M7574 & EM (axis) vs Anchovy & moulinex (allies) G40 alpha +2
-
Ok, what do you want me to do? It was an innocent error, and based on a call I’ve seen others on this board make (albeit with subs). Nonetheless the result seems clear. I’m not trying to pull a fast one. If you insist however, I’ll re-roll from scratch round by round.
Yes, you may have seen many rolls like that, but they are always 1 against 1. These are too the death battles and are common.
I’m not trying to be difficult, but I can’t find anyway to agree to your roll, it leaves too much open to assumptions that can’t be justified, like how you come up with rd3 &4 when you only rolled for rd2. I think the only reasonable option is to reroll. I don’t think it will change much.
-
I see what EM is saying. But since he has two attackers we need to hit twice, EM.
I suppose if we had this battle ruled on by the higher powers, EM you would get a re-roll. But this is a friendly game and I’d rather accept the result. However, if EM insists, it should get re-rolled. Thats how its done in AAMC or DAAK.
By the letter of the law, its your call EM. Thats my official stance.
-
Rolling that way is an unfair dice advantage, it totally skews the results because it leaves the roller to decide how to interpret the dice. To the death rolls are allowed and common, because it’s first one to hit. There is no interpretation.
-
I don’t think i’m being unreasonable that I should object to a completely bogus roll that costs Japan one of it’s NO’s.
-
What I did in no way skews the odds, nor should there be any interpretation issue, however its your call so I’ll reroll.
Att:
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (6, 2)
Def:
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
-
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (6)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
-
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 11@1: (1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
-
Conveniently enough, the same result
-
It always turns out that way, but now i feel better. Thank you.
-
Please in the future no more rolls like that.
-
No problem
-
OK. I’m glad that’s over. 8-)
M7574, sorry I missed your updated map. Yes, I will take Smolensk by a tank blitz from Rus and back. Russia collects 22. I have changed my non-coms slightly, accordingly. So, EM, please use this map.
Although I don’t think it will make a difference, the bb in z71 should still be damaged. I’ve changed it on the map.
-
J8
Purchase $66
1mIC
1CV, 1BB, 1DD
1mech, 1tnkCM:
SZ43 (1SS, 1TP)\Borneo (1inf)
1DD sz44>sz43
2bmb Japan>sz43
1art Malaya, 1inf Philippines>Borneo via 1tp sz37>sz36>sz35>sz43
1fgt Malaya>BorneoJava (4inf, 1art, 1mech)
2fgt Malaya
4fgt, 4tac sz37Dice…
SZ43 rd1
A: 1DD, 2bmb
Rolls: 1@2 2@4; Total Hits: 21@2: (3)2@4: (3, 1)
D: 1SS
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)
-
Borneo rd1
A: 1inf, 1art, 1fgt
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 5)1@3: (2)
D: 1inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
-
Java rd1
A: 6fgt, 4tac
Rolls: 6@3 4@4; Total Hits: 66@3: (3, 6, 3, 2, 5, 4)4@4: (2, 6, 3, 1)
D: 4inf, 1art, 1mech
Rolls: 6@2; Total Hits: 26@2: (6, 1, 5, 6, 1, 4)
-
Results:
SZ43 cleared, no losses.
Borneo taken, no losses.
Java cleared, 2fgt lost.NCM: Per Map
Place Units:
1mIC-FIC
1CV, 1BB, 1DD-SZ37
1mech, 1tnk-KsuCollect $60
-
US8
IPC=82
Purchases: 4 inf, 2 ss, 2 trn, 1 ab, 1 nb, 1 minor ic, save 2Combat
fin
1 inf nwyiraq
2 inf trjz43
1 ss z45
6 ftr z42fin twol (mt).
iraq
A: 2 inf
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 12@1: (2, 1)
D: 1 inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
-
Iraq twol.
z43
A: 1 ss, 6 ftr
Rolls: 1@2 6@3; Total Hits: 31@2: (3)6@3: (6, 5, 3, 3, 1, 4)
D: 1 dd, 1 trn
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
-
z43 cwol.
NCM
see map.Place
2 inf eus
1 trn z101
1 nb, 1 minor ic nwy
1 ab java
1 trn, 2 ss z10
2 inf wusCollects
63 + 20 NO = 83 + 2 saved = 85China sits.
-
London has 42 IPCs = 14 inf
India has 12 = 4 infRepair the bb in sz 71
Combat:
1 inf & 1 tank Tang –> Persia
1 mec egy --> SyriaNoncoms and placement on the board
London collects 35 + 10 NO = 45
India collects 6