Gsh34 (axis) vs. Axisplaya (allies) Alpha +3

Mal twol

z45 cleared (naked TT)

Battle for Shan St.

attacker: 2 inf, 3 fig, 2 tac, 2 sbr
Rolls: 2@1 3@3 4@4; Total Hits: 42@1: (4, 3)3@3: (4, 5, 4)4@4: (1, 4, 1, 4)

defender: 3 inf
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 23@2: (2, 3, 1)

Shan St. cwlo 2 inf

Battle for Kwe

attacker: inf, 2 fig, 2 tac
Rolls: 1@1 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 41@1: (6)2@3: (1, 2)2@4: (3, 3)

defender: inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

Kwe cwlo 1 inf

Sorry for the delay.  My daughter woke up rather grumpily from a nap today and I just got around now to finishing the turn.

NCM

to Hop:
inf, art Cha

to Man:
4 inf, aa gun Jeh

to Anh:
2 inf Jeh

to Hun:
art Ksi
inf Ksi

to Kwa:
inf Ksi
art Hon
3 fig, 2 tac, 2 sbr Shn

to Ksu:
2 fig, 2 tac Kwe

to z37
CV, 2 SS  z35
2 tac Mal
DD z35
DD z43

to z42:
2 fig Mal
2 CV z35
fig z45
DD z35

to z44
BB, z35

to z36:
BB, CA, DD, 4 SS z6

Placement:
mIC and naval base in FIC
mIC in Hon

Collect Income:
51 territories + 1 saved = 52 ipc

gsh34_vs_axisplaya_2cJapan.AAM

Axisplaya,

On the US turn, the battle for the Carolines isn’t over.  My aa gun is a valid hit, so I have one infantry remaining.  You’ll have to roll another round in that battle.  It will take a bit of time to get used to the aa gun changes I think.

I guess I’m ok with using the valid NOs on battlemap.  I’m just afraid that I will use it as a “crutch” and it will end up getting me mixed up since some NOs were dropped and other added.  But, if that is how you want to do, I’m fine with that.

z107 for the UK Atlantic fleet???  What’s going on there?  I’m watching you…… :-)

Italy, round 2

Purchase: 17 ipc to spend

2 mech ( 8 )
tank (6)
inf (3)
total = 17

Combat:

to Alx: (walk in)
4 inf, 2 art Tob
mech, tank Libya
1 inf, tank Gre > TT z97 > z98 > Alx

to Trj: (1 inf)
2 inf Nita > TT z97 > z98 > Trj
sbr Sita (3 move remain)
BB, 2 CA z97 > z98 for shore bombardment

to Sud: (walk in)
3 inf, art Ken

Battle for Trj:

attacker: 2 inf, sbr, BB, 2 CA
Input ErrorThere was an error in your dice throw: “2” is not correct syntax.

defender: inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

hmmm, let’s try the attacker again….

attacker: 2 inf, 2 CA, BB, sbr
Rolls: 2@1 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 22@1: (1, 5)2@3: (5, 6)2@4: (5, 4)

Trj twlo 1 inf

NCM:

to Gre:
sbr Trj

to z98:
2 DD z97

to Fra:
2 art Sfr

to Yugo:
tank Sfr
aa gun Nita

Placement:
2mech, tank, inf in Nita

Collect income:
18 territory + 5 NO = 23 ipc

If you could just split your income collection into “territory + NOs + saved - convoy raiding”, that would be sufficient and awesome for me.  Otherwise, feel free to use the Alpha +2 NO markings to your hearts content.  By listing the breakdown of your money, it just makes my error checking easier.  After all, we are all human and who hasn’t counted up incorrectly at some point?  Thanks Axisplaya.

I await the French moves as I say good night.

gsh34_vs_axisplaya_2hItaly.AAM

Germany, round 3

Purchase: 53 ipc to spend

1 sbr (12)
4 inf (12)
4 art (15)
2 SS (12)
save 2
total = 53

Red Alert!  Red Alert!  DOW on Russia!

Combat:

to z114 (BB)
BB z112
4 tac, 3 fig, sbr Wgr

to z124 (SS)
DD, fig, tac z112

to Bes (walk in)
1 inf Rom

to Epl (walk in)
1 inf Hun

to Bal (walk in)
22 inf, 4 art Pol
4 tank, 3 mech Ger
3 tank Hun

to Kar (walk in)
1 inf Fin

to Vyb (walk in)
5 inf Fin