Flip (allies) vs MrMalachiCrunch(axis) 42
-
Round 3
Wru: 1 Inf(Ukr)+Ftr(Cau) Vs Inf
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (5)1@3: (2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
-
Combat Results:
WRu: TWLO 1 Inf
EEu: TWOL
Bel: TWOLNon-Combat Moves:
Ger: Ftr(Bel), 4 Inf(WEu)
WEu: 3 Ftr(EEu), Ftr(Wru), Bmr(Bel), 3 Tanks(Ger)
Blk: 7 Tanks(Cau), 4 Inf(SEu)
Cau: Inf(Ukr)
Ukr: Inf(Blk)Builds:
Repair Ger 7Ger: 3 Inf+Tank 14
SEu: 6 Inf 18Collect 39 IPC, none saved
-
you could only build 3 units in Ger
I’m I missing something?
just going with your maps & i will take the 7 damage off Ger IC
Not that it effects much,but what would you like to do? -
Right, two less Inf, one more tank and save 1
-
I would also slightly change my moves, I would add 2 less Inf from ger to Blk
-
UK7
Builds
with 32
4inf=12
2tank=10
ftr=10
save 0Combat
3bmr UK SBR on GerGot it!
bmr UK SBR on SEu
2inf Kar to WRu
2ftr sz5 to WRu vs infGer aagun vs 3bmr
Rolling 3d6:
(2, 4, 6) -
Ger SBR 3bmr
Rolling 3d6:
(1, 5, 6)SEu aagun vs bmr
Rolling 1d6:
(6)SEu SBR bmr(if miss)
Rolling 1d6:
(3) -
WRu attack(1)2inf 2ftr
Rolls: 2@1 2@3; Total Hits: 22@1: (3, 3)2@3: (3, 1)
defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
-
Results
Ger IC takes 12 damage 19 total
SEu IC takes 3 damage
WRu twlo infNon Combat
3bmr Ger to UK
bmr SEu to UK
2ftr WRu to Rus
ftr UK to sz5
3inf 3tank UK via 3tt sz5 land in Kar
inf Arc to RusBuild placement
4inf 2tank ftr UKCollect income
Earned 21 saved 0= 21 IPC’s -
I had meant to move the German Subs from Sz32 to 38 and Sz22 to Sz11
Japan 7
Builds with 57 IPC on Hand:
2 Inf, 7 Tanks, ICSaved: 1 IPC
Combat:
WAf: Inf(FEq) Vs Undefended
Cng: Tank(Saf) Vs Undefended
Sz38: BB(Sz32)
Aus: Inf(Mad) Via TT(Sz32>38)
Aus: Inf+Tank(FIC) Via TT(Sz36>38)+BB(Sz38) Vs 2 Inf
Kaz: Tank(Yak), 2 Inf(Nov), Inf+3 Tanks(Sin)
Kaz: 5 Tanks+3 Inf(Cau), 3 Tanks(Ind)Kaz: 6 Inf+12 Tanks Vs 2 Inf+Art
Rolls: 6@1 12@3; Total Hits: 66@1: (5, 6, 4, 2, 6, 3)12@3: (5, 1, 2, 2, 6, 2, 3, 6, 3, 4, 4, 4)
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 13@2: (1, 3, 4)
Aus: 2 Inf+Tank+BB Vs 2 Inf
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 12@1: (6, 6)1@3: (2)1@4: (5)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (2, 5)
-
Round 2
Aus: 1 Inf+Tank Vs 1 Inf
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 01@1: (6)1@3: (6)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
-
Round 3
Aus: 1 Inf+Tank Vs 1 Inf
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (2)1@3: (3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
-
Combat Results:
Waf: TWOL Undefended
Cng: TWOL Undefended
Kaz: TWLO 1 Inf
Aus: TWLO 2 InfNon-Combat Moves:
Trj: Tank(Egy)
Sz36: BB+CV+TT(Sz34)
Sz48: DD+CV+SS(Sz36)
FIC: 4 Tanks+4 INf(Jpn) Via 2 TT(Sz61>Sz36), 2 TT(Sz60>Sz36)
Sin: 4 Inf(Chi), 2 Tanks(Man)
Chi: 2 Inf(Man)
Nov: 2 Inf(Yak)
Yak: Inf+Tank(Bry)
Kaz: AA(Cau)
Ind: AA(FIC)Mobilisation:
FIC: IC 15
Ind: 3 Tanks 15
Jpn: 4 Tanks, 2 Inf 26Collect 59 IPC, 1 saved, 60 IPC On Hand
-
So Japan wants the IC in Cau eh!
I don’t think i will oblige with that one. -
Am I that obvious? Chuckles
-
I hope I can see a move like that coming
it’s already tough enough. -
US7
Builds
with 43
I know this has been a mistake in the past but i’m going to anyway
8inf=18
2tank=10
IC=15
save 0Combat
2bmr UK SBR on SEuinf tank UK via tt cc ftr sz5 land in EEu
inf Kar to EEu vs 2inf3inf Kar to Bel
2ftr sz5 to Bel vs 2infSEu aagun vs 2bmr
Rolling 2d6:
(2, 4) -
SEu SBR 2bmr
Rolling 2d6:
(1, 2) -
EEu attack(1)2inf tank ftr cc bombard
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (4, 2)3@3: (3, 5, 6)
defend 2inf
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 3)
-
EEu attack(2)2inf tank ftr
Rolls: 2@1 2@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (6, 3)2@3: (6, 3)
defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)