XPAD-01 Dairy Qyrn (AXIS) vs Team MountainHIGH

ok go veqryn! do whatever it is you do. tough call with hawaii… 1/5 games instant win, but up to you.

I am not, this just turned into an income game all over again. I am so used to rushing and having games over before round 10, one side either wins or loses clearly.

I prefer full pacific usa solve pacific first, don’t really need russia with uk pacific and 3 factories in the middle east. uk just spams infantry to hold it. usa matches germany income to hold london. It is a race.

or with axis I do two races, usually I go for russia, but uk was in the 80% range so I couldn’t pass that up.  Japan saw the opportunity to play conservatively and he did so up until now.

His last turn was really confusing because he only has 20% for hawaii in the event carolines got dropped. So I am really bummed out here.

Even though we are still up in tuv unit count and income etc or soon to be up again… the fact that there is no capital battles or final vc showdown for the next 5 turns again, is demoralizing.

I have to start dropping 1 dd with italy and scrambling 3 fighters or something soon, work italy back in the game, get more germans in the fight, while kicking america out… I would go all out russia, but I believe my odds are really bad on the attack. I could have taken 30% or something (if I bought all bombers then swung in the next turn), but japan was looking like pacific win so I passed that opportunity, which is my regret for this game. In a live game, I would have swung. At the time I wanted to encourage japan to go all in on something, which is what japan usually does and it usually works.

~
next game garg, going to show you the small’s big world strategy if I am axis again as long as I can encourage veqryn to go along with it. You will enjoy that madness even more.

soulfein knows what I am talking about.

It is our secret weapon and it is most baller.

yes I have the wild strategies reserved for the loser bracket.

no keep it, it is funny.

there is no point to it, unless you can take it.

Why not take his national objective away in aleutan islands?

also get some inf for india.

you don’t need transports if he is not stealing islands from you and you also have to be willing to swing back at it.

also what is up with the destroyers? global is all about carrier fighter mixes.

destroyers are better for attacking strait naval, but don’t put much pressure on taking an island and are not as good on defense.  it is a good buy if you plan to attack strait naval.

right now you just need enough to sink america/anzac the rest should go to expanding if you are playing income.

the aleutan island no is 6 ipc you take away from usa, 1 less sub is 1 less sub.

I did not calc a hawaii attack, but i assume 2 more units is not going to help

but yeah keep putting units out into asia, don’t dump uk pacific survivors onto your europe counterpart, that is japan’s problem coming at me, you got to make up for it by pushing forward and trading units.

If you play the income game, do aggressive expansion, that way you don’t dump usa on me.

another strategy if hawaii turns into a fortress and you don’t have the carrier/air/boats to take it is move up to hollywood and stop him from producing naval off of it. I think you lost the naval superioirity to do that at this point.

I do understand that you need enough to sink usa to maintain a mexican standoff that is favorable for you. (he has to block you instead of you block him).

ask yourself what is the point if you can’t take it? there is no point. take aleutan islands.