I lose one cruiser one fighter one tac bomber
You are left with one dmged battleship
Attack
Rolls: 4@3 2@4; Total Hits: 44@3: (2, 3, 6, 4)2@4: (3, 1)
Defend
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (2)
Cleared with crazy losses. I lose 1 more fighter
Hko taken
I sorely wish I had left my planes on my Aircraft-Carriers now… (I can still counter-attack strongly mind you)
Also this may change a lot of your losses as well but doesn’t a kami hit at a 2 instead of a 1?
Unless that changed in alpha 2? Please see page 14 of the Pacific Rulebook.
This would change drastically what you have left in SZ 20 as 1 extra AC is also killed.
Actually it all could have been avoided if I didn’t foolishly forgot to kill the Sub which I thought I could ignore until after I did combat and realized I couldn’t Non-com there, LOL
yeah you’re right about the 2 thing for kami’s my bad.
hmm lets see, so there is one carrier left rather than three, so if its allright with you instead of losing that cruiser I will lose a fighter that will not change battle outcomes since they are both threes, as I would have done that had I known it would have just crashed into the sea instead of landing on the carrier
I should have just retreated and finished up that battleship with my anzac forces… o well
so left in that sea zone are 2 fighters 1 carrier, 2 damaged battleships a cruiser and a transport
US NCM
1 tac 1 fighters sz 23 >> us carrier sz 23
1 tac >> caroline islands
2 subs 2 destroyers 1 transport (w/ 1 mech inf 1 inf) sz 10 >> sz 26 unload land units on hawaii
1 mech inf wus to eus
China
Purchase 2 inf
Combat
Walkin
She, kwe 1 inf each
Ncm to yun
Deploy 2 inf yun
Collect 11
UK Pacific
Purchase (15/15 save)
1 airbase
1 infantry
Combat
kwa
1 tk fic
2 mech inf bur
1 fighter 1 tac bomber bur
1 fighter india
Attack
Input ErrorThere was an error in your dice throw: “1” is not correct syntax.
Defend
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (4)
hun
1 mech inf to hun walkin
IRQ
1 inf load tt eth >> unload Iraq
1 bombard from battleship
1 tk Egypt >> iraq
1 tac bomber india >> Iraq
Rolls: 1@1 1@3 2@4; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)1@3: (6)2@4: (5, 6)
Defend
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 03@2: (3, 3, 5)
Siam
1 tk walk in from Malaya
sorry don’t know why that attack didn’t work
kwa r1 still
Rolls: 1@1 3@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (5)3@3: (6, 3, 5)1@4: (5)
irq yay great stuff there grumble
Rolls: 1@1 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (5)2@3: (4, 3)1@4: (6)
Defend
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 23@2: (2, 4, 1)
yay great round, so kwa lose 1 mech inf, you lose plane
irq retreat one tac bomber to npr
1 destroyer sz 80 >> sz 81
3 mech inf 1 tk india >> epr
2 fighters land hko
1 art Egypt to sud
1 inf sud to eth
1 inf ken to eth
1 sub sz 124 >> sz 119
1 destroyer sz 122 to sz 106
1 inf 1 art qbc to eus
1 inf india to bur
1 aa gun bur to yun
1 inf malaya to shm
deploy 1 inf india 1 airbase hko
collect 32
Anzac
Purchase 4 subs
Combat
Sz 22
1 sub 2 fighters (sz 33 and dgu)
Attack
If sub hits ignore defense
Rolls: 1@2 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)1@3: (6)1@4: (5)
Defend
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)
Ksi
1 tt unloads 1 tk 1 inf from car
1 fighter bur
1 cruiser
Attack
Rolls: 1@1 3@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (6)3@3: (1, 4, 4)
Defend
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
both territories cwol (sub took down cruiser with sneak)
(there was no need for kamis in the sz 22 because it was one sub)
NCM
Planes land on anzac carrier sz 33
Plane lands in hko
2 inf Egypt to sud
1 carrier 1 sub sz 62 >> sz 33
1 destroyer sz 33 to sz 20
all subs placed in sz 62
collect 24
Did UK Pacific only have $15 to start off? Airbase cost $15
bleh thought they were 12, yeah they had 15 so no infantry on india
Italy Turn 4 ($33)
Purchase:
5 Inf ($15), 3 Arm ($18)
Combats:
Iraq (2 Inf) - I move 1 INf, 1 Art from Syria and activate Iraq
SZ 91 (2 trns) vs 1 SS from SZ 92
Egypt (empty) vs 4 Inf (3 Alex, 1 Gre via 1 trn in SZ 97 which is also carrying the german Inf) , 1 Art (Alx)
TJ (empty) vs 1 Inf & 1 Art (greece) via 1 trn in SZ 99
Mor (1 Inf) vs 1 Inf (alg), 1 Mech & 1 Arm (Tun)
Gib (1 Mech) vs 3 Inf (2 SIT, 1 Gre), 1 Arm (NIT) via 2 trns in SZ 97
Off to the dice:
SZ 91 - both trns destroyed
Egypt , TJ, Iraq - All taken WOL
Gib Bombard (1 CA)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (1)
Gib attack (3 Inf, 1 Arm)
Rolls: 3@1 1@3; Total Hits: 13@1: (4, 2, 5)1@3: (2)
Gib Defense (1 Mech)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
Mor Attack (1 Inf, 1 Mech, 1 Arm)
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (6, 6)1@3: (2)
Mor Defense (1 Inf)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
I moved my CA for bombard there assuming I can use the naval base for my destroyers afterwards, if this isn’t allowed I wouldn’t have used it then.
Results,
SZ 91 - both trns destroyed
Egypt , TJ, Iraq, Mor, Gib - All taken WOL
NCM:
1 Arm from Greece to RMA
1 AA from Rug to RMA
1 Inf, 1 Art from WFR to SFR
2 DD from SZ 92 to SZ 98
Placement:
2 Inf on SFR
3 Inf on SIT
3 Arm on NIT
Italy collects: $23 + $15 (NO) = $38
Should be interesting in a few turns.
You can’t kill tts with subs. You need to control gibraltar at begin of turn
Destroyers can’t make it, you only can move plus one from a base you owned at begining of turn. Probably best if you are using a unit in combat to ask first. I don’t want to be a jerk… How about a compromise you move one dd to sz 98 and leave the cruiser in 92. I can’t mobe through the canal because you own both sides.
Ok france moves dd from 38 to 43.
Subs can go through the Gibraltor strait regardless of ownership of Gibraltor. Pg 8&9 of the Europe rulebook.
Go figure… Never read that last part. That would have been helpful to know
No worries; I’ll leave both destroyers in SZ 92 then with my Cruiser still there (it was my bad for not asking in advance).
Just for clarification though so I can learn do you know what page of the rule book it says for NCM I need to own the naval base at the start of the turn (it makes sense); I read the part of at the beginning of the units movement if it starts at a friendly naval base it can move 3 (which is what the destroyers are doing beginning their movement and it’s a friendly naval base now).
Also Italy has $40 (I just caught the 2 extra for the Iraq NO).
Go figure… Never read that last part. That would have been helpful to know
I was wondering why you left them unprotected, mind you I had other options (planes from UK or WGE or a naval unit)
