on W-Russia, means Russia is DEAD when G1 start. No Russia anymore.

Let’s say Russia only loses 1 INF before they take W-Russia. Germany still wins by almost 69% ! But 81% is most probably. Not very fun for Russia is it ?

Clearly Ukraine can’t be ignored, it has to go, and W-Russia should be taken barely, and Russian FTR to Egypt so that UK can get the job done, which is to either slaughter E-Indies by 63% chance of doing so or going Med-strategy which seems also good, will test it later in the weekend, by building IC on Egypt + consdering doing so for the U.S. on Alaska also.

UK needs to pump tanks, tanks, tanks, right away and the only way to do that is by having Egypt safe so that UK can choose - E-Indies or Med strategy. If Egypt dies on G1, then none of the options are available anymore.

@Mallery29:

1. Didn’t I say the BB move would fail for India?

2. You have to hit Ukraine for the WRUS stack to not be sacked by G1…so recalc that and see how that goes.

3. The FTR IS needed for Ukraine…you have to make Germany pay

4.  India will not fall if Egypt falls. Germany will send one tank to sweep around Africa in worst case scenario.

5.  Agreed that E.Indies fleet must die.

.  Yeah, i ran the calc, your stack on wrus – 6 Inf , 2 tank, 2 art. Germans win 94% chance by attacking it with 3 Inf, 2 tank, 1 bomber and 5 ftr. So basically your suggestion to stack is Even worse.  And i dont want to have ant German tanks running around in africa, and third, Kind of hard to take out the e-indies fleet with no extra ftr from Egypt, Thats the whole Point why russian ftr has to land on Egypt. Russia need to take ukraine as i said and wrus barely, because any stacking by russia Means russia is dead

@AxisBrutality:

As I said, I am gladly open to suggestions. However, as mentioned no Russian FTR can land on W-Russia.So what do you suggest, just taking W-Russia and concentrate it all on W-Russia, correct ? But that still gives Germany 66% to kill the WHOLE stack, Germany has the money to go for it, and yes, I know Russia will be toast then, that’s why I want to take W-Russia barely, and save 1 INF, 1 Art, 1 Tank so that I have something besides 2 FTR to conterattack with, besides those 8 INF I buy + 2 moving from Evenki to Ark and 1 INF from Novo to Moscow.

LOL Well, it sure is a novel idea to me to simply trade WRus with Germany but I wouldn’t try it. :)

The issue here is the different perceptions of moving the Soviet fighter to Egypt - to me it is a possible choice to add to the Soviet options but it has a clear impact on other Soviet attacks and until 3 days ago I was winning with the Allies without having to make this move.

It’s not fun for the UK nor the U.S. watching Egypt die, and then Japan gets crazy and kills everything in East-Asia, 4 territories, then it’s not even the point to hold India, just give up and buy 3 FTR on London. And by J3, whole Asia and Middle East is dead, now Russia have to pour serious INF forces already on R3 to the East, they can’t afford that.

To me that’s normal, to see Japan overrunning Asia. It’s like my signature says: ‘I don’t care about Moscow as long as I’m holding Berlin’ :)

USSR needs to take Ukraine and West Russia R1.

The FTR will be necessary for R1 and R2 fighting. If it is sent to Egypt it cannot fight R1, and it’s very unlikely that it would be able to fight productively R2. It cannot be spared for Egypt.

At least that’s my take from my analysis, calculations, and experience so far.

@Mallery29:

And is Germany really going to hit WRUS? No because the US/UK will have a fleet for Germany on turn 3, and nothing to defend itself with (considering it would lose its Air Force).

Aggressive German players can and will hit West Russia. Even if Caucasus/Moscow doesn’t fall to the Germans this attack is enough to punch the Russians out for the Japanese knock-out and Germany merely needs to slow down the UK/US, who will have to choose between building fleet/units for Europe or keeping India out of the Japanese grasp.

@Mallery29:

I don’t think that will go as well as you think with the Indian IC coming into play now….42.1, yeah, I would definietly agree to go all in against Russia…but the reinforcements for Japan are going to be a long way off with E. Indies out and India threatening to advance/US Pacific involvement.

If the Allies go KJF after a successful G1 attack then Germany should be able to conquer Caucasus and then Russia. It’s impossible for the Russians match up Germany’s production.

Perhaps it is more clear this way: if West Russia is lost on G1, then the Soviets lose a total of 2 AAG, 12 INF, 3 ART and 4 ARM on round 1, or 3/4s of the value of their starting ground units, leaving them only 9 INF, 5 of which will be in Yakut. The Germans will lose a total of 12 INF, 2 ART and 4 ARM, plus planes on the R1 attacks and on going after WR but that still leaves them with an additional 13+ INF and 5+ ARM to deploy against Russia on G1/G2 on combat and non-combat moves, like retaking and stacking Ukraine.

Germany spends about half its ground force and most of its airforce and in return the Soviets lose 3/4s of their ground force and their income and they are earning -6 IPC than Germany due to losing access to Karelia, Belorussia and Ukraine. Germany’s income goes to 42 IPCs or more, while Soviet income is capped to 24 IPC.

After that, either Japan or Germany can go and get Moscow while the other stalls the UK/US.

@Mallery29:

If you G1 WRussia, I assume you would probably send your SS after the US DD and the 2SS/CA after the UK BB/SS, UK CA defeated by German BB (I possibly assume but could easily be wrong that you would go 7inf/2art/SS/tank?…

You need 3 subs to SZ7… imagining that I’d use all the planes on WR (which may not be required if some Soviets attacks go back on R1) then the deciding factor is what to do with the SZ15 fleet - either send it to land on Ukraine/Caucasus or to hit the cruiser and take Gibraltar, with 1 sub assisting.

My buy would also either be 12 INF, 1 ART or 4 INF, 1 ART, 4 ARM, depending on my mid/long term plans.

so
UK1: 2inf/art, save the rest. Finish of German CA, send Bomber and DD after BB, sink German SS off EUS w/DD
US1: 4DD, FTR.
G2: Redeploy airforce/SS to protect coast, position SS for eminent invasion
UK2: inf/art/tank, save the rest
US2: 2trans/2DD, NCM to Canada (spend on Pac w/rest)
G3: Close in on WRUS/Caucus. Russia continues buildup, position SS for invasion
UK3: Drop 2CVs, 1trans, 1CA, 3inf India (might have about 10 left for flex spending for troops)
US3: Reinforce UK fleet with the 4DD/FTRs. (continue to split money 50/50)

US should be building the shuck, and UK can counter w/troops now too…I’m sure France or Holland is defended, but you can’t defend both, especially since you are focused on the Bear…Russia just needs to hold long enough to wittle down France/Holland defense to plant marker…Don’t know what your German buys would be but will have to read after poker…Caucus may be getting pinched, but India should be able to grow legs here soon

After killing WR on G1, the optimal Axis strategy requires Germany is to move on G2/3 a stack to West Russia that the Soviets can’t destroy, with assistance from Japanese fighters, if necessary. Then the Soviets are forced to permanently lose Caucasus to the Axis or lose Russia.
Now, add to it also a Japanese push of about 10 ground units that reach Kazakh by J3 and the whole Soviet defense can shatter like broken glass.

@Mallery29:

AxisBrutality…you aren’t using the calculator correctly…did you forget the two AA guns? � Try that math please before you spew more frivolous stuff out here…it’s 54% in Russia’s favor…
Second, don’t send the art to Ukraine…I would use it in West Russia…yeah, you sack two tanks, but you can still take Ukraine. � But people could go the other way and keep the tank in WRUS and send the art to die in Ukraine…it really doesn’t matter, as long as you hit WRUS and Ukraine. � And is Germany really going to hit WRUS? No because the US/UK will have a fleet for Germany on turn 3, and nothing to defend itself with (considering it would lose its Air Force).

It’s obvious to me you haven’t read ANYTHING said in these threads over the last few days.

Ok, this is getting nowhere, i am not in the mood to sit here and fight and argue. I dont know sh1t according to You, fine, i am out of here. I can’t discuss with those who think They can take out e-indies with 1 fighter only, nor can i accept 1 or more German tanks running around in Afrika. Egypt and India area hold the the key to half uk income. Yes, i did forget 2 AAA, which still does not change anything i said . Ukraine Needs to go, the only differce is that stack is Now safe with 2 AAA . But that didn’t change the fact that Ukraine has to go and i can take it with 3 inf , 1 art, 3 tank and 1 fighter. 85% chance win for russia. Then You can run the calc to see how far You can Get with only 1 fighter against e-indies. Have fun, i am out of here, completely impossible to discuss, some here are more obsessed with arguing for fun instead of adjusting and being open minded like i was, sending that it is necessary to take 1 fighter from germany and save Egypt as it is also important to destroy east indies. Anyway, good Luck on taking out east indies with 1 fighter and having germans drive around whole africa.

@AxisBrutality:

Ok, this is getting nowhere, i am not in the mood to sit here and fight and argue. I dont know sh1t according to You, fine, i am out of here.

Darn it! I was really enjoying the debate!

@Mallery29:

Odds change when you can sack two AAs…they change enough to make it difficult for the Germans to go after WRUS…you tried saying it was guaranteed kill…I begged to differ.  Hobbes says a aggressive German player would go after it…I think he is right to a point, but I don’t think it’s as advantageous as it was in 42.1.  The AA guns could sink the Axis in Rd1.  Loss of half the Air Force on Rd 1 would almost be like not taking France in Global./quote]

AAs on 42.2 make the West Russia attack actually easier. If you bring 7 planes the AAs will only shoot at 6. To protect WRus both AAs will have to be there, meaning that if Ukraine wasn’t attacked then either Caucasus will be without AA, or the AAs will be split between both territories and will only shoot at 3 planes on each attack.

@Mallery29:

The point was to have WRus and Ukraine attacked R1 and load up in WRus (not a only WRus all-in, that’s a bad idea on Russia’s part IMHO)…not a fan of the barely hitting WRus…the stack in WRus with Ukraine hit gives 6 total planes to attack with WRus, but if those 2AA hit a number of planes with some luck of the dice, the game could be over without it getting past Rd1…that’s all I’m saying.

I think this is where the confusion is at…Germany to attack the WRus stack without having the Ukraine units would not be a smart move by Germany…could do it to weaken the Russian stack, but at what cost/risk to its own stack and by allowing the allies to toy around in the Atlantic. � Definitely a HIGH RISK/HIGH REWARD type scenario, but this could easily blow up in the Axis face right away…

I think the general consensus is to attack Ukraine, so the point of view has to be taken with Ukraine out of commision. � Do you attack WRus now as Germany on G1? � I think even just doing 1 round of attacks and then retreating is not worth it…not going to risk it with a 55% chance of losing (you’d probably only eliminate the Russian inf while losing the inf/tanks on the attack with a distinct possibilty of losing FTRs).

If this was JUST an all out WRus attack (by Russia), I would proably hit WRus G1 too (ignoring Caucus) and deal with the Atlantic on G2.

Germany waits until the end of the Soviet round to decide. What territories did the Russians attack and what were the losses. Then it decides if it wants to attack West Russia or not, based on those factors. That’s why I have those tables already from 1st Ed., I can easily check the odds, based on territories attacked and Soviet casualties, and decide if it is worthwhile or not.
The WR + UKR Soviet opening is the best to prevent a G1 WR attack but the dice ultimately decide - if the Russians have more than 3 losses on WR or can’t clear UKR of German units then it can be worthwhile for the Germans to go after WR.

Ukraine attack is no good.

You lose them for nothing when you could have taken Finland and probably protected those army’s from demise on g1. Finland attack kills the same number of Germans.

Of course the German player can invade Finland devoting naval units, but the idea is to do anything to tempt the German player to not killing UK naval on G1.