@Jacob16 ah sorry didn’t know, playing a game now against someone who did that against me and thought it must be ok, they seem to be very experienced at the game.
I’ll put an extra infantry in kweichow and give 1 ipc to russia pls.
Updated
Stats on 3rd sheet
Axis are 16-5
If you want to win, let your opponent have the bid at less than 12.
Results tabulated for 2011 tournament (1941)
After excluding a few games I felt were mis-matches or involved a very inexperienced player (Gargantua said it was the first time he’d played AA50), I have:
Axis - 12
Allies - 6
Yoshi has been winning the semi-finals game since having a decent G1 and J1 and I suffered a disastrous R2. So it will probably be 13-6 unless he screws up (he won’t - he’s very thorough).
I only play 1941 because everybody else does. Still hate how it sets up Japan to take over half the world in only a few rounds of play.
Updated
Axis 16-7 (Latest Allied win on failed G1 dice and rep of Allied player)
Um - that is, the game was resigned before Russia took a turn
Updated
Axis win again
Column added for combo of 2011-2012 points, and column added with my subjective tier rankings
If you disagree with a 1-2-3 tier rating I made, please PM me and I will re-consider. Again, these rankings are just for fun, and serve to provide everyone with up-to-date W/L records and PCT for the league year.
I think the accuracy of the points and rankings will improve as more results come in!
2012 League record for Axis is 18-7, and it’s 12-6 in the tournament. This is tracked on the 3rd tab.
I am please to announce another improvement to my spreadsheet.
Recognizing that player who play more will tend to amass more points (or negative points), I have calculated the average points per game played. I’m thinking this might actually be the best stat that I have developed so far, for measuring player skill over the league games of 2011 and 2012. Review them, and see what you think.
I am adjusting the tier level of 2 players, and will be recalculating points accordingly. Spreadsheet to follow.
Spreadsheet
Forgot to re-order after re-ranking…
For comparitive purposes the top 10 from 2011 finished with these ppg numbers:
1.385 (13 games) Â
1.1 (10 games)
0.8 (10)
0.909 (11)
0.423 (26)
0.462 (13)
1.167 (6)
0.5 (10)
0.273 (11)
-0.091 (22)
For comparitive purposes the top 10 from 2011 finished with these ppg numbers:
1.385 (13 games) �Â
1.1 (10 games)
0.8 (10)
0.909 (11)
0.423 (26)
0.462 (13)
1.167 (6)
0.5 (10)
0.273 (11)
-0.091 (22)
No, those are no longer my top 10 for 2011
I actually went back and re-scored points
I’ll re-sort
Actually, I’m thinking a better order for the rankings is points per game
For 2011, that would be (minimum 5 games):
Gamer 1.385
Tyzoq 1.167
Dutchman 1.1
LL .909
Zhukov .8
Dragon .5
JWW .462
Bold .423
Billy .273
SouL 0
Rankings re-sorted by 2012 PPG
2011/2012 combination of PPG also included
Now that is a cool chart 8-)
Nice to see you say that, because if I hadn’t just re-sorted by PPG you would be the top dog now!
Updated
Updated
Updated