@SuperbattleshipYamato disregard my last, here is the right one
Noll (Allies) vs. Corriganbp (Axis) - A3 as of Nov 2011 - Anti Sea Lion Test
-
China retreats.
fig in KAN, mobilize 5inf KAN;
Collects 6+1 = 7 IPCs
-
UK#2
UKL = 27
4inf (12)
2rtl (8)
repair 7UKP = 23
7inf (21), save 2
uk dows Japan
Combat Moves:
1inf alx > tob
1inf shn > siam
ncms on map (I adjusted some USA ncms too);
-
-
Italy 2
With 15 ipcs,
2 subs = 12
1 inf =3Combat
Inf fr Iso to Kenya
Attack Alg ( 1 inf) with
Mech tank art fr TunisAttack
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 32@2: (1, 1)1@3: (1)
DefendRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
Attack Tobruk (1 inf) with
3 inf 1 art fr LibyaAttack
Rolls: 2@1 2@2; Total Hits: 12@1: (4, 3)2@2: (3, 2)
DefendRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
-
Italy 2
With 15 ipcs,
2 subs = 12
1 inf =3Combat
Inf fr Iso to Kenya
Alg taken without loss
Tobruk taken with loss of 1 inf
Italy collects 14 ipcs
-
Anzac (11 ipcs)
builds 2rtl 1inf
DOWs Japan;
NCMs on map,
France NCMs too.
(I added 1 transport in sz101 that I forgot to add during US/UK turn)
Anzac collects 12+5 = 17
PS: I’m not so sure about this game, even though it’s an unusual game due to the unlucky Taranto raid; but I want to continue anyway and I will ask you to play again after this :P
-
Germany 3
With 56 ipcs,
1 dd = 8
8 subs = 48Amphib assault London (4 aa, 14 inf, 2 art, 3 ftrs) with
12 inf fr Gib, Norway, W Germany
8 tanks fr Gib, Normandy, W Germany
4 arts fr W Germany
Ca & bb bombard fr 109
1 ftr fr W Germany
2 bmbs fr W Germ
2 tacs fr W Germ12 inf 4 art 8 tanks 1 ftr 2 tacs 2 bmbs ca bb vs. 4 aa 14 inf 2 art 3 ftrs
Aa guns
Rolls: 5@1; Total Hits: 25@1: (1, 4, 1, 4, 2)
Attack SZ 92 (dd ca bb cv 2 ftrs) with
4 subs fr 91 & 103
Cv fr 91
2 ftrs fr 91
2 ftrs 2 tacs fr Normandy1 cv 4 subs 4 ftrs 2 tacs vs. 1 dd 1 ca 1 bb 1 cv 2 ftrs
Attack
Rolls: 4@2 4@3 2@4; Total Hits: 34@2: (6, 3, 5, 5)4@3: (3, 3, 6, 1)2@4: (6, 5)
DefendRolls: 2@2 1@3 3@4; Total Hits: 62@2: (2, 2)1@3: (2)3@4: (3, 4, 3)
-
Amphib assault London (4 aa, 14 inf, 2 art, 3 ftrs) with
12 inf fr Gib, Norway, W Germany
8 tanks fr Gib, Normandy, W Germany
4 arts fr W Germany
Ca & bb bombard fr 109
1 ftr fr W Germany
2 bmbs fr W Germ
2 tacs fr W Germ12 inf 4 art 8 tanks 1 tacs 2 bmbs ca bb vs. 4 aa 14 inf 2 art 3 ftrs
Attacker
Rolls: 8@1 8@2 8@3 3@4; Total Hits: 88@1: (6, 2, 2, 4, 2, 3, 4, 3)8@2: (5, 6, 3, 1, 5, 1, 3, 1)8@3: (3, 6, 4, 5, 5, 4, 2, 1)3@4: (6, 1, 1)
DefenderRolls: 16@2 3@4; Total Hits: 816@2: (4, 1, 5, 5, 1, 6, 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 5, 3, 1, 1, 3)3@4: (6, 2, 6)
SZ 92
The dice could not have been any kinder to you there. And no, I don’t consider a Lepanto attack where you had close to a 50% chance to be equivalent to a battle where I had 98% odds going in.
Please choose your 3 hits.
-
my bombardment shots
bombard
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 21@3: (1)1@4: (1)
-
4 inf 4 art 8 tanks 1 tacs 2 bmbs ca bb vs. 8 inf 2 art 3 ftrs
Attacker
Rolls: 8@2 8@3 3@4; Total Hits: 98@2: (2, 2, 5, 4, 3, 4, 6, 5)8@3: (4, 2, 3, 3, 6, 4, 1, 1)3@4: (1, 5, 2)
DefenderRolls: 10@2 3@4; Total Hits: 510@2: (4, 6, 2, 6, 5, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4)3@4: (5, 4, 5)
-
4 inf 4 art 8 tanks 1 tacs 2 bmbs ca bb vs. 8 inf 2 art 3 ftrs
Attacker
Rolls: 8@2 8@3 3@4; Total Hits: 128@2: (1, 6, 6, 3, 1, 6, 4, 4)8@3: (1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1)3@4: (4, 1, 6)
DefenderRolls: 10@2 3@4; Total Hits: 410@2: (2, 4, 4, 1, 2, 2, 5, 6, 3, 4)3@4: (6, 6, 5)
-
4 art 8 tanks 1 tacs 2 bmbs ca bb vs. 1 ftr
Attacker
Rolls: 4@2 8@3 3@4; Total Hits: 54@2: (5, 2, 3, 1)8@3: (6, 4, 6, 3, 6, 6, 4, 4)3@4: (5, 1, 2)
DefenderRolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (2)
-
odds of you hitting 6 out of 6 in defense, 1 in 61.
-
odds of my rolling seven consecutive hits 1 in 15, more likely because all but 1 shot was rolling at 4.
-
The dice could not have been any kinder to you there. And no, I don’t consider a Lepanto attack where you had close to a 50% chance to be equivalent to a battle where I had 98% odds going in.
I’m checking the odds again and yes it’s 50%, I wonder why the calculator gave me 80%, cause it did. Anyway you have hit 100% for 2 consecutive rounds. What’s the chance of it? Check also China1 about your hit ratio.
Now, what if I want to scramble in London? Cause my airbase is operative.
-
sz92 losses:
I got 3 hits
1hit to BB
1hit to french DD
1hit to cruiser -
1ca 1bb vs 3fig is a 72% chance to hold London, so I will scramble.
-
ah yes, the airbase was not sufficiently damaged I guess. missed that.
Well you don’t have to allow me to adjust my attack to fly air cover over the invasion fleet, if you win that battle it will be game over, albeit a victory to you preventing sea lion, not post sea lion, or you can allow me to assign air cover, and we can reroll the entire attack.
-
ah yes, the airbase was not sufficiently damaged I guess. missed that.
Well you don’t have to allow me to adjust my attack to fly air cover over the invasion fleet, if you win that battle it will be game over, albeit a victory to you preventing sea lion, not post sea lion, or you can allow me to assign air cover, and we can reroll the entire attack.
Roll the scramble, if you get lucky we will continue the game, otherwise we will start another one, 'cause I want to change something in my strategy!
-
attack
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (6)1@4: (1)
defendRolls: 3@4; Total Hits: 23@4: (6, 2, 4)