G40 Stirling (AXIS) VS. Soul (ALLIES)

Rus1:
purchase:
ftr 9 inf

combat:

ncm:
6 inf aa sah -> bury
6 inf amu -> sah
tac ftr rus -> yak
ss 127 -> 125
2 inf cau -> ros
inf arch, 2 inf kar, 3 inf vyb, 3 inf bal -> nov
mech arm rus, 2 inf epl -> bel
2 inf bes, 3 inf SUkr -> NUkr
2 inf ros -> SUkr
arm mec vol -> novo
inf art aa rus -> bry

mobilize:
3 inf Nov, 3 inf SUkr, 3 inf vol, ftr rus

collect:
37+0=37, has 37

Stirling_vs_Soul__G1_1bRus.AAM

I believe you can only purchase an IC on a territory you orginally control.  So if you’d like to revise the japanse turn, then you may.

I think it’s the same as AA50, and I’m working on a confirmation… but I do believe that territory, although under Japanese control at the start of the game, is considered originally Chinese.

would it change that much that I couldn’t continue with my turn?

One can build a MINOR Industrial Complex on any territory they control so long as it is worth at least 2 IPC.  It does not matter if the territory is green, red, grey, orange, tan or neutral as long as it is worth 2 IPC.

One can only build a MAJOR Industrial Complex on territories that are their own color. (Japan could build one on Manchuria, Germany in Romania, etc).  Territories must be worth at least 3 IPC to support a major complex.

Stirling is building a minor complex in KSU, if I am reading correctly.  KSU is worth 3 IPC and as this is Japan 1, it is certainly controlled by Japan.  Therefore, it can support a minor complex.

Should China liberate KSU (or anyone else for that matter) the complex is destroyed and removed from the board.  China is not permitted to own complexes and no allied nation can take temporary control of Chinese territories.

fantastic, thanks!  Onto the Allies.

US1:
Purchase:
2 cv bb

combat:

ncm:
ftr phi -> gua
dd sub 35 -> 54
2 ftr haw, dd ca cv bb 10 -> 26
trn 10 load inf art -> 26 unload haw
bmb cus -> haw
ftr wus, ftr eus -> 10
trn 101 load inf art ->11
ca 101 -> 11
aa eus -> cus
inf 3 mech arm cus -> wus

mobilize:
2 cv bb 10

collect:
52+0=52, has 52

China1:
Purchase:
4 inf

combat:
3 inf ftr sze -> yun

yun
aRolls: 3@1 1@3; Total Hits: 03@1: (3, 3, 2)1@3: (4)
dRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

yun2:
aRolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (2, 6)1@3: (5)
dRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

yun3
aRolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (2)1@3: (2)
dRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)

yun twlo 2 inf.

ncm:
inf she, 2 inf kwe -> sze
2 inf sui -> she

mobilize:
4 inf sze

collect:
9+6=15, has 15

UK1:
Purchase:
trn 7 inf

combat:
dd ca tac 58, ftr gib, ftr mal-> 97
trn 98 load art egy -> 96 load inf mal unload tob
ca 91 -> 96 support tob
2 inf art arm alx, mec egy -> tob

scramble orders for 97?

Stirling_vs_Soul__G1_1fUK.AAM

@Cmdr:

One can build a MINOR Industrial Complex on any territory they control so long as it is worth at least 2 IPC.  It does not matter if the territory is green, red, grey, orange, tan or neutral as long as it is worth 2 IPC.

One can only build a MAJOR Industrial Complex on territories that are their own color. (Japan could build one on Manchuria, Germany in Romania, etc).  Territories must be worth at least 3 IPC to support a major complex.

Stirling is building a minor complex in KSU, if I am reading correctly.  KSU is worth 3 IPC and as this is Japan 1, it is certainly controlled by Japan.  Therefore, it can support a minor complex.

Should China liberate KSU (or anyone else for that matter) the complex is destroyed and removed from the board.  China is not permitted to own complexes and no allied nation can take temporary control of Chinese territories.

Looks like I’m late - I’m here by SouL’s request.

This is an excellent answer, and I concur.  SouL was thinking of the rule against major IC’s in non-original territories.  Japan can never build a major on Ksu, but a minor on J1, as she said, is perfectly legal.

Have a fun game, guys.