For the most part I don’t blame dice, and for the record in this game, I won’t.
There is a specific angle to my strategy that you’re not seeing (Wow do I have to spell it out for you?). That’s all that’s going on.
I find ironic and insulting Veq, that you would say that I’m not trying to “beat you with my own head”. Instead of using -standard- openers, developed by EVERYONE. I create my own unique opening to try some different approaches, and I get accussed BEFORE ANY DICE ARE ROLLED, that I’m trying to create a situation which I can blame loss on chance alone.
That’s pathetic. and I demand you retract your comments! :P
Luck is a portion of my game that I always count on, Look at any of my tournament games. Some people don’t understand her, but she makes sense to me, and she’s always along for the ride - good or bad.
We like to fight battles that others would call insane, and more often then not we prevail.
I also fundamentally look at units entirely differently in terms of value than most people do. Like the knight and bishop in chess, which is more valueable?
An American Battleship is not worth the same as a Japanese one, or a british one, or an italian one. The value of a unit is not it’s IPC cost. It’s the units capabilities, postion, turn order, available support coordination, and possibilities.