Oof. Very good dice for the Soviets this turn:
Net Allies dice swing: +4.31 swing
Net Axis dice swing: -4.31 swing
This means the Soviets ended up with 4.31 more units than they would’ve had otherwise.
London 2
att
Rolls: 2@2 3@3 3@4; Total Hits: 52@2: (5, 2)3@3: (5, 1, 5)3@4: (3, 3, 1)
def
Rolls: 4@2 2@4; Total Hits: 24@2: (4, 5, 3, 4)2@4: (4, 2)
Lose 1 fht, 1 art
London 3
att
Rolls: 1@2 3@3 2@4; Total Hits: 41@2: (2)3@3: (6, 1, 2)2@4: (6, 1)
def
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (2)
NCM
Fin to Nor
5 inf
Paris to Wge
5 tanks
Paris to Wfr
1 art
Ger to Pol
9 inf, 1 art, 3 AA
Bul to Rom
2 inf
Wge to Ger
3 AA
London to sz110
1 fht, 1 tac
London to sz112
1 fht, 1 tac
Place
sz112
5 TT, 1 CV, 1 DD
I will have to go back and see what your income was.
London = 29 tt’s + 1 saved = 30
On your turn you saved $1, plus you collected $32 after -$2 sub damage for a total of $33. With $1 more damage, you should have had $32.
Germany
Buys
1 CV, 1 DD, 5 TT save $1
I had $68 to spend, and only spent $59. I actually saved $11.
Collect
$54 + $11 + $32 = $97
I don’t get a bonus for having UK anymore, though I believe. If I do then I have $5 more.
Wrong map.
@Cromwell:
Wow, aren’t you dicey, Jim…heck no, I don’t scramble. Russia’s going to be a bear, literally.
Just testing the waters with this Alpha 3, that’s all. I want to see what possibilities there are.
Russia 2
Purchase: 1 INF, 5 ARM, 1 ART
Combat
Epl
3 INF Bessarabia
1 MECH, 1 ARM Bry
1 FTR Novgorod
Poland
6 INF Baltic
1 MECH, 1 ARM Belarus
2 ARM, 1 TAC, 2 FTR Novgorod
Pre-combat AA Fire above Poland:
Rolls: 3@1; Total Hits: 03@1: (6, 3, 6)
Combat Round One
Poland
A
Rolls: 7@1 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 67@1: (3, 5, 1, 1, 1, 2, 5)5@3: (5, 5, 1, 2, 4)1@4: (4)
D
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 510@2: (2, 2, 3, 6, 4, 1, 5, 3, 1, 2)
Epl
A
Rolls: 4@1 2@3; Total Hits: 24@1: (6, 2, 4, 5)2@3: (2, 2)
D
Rolls: 5@2; Total Hits: 05@2: (6, 5, 5, 4, 5)
Combat Round Two
Poland
A
Rolls: 2@1 5@3 1@4; Total Hits: 42@1: (4, 6)5@3: (1, 1, 2, 1, 4)1@4: (5)
D
Rolls: 7@2; Total Hits: 37@2: (2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 2, 5)
Epl
A
Rolls: 4@1 2@3; Total Hits: 34@1: (5, 1, 1, 2)2@3: (4, 2)
D
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (4, 2, 6)
Combat Round Three
Poland
A
Rolls: 4@3 1@4; Total Hits: 14@3: (4, 6, 4, 6)1@4: (1)
D
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (6, 3, 2)
Combat Round Four
Poland
A
Rolls: 3@3 1@4; Total Hits: 23@3: (2, 6, 2)1@4: (5)
D
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 1)
Combat
Walk-in Finland with 1 INF from Karelia
NCM
1 FTR Epl to Novgorod
1 FTR, 1 TAC from Poland to Novgorod
7 INF, 1 ART, 2 AA Gun to Baltic States
1 INF, 1 ART Smo to Belarus
2 INF Rostov to S. Ukraine
5 INF, 2 AA Moscow to Bryansk
9 INF, AA from Bury to Yak
9 INF, AA from Sak to Bury
1 SUB from sz 112 to sz 125
BB to sz 114
Placement: 1 INF, 1 ART, 1 ARM in S. Eukr
3 ARM in Novgorod
1 ARM in Russia
IPC
41 tt’s + 8 NO = 49 IPC’s
Oh, your German IPC total should be minus 1 IPC for the convoy disruption in sz 97.
Also, you stated before that you bought 1 Carrier (16 IPC), 1 DD (8), 5 TT (35 IPC), which equals 59 IPC. You started with a total of 68 IPC, which is 9 IPC saved from your 59 IPC buy, not 11. From where did you get 11 IPC saved?
It seems you had 50 tt’s + 9 saved + 5 NO (Denmark, Norway) - 1 Convoy Disruption in sz 97 + 32 IPC from London = 95 IPC
You’re correct that Germany no longer has London NO.
I got my numbers crossed. I was thinking 69 - 58.
I’m checking into the convoy issue.
I may have to go for Stirling again.
@Cromwell:
Oh, your German IPC total should be minus 1 IPC for the convoy disruption in sz 97.
I checked the map. The convoy disruption is included. I should be down $2 from my miscounting my saved money.
How can you tell the map includes it?
I would prefer a breakdown of the collection at the end of our turn with tt’s, convoy disruptions, etc. Your 54 tt’s number was inaccurate in either the actual tt’s or, if you included other factors in this number, as the designation of ‘tt’. This is confusing.
The map has a table thatat the bottm that calculates all income and deducts convoy disruption for you and adds bonus money. It is the table that shows unit counts.
The $54 is accurate.
Yeah, I see how it works now. You’re right, 54 was accurate as a number that included your + 5 NO, -1 convoy disruption and 50 tt’s. Makes sense.