XDAP - 02 Final Draft (Axis) vs Dairy Qryn (Allies)

Ugh, yea that NO is tricky.  The Game Notes are off on a few things I’ve noticed.  It’s off on the Kamikazees and some other things too.

It does seem from the game notes that the NO will be taken away for those British planes. Yea, there is no reason for the German player to move that sub knowing that the NO was in effect, should he move it.  It can still reach z110 from there.  You should let Garg edit that in and blame it on the game notes confusion. It’s the sporting thing to do.

@DutchmanD:

Ugh, yea that NO is tricky.  The Game Notes are off on a few things I’ve noticed.  It’s off on the Kamikazees and some other things too.

It does seem from the game notes that the NO will be taken away for those British planes. Yea, there is no reason for the German player to move that sub knowing that the NO was in effect, should he move it.  It can still reach z110 from there.  You should let Garg edit that in and blame it on the game notes confusion. It’s the sporting thing to do.

I agree.  By the way DD, do we have a second round opponent yet?

No.  They are in the 3rd round.  :cry:

wtf, right?

@DutchmanD:

Ugh, yea that NO is tricky.  The Game Notes are off on a few things I’ve noticed.  It’s off on the Kamikazees and some other things too.

It does seem from the game notes that the NO will be taken away for those British planes. Yea, there is no reason for the German player to move that sub knowing that the NO was in effect, should he move it.  It can still reach z110 from there.  You should let Garg edit that in and blame it on the game notes confusion. It’s the sporting thing to do.

If they are off, why not alert me and/or write out what it should say.

Nothing gets fixed until someone who knows it is wrong fixes it.

@Veqryn:

@DutchmanD:

Ugh, yea that NO is tricky.  The Game Notes are off on a few things I’ve noticed.  It’s off on the Kamikazees and some other things too.

It does seem from the game notes that the NO will be taken away for those British planes. Yea, there is no reason for the German player to move that sub knowing that the NO was in effect, should he move it.  It can still reach z110 from there.  You should let Garg edit that in and blame it on the game notes confusion. It’s the sporting thing to do.

If they are off, why not alert me and/or write out what it should say.

Nothing gets fixed until someone who knows it is wrong fixes it.

My apologies.  You are right.  :oops:  Do you want details on the Kamikazee stuff?

@DutchmanD:

@Veqryn:

@DutchmanD:

Ugh, yea that NO is tricky.�  The Game Notes are off on a few things I’ve noticed.�  It’s off on the Kamikazees and some other things too.

It does seem from the game notes that the NO will be taken away for those British planes. Yea, there is no reason for the German player to move that sub knowing that the NO was in effect, should he move it.�  It can still reach z110 from there.�  You should let Garg edit that in and blame it on the game notes confusion. It’s the sporting thing to do.

If they are off, why not alert me and/or write out what it should say.

Nothing gets fixed until someone who knows it is wrong fixes it.

My apologies.  You are right.   :oops:  Do you want details on the Kamikazee stuff?

i like to copy and paste, so rewriting it would be best
or you could just tell me what is wrong with what the game notes currently has

Ok. I’ll pm ya.

@Gargantua:

Wow “The People’s Law” just got told… ;)

Hey, it’s important to be able to take an ass-chewing like a man.  Trust me, getting your ass chewed by a judge every month or so keeps you pretty humble.  Tactful acquiesense is as beautiful a skill as is take-no-prisoners aggresive arguing.  But, shucks, when a man is right, he’s right.  Here I am noticing stuff jacked up on the game notes and not letting Veq know, and then I post about it in a game that he’ actually playing in.  I mean, c’mon, that’s not cool yo.

That’s a bad lawyer…bad lawyer! -sprays DD with the water bottle- haha

I always thought it was originally controlled russian spots… hmm. guess an edit would be fine. I don’t think russian bomber could have hit it anyway…

it’s just be a sub there anyway.

also a dd or sub there would have nothing to with me in sz 125. it is just russia’s decision.

I guess we could get an airbase for romania, snipe a dd with air, move in with all my naval, lose tactical/fighter replace with uk air from romania. then get a 50/50 crack at holding london.

but you would probably use a sub anyway. the hell.

I never read the game notes… nor have I contributed to it…

garg you can stop the +5 NO if you make new game notes for people.

It is not a big deal, I don’t edit unless it is bug related… like units that refuse to move to a legal spot. People usually allow non combat edits in the placement phase to just speed up game play otherwise people just end up double checking everything… not sure if that is something allowed in pbf games. I haven’t used edit function yet other than to recreate an exact copy of the game for the new version. Japan hasn’t used an edit yet. Just garg and veqryn so far, garg moved 2 bombers in placement then veq two ground units moved. So yeah first out of turn edit after someone went.
Don’t worry garg, I forgot to move my morocco guys twice lol.