Scotland

@FranceNeedsMorePower

Thanks for clarifying.

It doesn’t matter, but I’ll note that in TripleA, if a power (in this case, Japan) attacks a territory controlled by an enemy (China), that contains units belonging to a netural power (in this case, the Soviet Union), TripleA straight up ignores those units and leaves Soviet units in the newly Japanese territory.

@Faramir

I haven’t tried the Korea move yet. To me though, fewer units earlier seems better than more units later.

Once again, I’ll test it out. China may be harder with a bid which would require more units than usual.

@LewisClark

To keep the discussion alive, i´ve been making some strategy videos.

Here´s one for the UK:

https://youtu.be/Z4vqnXhq4pU?si=YvdnR9tssBjlS1kE

I argued should I for Scotland too which I said no as you have to worry about that being Sea Lion invasion and you can just beat it up from London.

@shadowhawk

To keep the discussion alive, i´ve been making some strategy videos.

Here´s one for the UK:

https://youtu.be/Z4vqnXhq4pU?si=YvdnR9tssBjlS1kE

@GeneralHandGrenade

To keep the discussion alive, i´ve been making some strategy videos.

Here´s one for the UK:

https://youtu.be/Z4vqnXhq4pU?si=YvdnR9tssBjlS1kE

The 2 TP purchase is crucial to ensuring that the British cannot forgo turn 1 defenses for a G2 Sealion. It also allows for a G2 Barbossa purchase with the TP’s hitting up the Russian coast should you be in such a position, or better positioning for a G3 assault on Russia.

THREE successful invasions of the UK in one game?  That’s insane.  The US must have been asleep at the switch.  Probably the same thing with the British player.

Kudos to the German player for having the biggest naval balls in history.  Britain is a very expensive proposition.