japan1.tsvg
house rules: No Russian naval restrictions while not at war. tech labs that produce a dice/turn. Not removed. Battleship in 101. Bonuses for the Atlantic free of enemy ships. Free facility for each power. 10 ipcs for facilities. Free tech at the beginning of the game for each side. Random. Bonus 5 for USA.
EM (Axis) vs. Botider (Allies) G40A2 +NO -Tech Gm3
-
Nov rd1
A: 14inf, 2mech, 1art, 6tnk
Rolls: 15@1 2@2 6@3; Total Hits: 315@1: (2, 6, 4, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 5, 5)2@2: (3, 1)6@3: (4, 3, 5, 5, 6, 5)
D: 1inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
-
geez…what lousy attack dice i’ve been getting.
-
Results:
Sukr SBR -4
Spa taken, 2inf lost.
Nov taken, 1inf lost.NCM: Per Map
Place Units:
Upgrade Rom IC
1ab-Greece
3inf-Rom
5inf-Ger
2inf-WfrCollect 54+15=69
-
Okay,… new scenario for me. Since you attacked Turkey, that means all strict neutrals are now pro-allied neutrals, correct?
If so, Sweden would be included, which will negate that NO for Germany… if I understand this correctly (which is a long-shot at best)… :wink:
Mulling things over… a whole lot more choices than I am used to. And a whole lot more holes to step in. :-P
-
proceeding on the assumption that strict neutrals are now allied-leaning neutrals…
russia 5
purchase
3 inf, rtl, 3 arm… spend $31, save $1combat
sz125 (dd)
ss sz127north ukraine (inf)
2 inf, rtl, 2 mech south ukraineeast poland (inf)
2 inf
ftr, tbmb smolenskbaltic states (inf)
2 inf belarus
ftr, tbmb smolensk -
on land…
north ukraine
2 inf/mech @ 2, mech/rtl @ 2
Rolls: 3@2 2@2; Total Hits: 43@2: (2, 2, 1)2@2: (2, 4)
vs
inf @ 2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
-
a lot of wasted ammo… we’re good at shooting dead guys. it’s easier… they don’t move as much.
east poland
2 inf @ 1, ftr @ 3, tbmb @ 4
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 02@1: (5, 5)1@3: (5)1@4: (5)
vs
inf @ 2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
-
yeah, when they’re alive, they’re harder to hit
east poland
inf @ 1, ftr @ 3, tbmb @ 4
Rolls: 1@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (1)1@3: (6)1@4: (5)
vs
inf @ 2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
-
got 'em! using that italian handbook on assault tactics… doesn’t work as well. as troy would say, 'choot ‘em, lizabuth’. :lol:
baltic states
2 inf @ 1, ftr @ 3, tbmb @ 4
Rolls: 2@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@1: (6, 1)1@3: (4)1@4: (3)
vs
inf @ 2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
-
east poland / baltics taken w/ loss of inf in each
and now for the nail-biter… let’s see what those russian submariners have in 'em…sz125
ss @ 2
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 410@2: (4, 5, 3, 1, 3, 2, 3, 4, 2, 2)
vs
dd @ 2
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 410@2: (3, 6, 1, 2, 3, 1, 6, 6, 1, 6)
-
not much… phooey. dead ss and no NO. rats…
noncombat
2 ftr, 2 tbmb baltic states > smolensk
inf smolensk > belarus
inf smolensk > archangel
3 rtl belarus > smolensk
7 arm belarus > bryansk
6 inf, 3 rtl russia > smolensk
inf brynask > south ukraine
inf yakut > ulaanbaatar (1 inf conscripted)
inf yakut > dzavhan (1 inf conscripted)
16 inf, aa yakut > yenisey
aa belarus > smolensk
aa south ukraine > north ukrainedeployment
3 inf, rtl, 3 arm > russiacollect
$29note: i reduced germany’s income by $5 since sweden is no pro-allied neutral. if that’ s not correct, add the money back.
-
(hesitation) … bump!
8-) … I’m gonna be out of pocket for a couple of weeks, so take your time. But I didn’t know if you’d forgotten about this one. I kinda want to keep going… you’re doing some things I haven’t seen and I want to see how it plays out.
-
i’m back… it’s your turn.