Oof. Very good dice for the Soviets this turn:
Net Allies dice swing: +4.31 swing
Net Axis dice swing: -4.31 swing
This means the Soviets ended up with 4.31 more units than they would’ve had otherwise.
I think I see, each surface warship can disrupt 1 from each land territory adjacent to the sea zone with a convoy symbol, which would be 1 from S. Italy and N. Italy.
Anzac 1
Purchase: 1 DD
Combat
1 TT loads 2 INF and unloads in Java
NCM
AA moves to Que
2 FTR from NZ to Que
Cruiser sz 63 to sz 54
DD sz 62 to sz 54
Placement: 1 DD in sz 62
IPC = 14 tt’s
France
NCM
1 INF Syria to Trj
DD sz 72 to sz 81
1 INF Fwa to Fca
I think I see, each surface warship can disrupt 1 from each land territory adjacent to the sea zone with a convoy symbol, which would be 1 from S. Italy and N. Italy.
I looked but did not see this new rule?
Germany
Buys
1 CV, 1 DD, 5 TT save $1
CM
Paris to Nor
1 art
sz106 to sz118
1 sb
sz112 to sz118
1 sb
sz112 to sz110
1 BB, 1 CA, 1 CV, 3 TT (load from Nor 1 inf, from Wge 2 inf, 3 art to London)
sz112 to London
1 fht, 1 tac
Wge to London
2 fht, 2 tac
Hun to Epl
3 inf, 1 art
Pol to Epl
2 inf
Bul to Greece
2 inf
Yugo to Greece
3 tanks
Sit to sz97
1 fht, 1 tac
Do you scramble in sz110?
Bul to Greece
1 inf
Wow, aren’t you dicey, Jim…heck no, I don’t scramble. Russia’s going to be a bear, literally.
Just testing the waters with this Alpha 3, that’s all. I want to see what possibilities there are.
Battle of Epl
5 inf, 1 art vs 3 inf, 1 art
att
Rolls: 4@1 2@2; Total Hits: 24@1: (1, 6, 4, 5)2@2: (5, 1)
def
Rolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 04@2: (3, 4, 4, 6)
Epl 2
att
Rolls: 4@1 2@2; Total Hits: 14@1: (4, 2, 6, 2)2@2: (4, 1)
def
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (4, 4)
Epl 3
att
Rolls: 4@1 2@2; Total Hits: 14@1: (4, 2, 2, 2)2@2: (2, 6)
def
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Battle of sz118
2 sb vs 1 BB
att
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (5, 1)
def
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (5)
sz118 2
att
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 6)
def ignore if sb hits
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (6)
sz118 3
att
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (6, 1)
def ignore if sb hits
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (6)
Battle of sz97
1 fht, 1 tac vs 1 CV, 2 fht
att
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (6)1@4: (3)
Losses?
I found Krieghund’s ruling on the question I had about Convoy Disruptions: http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=4280&p=38646&hilit=Convoy+Disruptions+sz+97#p38646.
The rules are open to interpretation, but the evident design intent from his ruling regarding the oob convoy disruption is that each surface warship disrupts 1 IPC. I would need 7 warships to disrupt all of the IPC’s available for disruption in N/S Italy.
This brings me back to why did you collect 19 IPC’s at the end of Italy’s turn instead of 20? You spent all 10 to begin the turn, had 16 tt’s, 5 for NO, and minus 1 for sz 97 disruption.
FTR.
@Cromwell:
This brings me back to why did you collect 19 IPC’s at the end of Italy’s turn instead of 20? You spent all 10 to begin the turn, had 16 tt’s, 5 for NO, and minus 1 for sz 97 disruption.
You had a French DD off the coast of Ken preventing me from collecting a full $20.