I know. And you placed the fleet well.
Had I not made the breakthrough, I would have attacked SZ 8 with my ships and 6 fighters, taken Aleutian Islands, fortified Siberia with more infantry via transports, built an airbase in Siberia and landed air there, blocked SZ 4 with one ship and built one or two carriers for 2-4 more air to land in an adjacent sea zone wherever the sea battle would have been (in case you would not have attacked me), SZ 2, 1, 3, 8 or 4. Sure you would have built an airbase and scrambler in case of staying defensive.
Point is, all my air would have been able to land on Aleutians in an attack. In case you attacked you had lesser combat values, in case I would have attacked I had the subs and more air in range by then.
All in all I think I would have won this particular battle. But it would have been bloodier I guess. And above all this, I consider you the winner of this game from the moment you allowed my TTs to live in G3.
Pls forgive me for not typing the Non combats, I attach the map, I dont think I made a mistake. Pls feel free to check!! Its past 2 am again…
Re tech I am ambivalent. I too think it can distort the game, but usually in favour of allies as I as axis seem not be able to invest as much (mainly this exp comes from earlier versions of AA). But on the other hand it adds flavour and everyone is free to use it, if both agree. may playgroup likes national advantages as well, talk about skewing…
MOBILIZATION:
2 Fig Japan
MIC … oh dear, I just realize I cant do that as Philippines is an island, right? --> Need to think about this tomorrow, but would be fair to build somewhere now that I bought it and know the combat results of this turn).
3 Mech FIC
2 Mech India
3 Inf Manchuria
1 Inf Japan
INCOME
60 (terr) + 10 (NO) = 70